January 2025

By: Jeffrey Kondas, Technology Fellow

Abstract

Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has become a cornerstone in the field of machine learning due to its efficiency in dealing with large datasets. This white paper explores SGD, its limitations, and the evolution of its variants, providing an in-depth look at how these algorithms enhance the training of neural networks. We will cover theoretical foundations, practical implementation, and discuss the implications of these methods on the efficiency and convergence of machine learning models.

Introduction

Machine learning models, especially neural networks, require optimization algorithms to adjust parameters iteratively to minimize error. SGD stands out for its ability to handle large datasets by processing them in smaller batches or even single examples, leading to faster learning with less computational overhead.

Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)

Fundamental Concept

SGD updates parameters based on the gradient of the loss function for one or a small subset of training examples:

w_{new} = w_{old} - \eta \cdot \nabla J(w; \mathbf{x}^{(i)}, y^{(i)})

Where:

\eta is the learning rate
\nabla J(w; \mathbf{x}^{(i)}, y^{(i)}) is the gradient of the loss function J for a single example or mini-batch.

Code Sample (Python):

pythonimport numpy as np def sgd_update(w, learning_rate, gradient): return w - learning_rate * gradient

Challenges

Learning Rate Sensitivity: An inappropriate learning rate can lead to slow convergence or divergence.
Noisy Updates: The stochastic nature can cause high variance in parameter updates.
Local Minima and Saddle Points: SGD might struggle with complex loss landscapes.

Source:

Ruder, S. (2016). “An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms.” Link

Variants of SGD

Mini-Batch SGD

Mini-Batch SGD uses a small subset of data to compute gradients, offering a compromise between efficiency and stability:

w_{new} = w_{old} - \eta \cdot \frac{1}{m} \sum_{i=1}^{m} \nabla J(w; \mathbf{x}^{(i)}, y^{(i)})

Where m is the size of the mini-batch.

Code Sample (Python):

pythondef mini_batch_sgd_update(w, learning_rate, gradients, batch_size): return w - learning_rate * np.mean(gradients, axis=0)

Momentum SGD

Momentum adds a fraction of the previous update to the current one, helping to maintain momentum in the loss landscape:

v_t = \gamma v_{t-1} + \eta \nabla J(w)

w_{new} = w_{old} - v_t

Where \gamma is the momentum coefficient.

Code Sample (Python):

pythondef momentum_sgd_update(w, learning_rate, gradient, velocity, momentum): velocity = momentum * velocity - learning_rate * gradient return w + velocity, velocity

Source:

Sutskever, I., et al. (2013). “On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning.” ICML. Link

Nesterov Accelerated Gradient (NAG)

NAG looks ahead by calculating the gradient after a partial momentum update:

v_t = \gamma v_{t-1} - \eta \nabla J(w - \gamma v_{t-1})

w_{new} = w_{old} + v_t

Code Sample (Python):

pythondef nag_sgd_update(w, learning_rate, gradient, velocity, momentum): look_ahead_w = w + momentum * velocity velocity = momentum * velocity - learning_rate * gradient(look_ahead_w) return w + velocity, velocity

Source:

Nesterov, Y. (1983). “A method for solving the convex programming problem with convergence rate O(1/k^2).” Soviet Mathematics Doklady.

AdaGrad

AdaGrad adapts learning rates for each parameter, reducing them for parameters with large gradients:

G_t = G_{t-1} + (\nabla J(w))^2

w_{new} = w_{old} - \frac{\eta}{\sqrt{G_t + \epsilon}} \cdot \nabla J(w)

Where \epsilon is a small constant to avoid division by zero.

Code Sample (Python):

pythondef adagrad_update(w, learning_rate, gradient, g, epsilon=1e-8): g += gradient ** 2 return w - (learning_rate / (np.sqrt(g) + epsilon)) * gradient, g

Source:

Duchi, J., et al. (2011). “Adaptive Subgradient Methods for Online Learning and Stochastic Optimization.” Journal of Machine Learning Research.

RMSprop

RMSprop uses a moving average of squared gradients to normalize the gradient:

E[g^2]_t = \rho E[g^2]_{t-1} + (1 - \rho)(\nabla J(w))^2

w_{new} = w_{old} - \frac{\eta}{\sqrt{E[g^2]_t + \epsilon}} \cdot \nabla J(w)

Where \rho is the decay rate.

Code Sample (Python):

pythondef rmsprop_update(w, learning_rate, gradient, eg2, rho=0.9, epsilon=1e-8): eg2 = rho * eg2 + (1 - rho) * (gradient ** 2) return w - (learning_rate / np.sqrt(eg2 + epsilon)) * gradient, eg2

Source:

Tieleman, T., & Hinton, G. (2012). “Lecture 6.5—rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude.” COURSERA: Neural Networks for Machine Learning.

Adam (Adaptive Moment Estimation)

Adam combines momentum and RMSprop concepts, adjusting learning rates for each parameter:

m_t = \beta_1 m_{t-1} + (1 - \beta_1) \nabla J(w)

v_t = \beta_2 v_{t-1} + (1 - \beta_2) (\nabla J(w))^2

Bias correction:

\hat{m}_t = \frac{m_t}{1 - \beta_1^t}

\hat{v}_t = \frac{v_t}{1 - \beta_2^t}

Update:

w_{new} = w_{old} - \eta \frac{\hat{m}_t}{\sqrt{\hat{v}_t} + \epsilon}

Code Sample (Python):

pythondef adam_update(w, learning_rate, gradient, m, v, t, beta1=0.9, beta2=0.999, epsilon=1e-8): m = beta1 * m + (1 - beta1) * gradient v = beta2 * v + (1 - beta2) * (gradient ** 2) m_hat = m / (1 - beta1 ** t) v_hat = v / (1 - beta2 ** t) return w - learning_rate * m_hat / (np.sqrt(v_hat) + epsilon), m, v

Source:

Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014). “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.

Conclusion

SGD and its variants are pivotal in modern machine learning, each offering unique approaches to address different aspects of optimization. From handling large datasets to improving convergence speed, these algorithms provide tools for developers to train models more effectively. For further exploration, one should consider practical implementations in libraries like or , which implement these algorithms, offering a hands-on approach to understanding their application.

This white paper has aimed to provide a comprehensive overview while ensuring that proprietary or sensitive information is safeguarded through the use of emojis for redaction.

By: Jeffrey Kondas, Technology Fellow

1. Introduction

AI-driven conversational agents have seen significant advancements with models like Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT, Deepseek, Claude, Kimi.ai, and others. This whitepaper aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of these AI models across various dimensions including features, performance, limitations, and technical specifications.

Models Included in Analysis:

Grok (xAI)
Gemini (Google)
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Deepseek (High-Flyer AI)
Claude (Anthropic)
Kimi.ai (Kimi Technologies)
Grok-2 (xAI’s latest model)
Mistral (Mistral AI)

2. Top Features

Grok:

Real-time Web Access: Integrates directly with X posts for current information. Source:
Maximally Helpful: Designed to provide truthful and helpful responses without woke biases. Source:
Image Generation: Can generate images based on text descriptions. Source:

Gemini:

Multimodal Capabilities: Handles text, images, and video for a richer interaction. Source:
Integration with Google Ecosystem: Seamless with Google Workspace for business use. Source:
Ethical Focus: Emphasis on safety and reduced harmful outputs. Source:

ChatGPT:

High Versatility: Useful for various tasks from coding to content creation. Source:
Customizable Extensions: Supports plugins for extended functionality. Source:
Voice Interaction: Advanced voice command and response capabilities. Source:

Deepseek:

Efficiency: Performs well with fewer resources, making it cost-effective. Source:
Logical Reasoning: Emphasizes detailed logical reasoning before responses. Source:
Coding Assistance: Particularly strong in math and code-related queries. Source:

Claude:

Enterprise Ready: Focused on reliability and ethical use for business applications. Source:
Long Context Window: Can manage large conversational contexts. Source:
Reduced Bias: Emphasizes fairness in responses. Source:

Kimi.ai:

Privacy-Centric: Designed with strong privacy protections. Source:
Educational Focus: Tailored for educational applications with interactive learning tools. Source:

Grok-2:

Enhanced Reasoning: Improved from Grok with better logical and creative responses. Source:
More Efficient: Claims to be even more resource-efficient than Deepseek. Source:

Mistral:

Open-Weight Models: Offers transparency and control to developers. Source:
Multilingual Support: Strong performance across multiple languages. Source:
Efficiency: Lightweight, suitable for edge computing scenarios. Source:

3. Advantages and Disadvantages

Grok:

Advantages: Real-time data, less biased responses, image generation. Source:
Disadvantages: Limited integration outside X platform, newer in market with less user data.

Gemini:

Advantages: Broad Google service integration, ethical considerations. Source:
Disadvantages: Potentially high cost due to extensive features, complex for basic uses.

ChatGPT:

Advantages: Broad use-case support, large user base, and developer community. Source:
Disadvantages: Can sometimes provide outdated information, high operational cost.

Deepseek:

Advantages: Cost and resource efficiency, strong in logical tasks. Source:
Disadvantages: Limited brand recognition, less extensive natural language capabilities.

Claude:

Advantages: Business-oriented, ethical AI focus, long context support. Source:
Disadvantages: Higher subscription costs for advanced features.

Kimi.ai:

Advantages: Privacy focus, educational tools. Source:
Disadvantages: Niche market focus might limit broad appeal.

Grok-2:

Advantages: Improved from Grok, better performance metrics. Source:
Disadvantages: Still evolving, limited user feedback for optimization.

Mistral:

Advantages: Developer-friendly, efficient for various applications. Source:
Disadvantages: Less known compared to giants, might require more setup for complex tasks.

4. Prompt Character Limit and Token Explanation

Token Explanation: Tokens are pieces of words; for example, “playing” might be split into “play” and “##ing” in tokenization.
- Grok: Typically uses a token limit around 4096 for input, but specifics vary. Source:
- Gemini, ChatGPT: Up to 8192 tokens for input in some versions, with output limits varying. Source:
- Deepseek, Claude: Often around 4096 tokens, with some models offering more. Source:
- Kimi.ai, Mistral: More variable, often tailored for specific use cases, generally around 2048-4096 tokens. Source:
- Grok-2: Improved token handling, specifics not publicly detailed yet.

5. Result Token Limitations

Most models have output token limits around 2048 to 4096, with some premium versions extending this for a fee. Source:

6. Energy Use

Efficiency: Deepseek and Mistral are noted for their lower energy consumption due to efficient model architectures. However, exact metrics are often proprietary:
- Grok, Grok-2: Moderate due to real-time web access and image generation capabilities. Source:
- Gemini, ChatGPT: Higher due to complex infrastructures and large user bases. Source:
- Claude: Focused on enterprise use, which might imply optimized energy use. Source:

7. Database Schema

General: Most models use complex schemas involving vector databases for semantic search, SQL for structured data, and NoSQL for flexible data storage. Specifics are often not disclosed but typically include:
- Vector Index: For similarity searches.
- Metadata Tables: For managing prompt and response history.
- User Profiles: To personalize responses based on user interaction history.

8. Programming Languages Written In

Python: Ubiquitous in AI development due to its libraries like TensorFlow, PyTorch. Source:
C++: For performance-critical parts of the system. Source:
JavaScript/TypeScript: For web interfaces and some backend services. Source:
Rust: Increasingly used for system-level performance in AI applications. Source:
Go: Favored for scalability and concurrent operations in some models like Grok. Source:

9. Conclusion

Each AI model has its niche where it excels, whether it’s efficiency, ethical considerations, real-time data interaction, or educational content. Choosing between them depends on specific use cases, budget considerations, and the technical environment. As AI technology evolves, these models will likely continue to converge in capabilities, but their unique features and philosophies will keep them distinct in the market.

References:

Information for this analysis was gathered from various sources, including but not limited to:
- Public documentation and developer blogs from respective companies.
- Benchmarking reports and AI comparison articles on the web.

Disclaimer: The specifics of some features, especially regarding token limits, energy use, and database schemas, are often not fully disclosed by developers. This whitepaper uses publicly available data and expert estimation where details are sparse.

Hawks forward Jalen Johnson to undergo surgery for torn labrum in left shoulder, out for season

Johan Oviedo and Pittsburgh Pirates go to first salary arbitration hearing of the year

Jorge Mateo and Orioles agree to 1-year, $3.55 million deal to avoid arbitration

Lakers center Anthony Davis out at least one week with abdominal strain

How Will Tesla Stock React to Earnings? What Options Markets Say.

Hawks forward Jalen Johnson to reportedly undergo season-ending shoulder surgery

Dillon Brooks, Trae Young each received technicals on play where Brooks grabbed back of Young’s neck

Giants trade Taylor Rogers to Reds for right-handed pitching prospect

Stochastic Gradient Descent and Its Variants in Machine Learning

Comparative Analysis of Advanced AI Models