MLB Opening Day 2025: Giancarlo Stanton now swinging a bat in recovery from elbow injuries, Yankees manager Aaron Boone says

Giancarlo Stanton has begun swinging a bat, New York Yankees manager Aaron Boone said prior to the Yankees’ Opening Day win over the Brewers on Thursday. That’s an encouraging sign toward the slugger’s return as he begins the 2025 season on the injured list due to tendinitis in both of his elbows.

Since receiving two rounds of platelet-rich plasma injections to accelerate healing in the elbows, Stanton has steadily improved each day, Boone said. However, the Yankees still haven’t placed a timetable on his return. 

“He’s doing pretty well,” Boone told reporters on Thursday. “I think we’ve all been encouraged by the last couple of weeks. Still no timetable on anything. But he’s been able to swing the bat and feel like there’s been some steady improvement day after day.”

Stanton, 35, hadn’t been able to swing — and had difficulties even gripping a bat — during spring training and acknowledged that he struggled with the condition in his elbows going back to last season. 

The 16-year veteran did not opt for surgery during the offseason. Nor did the Yankees address the issue because Stanton didn’t admit he was having difficulty until shortly before spring camp opened. By that point, surgery would’ve sidelined Stanton for three months and was viewed as a last resort.

Last season, Stanton batted .233 with a .773 OPS, 27 home runs, 20 doubles and 72 RBI in 114 games. He was a force during the postseason, hitting seven home runs with a 1.048 OPS. (Stanton was named ALCS MVP after hitting four homers against the Cleveland Guardians.)

With Stanton out of the lineup, Ben Rice got the Opening Day start at DH, batting eighth versus the Milwaukee Brewers and right-hander Freddy Peralta. Rice is expected to start most of the time against right-handed pitching. Aaron Judge started Thursday in right field, with Cody Bellinger in center and Jasson Domínguez in left. Judge and Bellinger each had an RBI in the win.

MLB Opening Day 2025: Guardians still beat Royals after Tanner Bibee scratched from start due to food poisoning

The Cleveland Guardians hadn’t played a single regular-season game yet, but already faced adversity hours before their opener when Tanner Bibee was scratched shortly before his start due to food poisoning.

The team went with Ben Lively instead, and he delivered. Lively allowed three runs on four hits across five innings, and the Guardians went on to beat the Kansas City Royals 7-4 in the 10th. Lively was expected to serve as the team’s No. 4 starter coming out of spring training, but was pushed into action earlier than expected with Bibee sidelined.

Steven Kwan knocked in the go-ahead run in the 10th on a double that scored Brayan Rocchio. Designated hitter Kyle Manzardo hit a key two-run homer to give the Guardians a 4-3 lead in the sixth inning. Manzardo also came through with a two-run double in the 10th to finish with three hits and four RBIs.

The Royals forced extra innings on Michael Massey’s sacrifice fly in the ninth.

Bibee, 26, was named the team’s Opening Day starter after he put up a 3.47 ERA over 173 2/3 innings in 2024. It was going to be Bibee’s first career Opening Day start.

Bibee emerged as a future star during the 2023 MLB season, posting a 2.98 ERA in 25 starts after being called up. On other teams, that performance might have put Bibee in the conversation to start Opening Day in 2024, but the Guardians opted for veteran Shane Bieber instead. That wasn’t a surprising move, as Bieber had started every Opening Day for the Guardians since 2020.

With Bieber sidelined to start the 2025 MLB season, that honor was supposed to shift to Bibee. Instead, Lively received the call on short notice. It’s unclear when Bibee will make his season debut. The Guardians have an off day Friday before continuing their opening series against the Kansas City Royals on Saturday. That might give Bibee enough time to rest and recover. The Guardians have updated their starting pitchers to TBD for Saturday’s and Sunday’s games, leaving the door open for Bibee to start one of those contests.

Cleveland is looking to repeat as American League Central champs after winning 92 games last season. Losing Bibee on Opening Day definitely stings, but it shouldn’t affect the team’s season-long goal of another postseason run. 

MLB players, teams and themes that will tell the story of the 2025 fantasy baseball season

Opening Day is finally here. Let’s examine some players, themes and teams that will define the fantasy baseball season.

The Dodgers are the most automatic playoff team there is. They’ve won 11 NL West titles in 12 years, and haven’t missed the playoffs since 2012. Last year they only allowed two pitchers to get past 90 innings, with an eye towards a healthy October. How much will Shohei Ohtani pitch? Will he even pitch at all? Is this the year Dave Roberts pulls back on heavy workloads for his daily lineup guys? How soon will Mookie Betts be feeling right again?

[Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Baseball league for the 2025 MLB season]

Los Angeles is the most fun and watchable team in baseball. It’s a traveling circus. But it’s also going to be a source of constant fantasy worry.

Skenes was a video game for his 2024 debut — 1.96 ERA, 0.947 WHIP, 170 strikeouts in 133 innings. Those are backyard Wiffle Ball stats. Will the Pirates let Skenes cut loose for six months if the team is not in the playoff hunt?

Another Pittsburgh player I’m curious about is Oneil Cruz. His batted-ball page is a delight. He was 15-for-15 on steals in the second half. He steps into his age-26 season when career years often pop. He’s worth the daily price of admission.

How I weep for the memory of deGrom on the Mets, the most dominant pitcher we’ve seen in at least 20 years. Black ink all over his baseball reference page. How can we ever unsee what he did in 15 starts back in 2021 — 1.08 ERA, 0.554 WHIP. All those stats read like misprints.

Of course, he’s also had two Tommy John surgeries. He’s entering an age-37 season. DeGrom hopes he can dial back his velocity a bit and still be effective — while taking fewer chances with his health. I throw my coin in the fountain and make a wish. I want to believe.

I’m a believer in Austin Wells, but even I can admit he’s an unorthodox leadoff man. Cody Bellinger is another player I want to draft, though his recent career form jumps around like some crazy stock chart. Anthony Volpe is an angelic fielder, but he’s yet to provide offense metrics over the league average. If the Yankees are going to return to the playoffs, Judge needs a few running mates.

We’ve seen this shift click in recent years — look at what Michael King has become in San Diego. Holmes has multiple plus pitches and landed in the Opening Day slot for the Mets. I always love an RP-eligible pitcher to make the rotation, especially in head-to-head leagues where they add extra value.

If Holmes stays in the rotation for a full year, the wins could flow easily. New York’s lineup looks like a blast, 1 through 9.

Brent Rooker is coming off a monster year and Lawrence Butler was the OF5 in the second half of 2024. Those boons came despite the horrible batting backdrop in Oakland. It’s not easy to project how the Sacramento park will play, but it can’t be any worse than the previous home stadium. I could see the plucky Athletics being this year’s version of the Tigers.

Houston’s park was a dream for left-handed power. Wrigley Field is a horrible place for a lefty slugger to hit. Tucker is a true five-category player so maybe he can overcome any environment, but this wasn’t my favorite landing spot for him. He’s also a year removed from free agency, adding more intrigue to his age-28 season.

I think the Red Sox are the plausible A.L. East favorite as the season opens. The Garrett Crochet trade looks like a steal and they smartly added Alex Bregman to a creative contract. But Boston needs Devers to be healthy and happy — his shoulders are an issue, and he’s been shifted to DH, a move he passionately opposed. A healthy and engaged Devers has MVP upside. But this could also be an emotional drag on the season.

Back in 2023, the Braves were almost too good to be true. Perfect lineup. Cy Young Award winner. But it quickly fell apart in 2024, when injuries ravaged the lineup and Spencer Strider didn’t make it out of April. Ronald Acuña Jr. says he wants to run less this year, and I’ve faded him at the draft table. But most of the lineup felt reasonably priced to me this spring. Spencer Schwellenbach looks ready to take off.

Some other players and themes I can’t wait to track this year: Hunter Brown, all the Seattle starters, Corbin Carroll, Jackson Merrill, Bryce Harper, Wyatt Langford, Byron Buxton (could we please get 130 games?), Hunter Greene, George Kirby, the defense of Pete Crow-Armstrong, the running of Xavier Edwards, the comeback of Robbie Ray, Terry Francona helming the Reds, the top three prospects in the Boston organization.

Bold Fantasy Baseball predictions for the 2025 MLB season

MLB Opening Day has arrived, and our fantasy baseball analysts are ready to fire off their hottest final takes for the season. Check out what they think will happen on both the pitching and hitting side for 2025.

To be honest, I’m not sure if this prediction is bold or tepid or just mildly unlikely.

We know beyond any doubt that Scott possesses the wheels and base-stealing acumen to get this done. He has 99th-percentile sprint speed, and he swiped a ridiculous 94 bags in the minors back in 2023. Scott won the Opening Day center-field job in St. Louis, thanks to a scorching-hot spring in which he delivered seven extra-base hits and five steals while hitting .349. But he has been a mostly unremarkable hitter in the minors who happens to have one elite trait: blistering speed.

If Scott can simply hold onto an every-day role in the majors, he’s fully capable of producing an Esteury Ruiz-style season in which he almost single-handedly wins a category for you. — Andy Behrens

Obviously, we want talent at all positions, but fantasy baseball is also a game of volume. Wells is going to enjoy that volume, parked at the top of the New York batting order to start the year. It’s the catbird seat, working in front of Aaron Judge and Cody Bellinger. Wells has an excellent walk rate and a tenable strikeout rate, and last year’s slugging percentage was unlucky against his batted-ball profile. There’s no reason to draft a catcher early in one-fill leagues, with a player such as Wells generally available between pick 150 and 200.

[Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Baseball league for the 2025 MLB season]

And just for fun, I’ll offer a bonus prediction. Xavier Edwards will steal at least 50 bases. The Marlins need something to promote, Edwards knows how to get on base, and his light is going to be green for six months. Rabbit, run. — Scott Pianowski

Chourio, who posted a 150 wRC+ after the All-Star break as a 20-year-old last season, is on the fast track to superstardom. If we prorated Chourio’s final 250 ABs last season over a 600-AB pace, we get: .310-93-29-105-29. And he was too young to order a drink!

Shohei Ohtani enters the obvious MVP favorite, but he’s due for regression, is coming off major surgery and will lose at-bats while having to focus on pitching again this year. Voters might also experience some fatigue after Ohtani has won three of the past four years. Chourio recorded a 222 wRC+ with a 13.2 K% during spring, so he’s ready for a monster 2025. Chourio takes home MVP as a long shot (35/1). — Dalton Del Don

Ichiro Suzuki won a batting title when he hit .350 in his rookie year, but he entered the majors as a 27-year-old with several seasons of professional experience. Leaving Ichiro out of the equation, Wilson is about to join Tony Oliva (1964) as the only rookies in more than a century to lead their league in batting average. This prediction goes way out on a limb, as Wilson hit .250 in 92 at-bats last year and is going undrafted in virtually every Yahoo league. But if there’s one thing the soon-to-be 23-year-old knows how to do, it’s collect base knocks. Wilson hit .401 in 79 games in the minors, and he struck out just 26 times in 337 plate appearances.

The shortstop can be a .300 hitter right away (some popular projection systems already have Wilson hitting over .280), and last year, just three men in the AL reached the .300 plateau. Wilson, who still doesn’t have an MLB homer or steal, will be a mediocre but useful fantasy asset in the mold of Luis Arráez, who has an ADP of 140.8. — Fred Zinkie

Cleveland’s No. 1 starter is already basically a secret ace. He has a deep arsenal of pitches that range in effectiveness from quite good to pure evil, and he’s coming off a year in which he struck out 9.7 batters per nine innings while pitching through minor health issues. At 26, fresh off a multi-year extension, he’s a clear candidate to make a leap. Bibee will also benefit from a lights-out bullpen that can be trusted with even the most fragile lead. It’s not difficult to imagine him reaching 16 wins and 200 Ks while producing excellent ratios. — Behrens

I’ve seen a bunch of IP projections for Ohtani, and they all seem wildly optimistic to me. The Dodgers are not going to force Ohtani back to the mound, especially in the early season. His bat is too valuable. He hasn’t pitched in more than a year, of course, after elbow surgery. The Dodgers know they’re in the playoffs already, which means all of their pitchers (and some of their every-day players) will be handled especially carefully. Drafting Ohtani as a hitter is always a blast, but he’s essentially not on my pitching board. His pitching return is not an immediate priority for the Dodgers. — Pianowski

Schwellenbach was a second-round pick in the MLB draft, but he has pitched like a top prospect since returning from Tommy John surgery in 2022. He experienced a big jump in innings last year but was especially impressive over the second half, when he posted a 2.73 ERA and a 0.97 WHIP with a 23.3 K-BB% that would’ve ranked fifth on the season. Schwellenbach offers six different pitches and owned a Chase% and BB% in the top five percentiles last season.

Schwellenbach will also benefit from pitching for the Braves for several reasons; Atlanta starters recorded 29% more wins than Detroit’s SPs last season despite both staffs finishing with similar ERAs (3.58 vs. 3.69). The Braves offense comically underperformed and/or got injured last season, so run support should be even greater this year.

Schwellenbach recorded a 2.27 FIP and a 0.95 WHIP with a 28:3 K:BB ratio over 21 spring innings, so he looks like a top-12 fantasy pitcher and a strong long shot (30/1) bet to win the Cy Young this season. — Del Don

Currently being selected on average as the 30th starter in Yahoo drafts, Gallen has greater ace potential than many men who are being tabbed ahead of him. Despite missing a few starts last year, the right-hander does not have a long injury history, and he showed workhorse capabilities when he threw 184 innings in 2022 and 210 frames in 2023. Across that two-year stretch, Gallen logged ace-like ratios (3.04 ERA, 1.02 WHIP) and maintained a healthy 9.4 K/9 rate.

Gallen also has strong win potential, as he accumulated 31 victories across the past two years and is backed by an offense that led the majors in scoring last season. Pitchers tend to rise and fall in a hurry, as was evidenced when a rookie (Paul Skenes) and an oft-injured veteran (Chris Sale) finished as top-five arms last year. — Zinkie

Bulls’ Coby White is ascending into a star. But can Chicago risk keeping him?

The Chicago Bulls are winning basketball games these days, which might seem like the point of a basketball team. Yet, the organization has long been in dire need of a full teardown, which makes this recent development all that more complicated.

They’re winning, in large part, due to the play of Coby White, who has channeled his inner Kevin Durant lately.

White is averaging 29.3 points over his past 13 games, and has morphed into one of the best plug-and-play guards in the NBA, due to his proficiency of playing both with the ball in his hands, and without. He’s been assisted on 75% of his 3-pointers and 34% of his 2-pointers, which are numbers that highly agree with the eye-test in regards to his ability to both self-create, and play off of the attention given to others.

After a bit of a sluggish start this season, the 25-year-old is sporting a true-shooting percentage of 61.1% after the turn of the calendar year and over the course of 33 games. He’s also a solid secondary ball-handler who doesn’t turn the ball over much, and his defense has improved over the past three years.

Big picture, White has fans wondering: “Is he good enough to build a roster around?”

While there isn’t a clear answer yet to that question, White is currently the best candidate on the Bulls to warrant such an approach. 

The hot name of late, Josh Giddey, comes with a large platter of concerns in regards to spacing and off-ball implementations. Giddey would need highly specific players around him for such an experiment to even get off the ground. White is, by far, the easier player to install in a role as a featured player given that his skill set allows for much broader roster construction ideologies.

Bulls rookie Matas Buzelis can be used as a bit of a litmus test, as he can develop in a variety of ways. The 6-foot-10 lanky forward is a solid shooter, but not an overwhelming one. That shot may improve, or it might end up being average.

Furthermore, Buzelis has solid on-ball chops, and it’s reasonable to expect him to become more of a ball-handler as he matures. With his athleticism, there’s a world wherein Buzelis becomes more focused on the interior, to the point where the 3-point shot is utilized more as a secondary or tertiary weapon.

Coby White can enter unrestricted free agency in 2026.
Isaac Wasserman/Clarkson Creative via Getty Images

Next to a roster with White as the main cog, that wouldn’t be much of a problem. White’s game is so bendable and would allow Buzelis — and others — the space to develop as a creator.

Basically, White may not be a franchise player, but the archetype of player that he is could certainly mimic one.

The fact that he’s reached this level, though, is why the Bulls find themselves in a bind.

White, who is in his sixth NBA season, is sitting on arguably the most team-friendly contract in the NBA at $12 million this year, and $12.8 million next season.

When the league agreed to a new collective bargaining agreement with the NBPA, it included a 20 percentage point bump in extension allowance, meaning a player can now sign for 140% of his latest salaried year, instead of the previous 120%.

(For players earning below league average, the league allows for players to sign for 140% of the average salary as well, to give teams and players a fighting chance if they’re on almost unrealistically small deals.)

But it’d be entirely unreasonable for the Bulls to expect White to accept a new extension this summer, based off a 140% extension number. Even if the league average compensation level becomes $15 million this summer, and Chicago offers an extension off that number, that would limit White to a starting salary of $21 million. That’s probably around $10 million to $15 million less annually than what it’s going to take to get a deal done, meaning the Bulls will inevitably have to make a decision:

Either they trade White this summer, or they let him enter unrestricted free agency in 2026.

There are potential downsides and opportunities to both scenarios.

Trading White: If the Bulls walk this path, odds are good they won’t get a full return for their star guard, seeing as any receiving team would immediately adopt the same contractual limitations that Chicago faces, while getting only one “playoff year” out of him before he’s a free agent.

(Chicago could have moved White before the trade deadline in February, and thus offered teams his availability for two playoff years, which, in strong likelihood, would have given the Bulls a bigger return than what they can get now.)

If White is traded to, say, Orlando over the summer, the Magic wouldn’t be able to extend him to a higher number, and they, too, would risk losing him the following summer.

The sole exception to this is if the Bulls trade White to a team that will have active cap space on their hands, and thus have the ability to initiate a process known as renegotiate-and-extend.

In this scenario, the team with cap space that trades for White can negotiate a new deal that replaces the final year of his contract — the one where he’s earning $12.8 million — with a much higher salary, and then a new extension is built off that number.

Say the Brooklyn Nets acquire White, and they wish to spend $20 million of their cap space to add on to his contract. White’s deal for 2025-26 now becomes $32.8 million, and that would be the new number to base the 140% extension limit around, allowing Brooklyn to hand White an extension that starts at $45.9 million in 2026-27, after White has finished his seventh season, which triggers his new max eligibility from 25% of the cap to 30%.

Obviously, the above is only an example. We still don’t know if White will be a max-level player by that time. In some ways, the Bulls should hope that he is, so they can offer him more money in 2026 and hope to retain him off the basis of finances. This would be the path of not trading White, and letting him experience unrestricted free agency next year.

Letting White enter unrestricted free agency: As Chicago would be the incumbent team, it can offer White higher annual raises (8% off the base salary), and a fifth year on his contract. If White plays at a max or even near-max level, it’d actually be easier for the Bulls to make this offer than if he’s stuck between the $30 million to $40 million area. This is where outside teams can make offers that will be financially competitive with what the Bulls can swing, while potentially offering superior situations in regards to winning, organizational structure, and perhaps even market size.

Of course, the Bulls could simply say “screw it” and offer White the max regardless of whether he’s worth it or not, in which case they’d run into a hurdle of future financial limitations, particularly if they also hand Giddey a major contract this coming summer.

Essentially, the Bulls are in a tough spot with White, and his ascension only makes it more difficult. 

The fact that White can play off the ball, while also taking over possessions, makes him enormously attractive for teams with ball-dominant superstars. If the Lakers see LeBron James retire in 2026, White would make perfect sense as a backcourt partner to Luka Dončić, and could occupy a big chunk of the salary slot left by James.

There will be plenty of teams around the league that can offer White both money, and a competitive situation. The Bulls, pending their success next season, might be able to offer only one of those elements.

As such, whether they like to or not, the Bulls will have to make a decision this summer on how to proceed. Because make no mistake, the sharks are circling, and rightfully so.

Would you pay $100K for a signed baseball card with a piece of an Evan Longoria bat knob — or $700 for the entire bat?

Evan Longoria created a stir in the collectibles world when he posted a picture of his new 2025 Topps Tier One Baseball card. (Photo by Daniel Shirey/MLB Photos via Getty Images)
Daniel Shirey via Getty Images

Evan Longoria ignited the card-collecting social media world this week when he posted a baseball card he recently signed for Topps.

Sure, Longoria has plenty of signed cards — well over 1,000 different ones.

But this one stood out.

It included a bat knob piece from one of his bats and made it truly special because the bat knob featured Charizard, the popular Pokémon character.

With the Pokémon world in a current frenzy over trading cards combined with baseball card hype building, the mash-up created a perfect moment for collectors.

The card, which will be in 2025 Topps Tier One Baseball, immediately caught the eye of Alan Narz, owner of Big League Cards in Casselberry, Florida.

He didn’t just like the card. Narz NEEDED it.

Narz immediately announced a $100,000 bounty for it.

“I think it belongs at Big League because our primary goal is to be the best sports and Pokémon store in the country,” Narz said. “All of a sudden the best sports and Pokémon card is right there. It’s just perfect. We have to have that card; whatever it takes.”

Narz, who has been in the card industry for decades, feels this is the first MLB-licensed card featuring a Pokémon character. Topps has produced Pokémon cards before, but that was simply under the Pokémon IP.

Bat Knob cards are popular with card collectors. They feature the bottom of a bat that has been cut off and embedded into a card. Topps has included dozens of players, from legends like Babe Ruth and Jackie Robinson to modern-day stars.

There’s something about bat knob cards that are so appealing.

“When Topps puts that magic dust on a card, everything changes,” Narz said.

It certainly feels that way because after the card was posted, it was noted by an X user that an Evan Longoria full-sized game-used bat with the same Charizard image on the knob was available on eBay for under $1,000.

That caught the attention of Doug Caskey. He also had his eye on the Longoria card when it was posted.

Caskey, one of the co-founders of Mojobreak, has felt a connection to Longoria since the breaking business began in 2010.

The Longoria Superfractor out of 2006 Bowman Chrome was one of the most chased cards in modern-day collecting. Longoria was a top prospect and the Superfractor is one of the most desired cards.

The card has never surfaced publicly, which is a story in its own right, and at the time became a legend amongst collectors and breakers. Mojobreak spent a lot of time opening that product looking for the Superfractor.

Caskey is also from the Bay Area and a San Francisco Giants fan where Longoria spent five seasons.

“We’ve always been engrained with Longoria,” Caskey said. “We were always like ‘The Longoria hasn’t been pulled!’ We talked about it a lot. It still hasn’t been pulled!”

But instead of trying to match the bounty Big League Cards put on the bat knob card, Caskey bought the full-sized bat on eBay for $700.

“I didn’t think it was going to get so many comments and likes (on X),” said Caskey of his post about buying the bat. “For [Mojobreak], we have a large Pokémon group, and we are from the Bay Area. That is a really cool piece.”

Would Caskey still like to find the card when 2025 Topps Tier One Baseball comes out later this year?

Of course! A collector can’t help it with that Topps dust sprinkled on it.

“It’s the hunt for the Tier One bat relic,” Caskey said. “There’s nothing like it. That is not as fun as hunting this card down.”

35 Movies Where the Sex Scenes Are Essential

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Modern movie audiences seem to be as prudish as ever when it comes to sex on the big screen, as online discourse frequently runs to the tiresome topic of whether or not sex scenes are strictly “necessary” to the plot of any particular film. I’m not convinced movies ought to be so laser-focused on plot anyway—reducing a Shakespeare play to just the dialogue that advances “plot” would have us in and out in 20 minutes—but suggesting sex is somehow uniquely unnecessary strikes me as an overcorrection.

Yet it seems explicit sex scenes in Beau is Afraid, All of Us Strangers, Infinity Pool, Passages, Saltburn, Baby Girl, and Queer have been traumatizing unwary theatergoers as of late, even as the Oscars haven’t shied away—this year’s Best Picture winner, Anora, includes a fair bit of steaminess, while last year’s Poor Things, was racy enough to draw controversy and criticism, particularly in the U.K., where only a censored version was initially released.

Leaving aside whether I personally find this discussion worthwhile, there certainly are films for which we can draw a straight line between sex scene and plot, or which use sex to reveal their characters (no pun intended). Consider these 31 movies, and see if you come away feeling any better about the existence of characters who fuck.


Boogie Nights (1997)

Though the sex isn’t wildly explicit, it would be altogether silly for a film set in and around the world of 1970s cinematic porn to skip the sex scenes entirely. One moment in particular comes at the outset of Dirk Diggler/Eddie Adams’ career, as he’s filming his first explicit scene with Julianne Moore’s Amber Waves/Maggie. The moment captures Eddie’s nervousness as well as his sexual charisma, while also making clear that this is a job for everyone involved. The crew looks on while Maggie gently guides her co-star through his first on-screen orgasm. It’s not an overwhelmingly passionate scene, but it is a surprisingly tender one. You can rent Boogie Nights from Prime Video.


Poor Things (2023)

Rather hard to choose just one sex scene here, given that the entire movie has to do with the sexual exploration of Emma Stone’s childlike Bella Baxter. Running the gamut from deeply icky to aspirational, the movie doesn’t lack for sexual energy, but the key moment, perhaps, is a relatively brief moment between Bella and sex worker Toinette (Suzy Bemba). It’s a scene that opens Bella up to the possibility of sex as comfortable and companionable, and not merely an animal urge. Socialist Toinette teaches Bella about a world outside of fancy houses and privilege, and the beginning of their relationship marks the moment at which Bella begin her real journey. You can stream Poor Things on Prime Video.


Brokeback Mountain (2005)

OK, granted, the impromptu sex scene at the center of Brokeback Mountain was clearly choreographed and performed by people with only the vaguest notions of what sex between two men can look like—as if there exists not a single queer in Hollywood who might have been consulted. The moment pays off sexual tension that has been building between Ennis (Heath Ledger) and Jack (Jake Gyllenhaal) from the first frame. It’s significant that the filmmakers choose to make clear that sex is a component of the attraction here, beyond the cutesy stuff. You can stream Brokeback Mountain on Peacock or rent it from Prime Video.


Oldboy (2003)

Park Chan-wook’s action classic is not for the faint of heart on any level, and that includes the sex scene between Dae-su (Choi Min-sik) and Mi-do (Kang Hye-jung). It’s not that the moment is itself wildly explicit, but the movie’s last-act reveal of Mi-do’s true identity is genuinely shocking in context, and brings the 15-year timeline of revenge and counter-revenge full circle. You can rent Oldboy from Prime Video.


Beau is Afraid (2023)

A nearly three-hour journey into the headspace of the deeply anxious title character (Joaquin Phoenix), Beau is Afraid was one of the last year’s most polarizing films—and was probably my favorite of 2023. Many of Beau’s troubles stem from the vaguely psychosexual manipulations of his mother, Mona (Patti Lupone), who made sure to describe to the young Beau the mid-coitus death of his father in excruciating detail. Sexual phobias aren’t the entirety of Beau’s problems, but they’re a key component of his inability to connect with other people. When he does finally have sex, at the movie’s climax (ahem), it only makes things so, so much worse for a guy who cannot catch a break. You can stream Beau is Afraid on Max and Paramount+ or rent it from Prime Video.


Saltburn (2023)

Another of the year’s most hotly debated films, Saltburn transports The Talented Mr. Ripley to Northamptonshire, England, with mixed results. Scholarship student Oliver (Barry Keoghan) has pursued Felix (Jacob Elordi) from Oxford all the way to the guy’s ancestral home, only for Oliver to find (*major spoilers coming*) that his plans of getting in with the posh crowd are going to need to involve murder. His dreams of sex with Felix having gone down the drain (somewhat literally), Oliver instead fucks Felix’s fresh grave. The scene is there for shock value, sure, but also makes clear that Oliver’s machinations to that point were never purely strategic, and that his lust/obsession with Felix was very real. You can stream Saltburn on Prime Video.


The Terminator (1984)

The love scene between Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) and Kyle Reese (Michael Biehn) is neither particularly hot nor explicit, but it is essential to the film, and the franchise as a whole. Without the sex-on-the-run between the two, John Connor will never be born to save humanity, and won’t be around to send Kyle Reese back in time to train Sarah. Very timey-wimey. The moment makes the great Terminator 2 possible, but also a series of largely forgettable sequels—so it’s not all good news for humanity. You can stream The Terminator on MGM+ and The Roku Channel or rent it from Prime Video.


Atonement (2007)

Set over the course of, nearly, a lifetime, Atonement kicks off with Briony (Saoirse Ronan) witnessing mildly rough sex between her sister Cecilia (Keira Knightley) and the housekeeper’s son Robbie (James McAvoy). Jealous and confused, the young heiress mistakes what she sees for rape, which clouds her judgement when she accuses Robbie after an actual sexual assault occurs shortly thereafter. Briony’s allegation sets in motion a cascade of events that darkens the lives of those around her, allowing the real assailant to go free. As the movie’s title suggests, Briony spends much of her life trying to make amends for her mistake. You can rent Atonement from Prime Video.


The Shape of Water (2017)

Guillermo del Toro’s fantasy romance involves love between a deaf custodian and the mysterious fish man with whom she forms a bond. From that premise, del Toro crafts an instant classic that earned him Best Picture and Best Director Oscars. When Eliza (Sally Hawkins) makes love to her amphibian companion (Doug Jones), it’s in a bathroom that’s entirely submerged, with an explosive release of water taking the place of a more traditional climax. Eliza later explains the mechanics of the event to a friend—all of this serving to make clear that this love story is both emotional and sensual, and not merely the chaste romance of a Disney movie about mer people. You can rent The Shape of Water from Prime Video.


Gerald’s Game (2017)

Not much of a spoiler here, since the inciting incident occurs within the first 10 minutes of this Stephen King adaptation: Jessie and Gerald Burlingame (Carla Gugino and Bruce Greenwood) arrive at an isolated lake house, where Gerald tries to engage in a rape fantasy that Jessie is deeply uncomfortable with. The interaction makes obvious the rift that has developed in their marriage, but before Gerald can take things further, the two have a fight during which he has a heart attack and dies…leaving her handcuffed to the bed and totally isolated. Stephen King-style shenanigans ensue. The opening is more troubling than explicit, but without it, the movie doesn’t happen. You can stream Gerald’s Game on Netflix.


In the Realm of the Senses (1976)

Nagisa Ōshima’s gorgeous art film was wildly controversial upon release, largely for the very realistic sex scenes—realistic, because they were largely unsimulated. It’s based on the true story of Sada Abe (Eiko Matsuda), a one-time sex worker who begins an obsessive affair with a patron (Tatsuya Fuji) of the hotel where she works. Sada Abe’s refusal to conform to societal expectations of her gender and class don’t make her a hero, exactly, but it does bestow upon her a strange sort of freedom. The impact comes in part from the film’s refusal to undersell Sada Abe’s sexual power—sex is a critical part of her story, in the movie and in real life, and Ōshima isn’t afraid to show rather than merely tell. You can stream In the Realm of the Senses on The Criterion Channel.


Babygirl (2024)

Nicole Kidman stars in this modern erotic thriller as successful CEO Romy Mathis, who begins a dangerous affair with her much younger intern (Harris Dickinson). But the key sex scene isn’t between the two of them, but between Romy and her husband in the film’s opening moments. After faking an orgasm, Romy waits for Jacob (Antonio Banderas) to leave and then grabs her laptop so that she can masturbate. If we’re willing to suspend disbelief and accept Antonio Banderas as a schlubby, sexually disappointing husband (OK, whatever), the scene does a lot of work efficiently setting us up for the boundary pushing exploration to come. You can rent Babygirl from Prime Video.


Baby Face (1933)

Though we’re firmly pre-code here, there’s nothing explicit in this film—but still, little is left to the imagination. Barbara Stanwyck plays Lily Powers, a young woman working in a speakeasy run by her father, who also prostitutes her to his customers. When her father dies (seemingly because she refused the advances of a politician who’d threatened the speakeasy’s existence), Lily finds herself adrift, until she runs across a family friend who introduces her to Nietzsche—as a woman in her position, her choices are to be exploited, or to be the one who does the exploiting. This sets her to climbing the corporate ladder at a Manhattan bank using sex as a tool. The plot turns on a moment that takes place before all that, when Lily and her friend Chico (Theresa Harris) hop a freight train bound for New York. When discovered by a railroad worker, Lily trades sex for a promise that they won’t be reported. The scene makes clear that Lily knows sexuality is a commodity to be used to her own best advantage, and is not something for men to control. You can rent Baby Face from Prime Video.


Mulholland Drive (2001)

Analyzing any given David Lynch movie points us immediately toward the problem of determining whether a sex scene is “necessary to the plot,” since figuring out the plot is a trick unto itself. Mulholland Drive is a tiny bit more approachable than most of his output, following “Rita” (Laura Herring), an actress who suffers from amnesia following a Los Angeles car crash, who stumbles into a wholesome midwestern transplant (Naomi Watts), who is setting out to become a star. The two set out to uncover Rita’s true identity, before engaging in some undeniably hot sex. I’m not sure to what extent it impacts the plot, but the sex scene represents a liminal moment between the two characters, each inhabiting multiple potential identities—for those few moments, the characters connect with such intimacy that questions of identity don’t matter in the least. You can stream Mulholland Drive on Paramount+ or rent it from Prime Video.


Y Tu Mamá También (2001)

The climax (ahem) of Alfonso Cuarón’s instant-classic Mexican road trip film finds the central characters (Luisa, Julio, and Tenoch) engaging in a rather sweet threesome. The trio have been circling one another, emotionally and physically, for the entire film, and this moment flips the script, briefly, on their apparent love triangle—offering the possibility that none of them needs to choose. You can stream Y Tu Mamá También on Hulu and Netflix or rent it from Prime Video.


Party Girl (1995)

A bit of a spoiler here, since the key moment comes toward the climax (ahem). The always brilliant Parker Posey plays Mary, the party girl of the title, who takes a job at a public library in order to pay back bail money she owes after being arrested for hosting an illegal rave. She eventually takes to the work, but also to smart Lebanese street vendor Mustafa (Omar Townsend), who hopes to become a teacher. After hours, the two consummate their romance in the library where she works—a fitting, if slightly on-the-nose sequence that solidifies Mary’s transformation from a pure party girl, to a party girl who also has a sweet boyfriend and knows the Dewey Decimal System inside and out. You can stream Party Girl on Peacock, Hulu, Kanopy, The Criterion Channel, and Prime Video.


Eyes Wide Shut (1999)

Forget about the orgy sequence; let’s focus instead on the earlier sex scene between Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman that formed the basis of the scandalous teaser trailer (a true tease back when no one knew what the movie was going to be about). She’s mostly focused on looking at herself in the mirror, and while the scene approaches something sweaty, what we mostly feel is the lack of connection between the two. In the context of the film, the sequence makes clear this is a marriage already in the process of disintegrating. You can rent Eyes Wide Shut from Prime Video.


Don’t Look Now (1973)

Nicolas Roeg’s haunting thriller includes one of the most notorious sex scenes in film history, infamous in part because of rumors (still promulgated and still disputed) that the intimate contact between Julie Christie and Donald Sutherland was unsimulated. Whether there’s any truth to that or not, it certainly speaks to the authenticity of the moment, which is hardly gratuitous: The movie follows a couple shattered by the death of their only child, and the sex scene is a major emotional turning point: a moment of clear connection right before things go even more wrong. You can stream Don’t Look Now on Kanopy or rent it from Prime Video.


Call Me By Your Name (2017)

Mainstream movies with gay themes are frequently prudish in the extreme—assuming that audiences might accept the existence of queer people, but not that they might also come now and again. During the sweaty Italian summer of 1983, a frustrated 17-year-old Elio (Tomothée Chalamet) makes reasonably good use of a ripe peach, only to be discovered by Oliver (Armie Hammer)…who finds his own use for the bit of fruit. The scenes captures their character dynamic nearly in full, while offering up something a tiny bit kinkier than we’re used to. You can stream Call Me by Your Name on Max or rent it from Prime Video.


North by Northwest (1959)

OK, maybe it’s not entirely essential to the plot, and the sex here is only strongly implied—but Hitchcock’s classic caper gets extra credit for being so brazen about it, considering when it was produced. As Cary Grant and Eva Marie Saint begin making out in the top bunk of their train berth, Hitch cuts away (as the censors would have surely demanded) and we watch the train plowing into a tunnel. What plays like a juvenile joke now was a clear middle finger directed at the Hollywood production code. You can rent North by Northwest from Prime Video.


My Beautiful Laundrette (1985)

Fairly chaste as sex scenes go, but the backroom tumble involving Daniel Day-Lewis and Gordon Warnecke is important, in part, because it is so low-key. There’s drama around this same-sex, interracial relationship…but on the folding table in the back of the laundromat, it’s just desire. You can stream My Beautiful Laundrette on Prime Video and Pluto TV.


Happy Together (1997)

This Wong Kar-wai film stars Tony Leung and Leslie Cheung as a pair of desperately mismatched lovers whose passion nonetheless keeps bringing them back together. Happy Together opens with the two in their underwear, on a bed in South America. Their kissing turns to tussling, then to wrestling, then to sex, and back again, their entire dynamic laid out in one impressively intense scene. You can stream Happy Together on Max and The Criterion Channel or rent it from Prime Video.


I Am Curious (Yellow) (1967)

Lena Nyman stars in this wildly controversial (in 1967, anyway) Swedish film that uses documentary style to tell the story of a 20-year-old exploring the world as an adult for the first time, and finding her own passion for social justice challenged and expanded. Sex goes right alongside politics for Lena (also her character’s name), and one of the key, ostensibly shocking scenes finds her gently kissing her boyfriend’s flaccid penis. It’s a moment in Lena’s growth as a young activist and as a sexual being, but it’s also a rare instance of male nudity on the movie screen—particularly way back in the 1960s. You can stream I Am Curious (Yellow) on The Criterion Channel.


It Follows (2015)

It Follows isn’t about just one thing, but there’s certainly a pervasive air of tension around young sexuality and its potential consequences, both physical and emotional. Fear of sexually transmitted infections is certainly a lens through which to view the movie’s horror conceit—a curse that literally follows its subjects to their deaths, unless (and until) they’re willing to pass it along to someone else via sex. Pairing sex and existential dread is a choice, but a choice worth exploring. You can stream It Follows on Max or buy it from Prime Video.


Halloween (1978)

Best not to hold Halloween responsible for the many, many imitators that got it all wrong: The slasher genre that this film helped to solidify quickly became laughably sexually conservative in a “sex = death” kinda way, but that wasn’t this movie’s message. Director John Carpenter wrote most of the scary stuff, but late, great producer Debra Hill wrote everything involving Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) and her friends. When Lynda (P.J. Soles) and Bob (John Michael Graham) have sex and get killed, the only intent was to show teens doing normal teen stuff. They were meant to be relatable, not sinners getting what was coming to them. You can stream Halloween on AMC+ and Shudder or rent it from Prime Video.


Bound (1996)

The sex scenes between ex-con Corky (Gina Gershon) and Mafia moll Violet (Jennifer Tilly) are as sensual and erotic as they come, sidestepping then- and still-common cinematic lesbian tropes in favor of genuine sexiness. Nothing here feels like it’s strictly intended for the straight white gaze, even though the movie toys with that notion in the ways the relationship between the two women eggs on the very straight male insecurities of mobster Caesar (Joe Pantoliano). The Wachowskis hired feminist author and sex educator Susie Bright (who has a cameo in the movie) as an intimacy coordinator before that job even had a name. The finished product makes a very strong case that having someone around who understands sex and intimacy does’t put a damper on things; quite the opposite. You can stream Bound on Pluto TV or rent it from Prime Video.


The Living End (1992)

Gregg Araki’s New Queer Cinema masterpiece is as angry as it is jubilant. In an era where queer people were either invisible in cinema, or victims, Araki crafted a narrative about a couple of gay, HIV+ drifters who kill a homophobic cop and a couple of gay bashers before setting out on an uninhibited road trip. Their shower sex scene isn’t particularly graphic, but the explicit non-use of a condom and the light choking involved outraged audiences from across the political spectrum—though the movie’s dedication to: ”The hundreds of thousands who’ve died and the hundreds of thousands more who will die because of a big white house full of Republican Fuckheads” was more on-the-nose about its intention to offend the wrong type of people. You can stream The Living End on Kanopy or rent it from Prime Video.


The Ice Storm (1997)

Director Ann Lee caps the incredibly awkward, instantly regrettable car sex scene between Elena (Joan Allen) and Jim (Jamie Sheridan) with him admitting, “That was awful.” In a movie that’s all about awkward and ill-conceived sexual encounters, Jim sums it up nicely. You can rent The Ice Storm from Prime Video.


Body Heat (1981)

Kathleen Turner stars in Lawrence Kasdan’s essential neo-noir as one of cinema’s ultimate femmes fatale—matching the energy of Barbara Stanwyck in Double Indemnity, on which this is loosely based, but wearing much less clothing. As in the best noir films, the sex here is all part of the game that she’s playing with William Hurt, even as he thinks that he’s the one toying with her. When he finally smashes a window just to be with her again, it’s clear who’s in charge. You can rent Body Heat from Prime Video.


When Harry Met Sally… (1989)

OK, there is no actual sex here, but there is a wildly memorable scene centered around a full-throated discussion of a woman’s orgasm. Which was not something that was spoken of in polite company circa 1989! Writer/director Nora Ephron didn’t care, and Meg Ryan played it to the hilt. So iconic was the scene that “I’ll have what she’s having…” became a catchphrase, and Miss Piggy offered up her own climax on an episode of Muppets Tonight. If we still have a long way to go, this scene certainly opened some doors for more transparent discussions of women’s sexuality. You can rent When Harry Met Sally… from Prime Video.


Female Trouble (1974)

Following a Christmas celebration gone horribly awry (they shoulda gotten her them cha-cha heels!), young Dawn Davenport (Divine) strikes out on her own, hitchhiking and then immediately having an unprotected, and unhinged sexual encounter with a lecherous creep on an old mattress at the dump. Not only is the scene itself one of the most memorably repellant bits in the entire movie, it also sets in motion everything to come: Dawn isn’t entirely cut out to be a single mother, and trying to raise Taffy (Mink Stole) only sends her further down the road to depravity. The sex scenes in basically any Waters movie are similarly obscene, which is entirely the point, and entirely necessary. You can buy Female Trouble from Prime Video.


The Watermelon Woman (1996)

It was the sex scene that all but broke the National Endowment for the Arts. Cheryl Dunye plays herself in this faux-documentary following a filmmaker looking to unearth the story of the “Watermelon Woman,” a fictional Black actress from the early days of Hollywood. Genevieve Turner plays Diana, a more overtly confident white woman who flirts with Cheryl as a customer of the video store where she works. This leads to a sweet, but also steamy sex scene, described by City Paper reviewer Jeannine DeLombard as “the hottest dyke sex scene on celluloid”—a bit of an exaggeration, but it’s up there, while also being a key moment of personal growth for the sometimes-awkward Cheryl.

That blurb made its way to conservative columnist Julia Duin, who decried the film sight-unseen, demanding to know why taxpayers were spending money on lesbian filth (I’m sure that the characters’ mixed skin tones had nothing to do with it). The debate made it all the way to the floor in Congress, where politicians tried to claw back the production’s $31,000 grant. They ultimately settled on a restructuring of the program so that grants could go only to specific projects, rather than organizations. That, my friends, is a demonstration of the power of hot gay sex to fill the hearts of the dull with jealous rage. You can stream The Watermelon Woman on The Criterion Channel and Kanopy or rent it from Prime Video.


Law of Desire (1987)

Antonio Banderas becomes both an object of terror, and a muse, following a gentle, lighthearted sex scene between porn-director-on-the-rebound Pablo (Eusebio Poncela) and same-sex virgin Antonio (Banderas). The cute, frank love scene sets up, and helps to subvert, everything that comes after—with director Pedro Almodóvar peppering his thriller with comedy and subverting expectations, as is his usual MO. You can rent Law of Desire from Prime Video.


The Last Temptation of Christ (1988)

Martin Scorsese’s oft-banned portrait of the final days of Christ (Willem Dafoe) pissed off a lot of people for its hallucinatory sex scene between Jesus and Mary Magdalene (Barbara Hershey). The scene itself isn’t even PG-13 level, but the very idea sent scolds into apoplexy and fanatics off to firebomb theaters. Unsurprisingly, they’d missed the point entirely: In context, the scene is part of a ploy by Satan—the titular last temptation. He’s showing Jesus what his reward might be if he turned away from mankind: a long and normal life instead of an agonizing death on the cross. That moment of lovemaking is central to the sequence, and helps to make clear everything he’s sacrificing for humanity. You can stream The Last Temptation of Christ on Prime Video.


Tangerine (2015)

Sean Baker’s brilliant, ultra-low-budget comedy-drama follows a Christmas Eve in the life of trans sex workers Sin-Dee Rella (Kitana Kiki Rodriguez) and Alexandra (Mya Taylor). The sometimes funny, sometimes heartbreaking film rides high on gritty realism, and it wouldn’t be the same if it didn’t give us a sense of their work lives. A central scene finds Alexandra taking refuge from a bad day in the car of a cab-driver client. He’s happy about giving her a blowjob while they go through a car wash, and she’s happy to earn a few extra dollars from a friendly, trustworthy client. As car wash blowjobs go, it’s genuinely sweet, while also making clear that sex workers, too, have their good and bad days on the job. You can stream Tangerine on Max or rent it from Prime Video.

Stephen A. Smith says he would have ‘immediately’ taken swing at LeBron James had Lakers star touched him in confrontation

The ongoing Stephen A. Smith-LeBron James feud has escalated.

A very public back and forth between the ESPN pundit and Los Angeles Lakers star continued Wednesday night when Smith went on his live YouTube show and responded to James blasting him on ESPN’s “Pat McAfee Show” earlier in the day. Smith then opened Thursday’s “First Take” with a monologue about the situation.

The crux of the conversation is Smith’s coverage of James’ son Bronny. LeBron approached Smith courtside during a March 6 Lakers game, reportedly saying ‘Yo, you gotta stop talking s*** about my son. You gotta stop f***ing with my son. That’s my son, that’s my son!'”

Smith was not amused, saying James’ confrontation was ‘bulls*** and weak.” James said his part Wednesday by painting the incident as him protecting his family.

Hours later, Smith had a lot more to say.

First, he said he has no issue with his ESPN colleague in McAfee bringing James on to criticize him, as that’s the nature of their line of work. Then he accused James of lying about his coverage of Bronny and whipped out a Chris Rock-Will Smith comparison.

Smith claimed that had James touched him, he would have taken a swing at the Lakers star then immediately experienced a bad time:

“I just want to say for the record LeBron James is full of it and in this particular instance, as it pertains to his son, he is a liar. He went on national television today and he lied again. You see, when he approached me while I was sitting courtside at that game against the New York Knicks, when he rolled up on me, I didn’t know he was going to roll up on me. I had no idea, but when he said what he had to say, I was in no position to give any kind of retort without making a scene. 

“It was during the third quarter, it was fresh out of a timeout, it was him walking to the basketball court, it was on national television, the cameras were rolling and had I done something, what do y’all want me to do? Do you want this to be a reincarnation of Chris Rock and Will Smith? 

Let me state for the record that while we bring up that, let me assure you it wouldn’t have gone down like that. I would have gotten my ass kicked, because had that man put his hands on me, I would have immediately swung on him. Immediately. That, I’m not going to tolerate. But I knew he wasn’t going to do something like that. 

James responded hours later on Instagram, with a video of Smith doing some training.

To be fair to Smith, he was pretty clear that taking a swing at James would have not gone well.

As expected, Smith had something to say about James’ Instagram post Thursday. In a lengthy monologue on “First Take,” Smith said James was “in his feelings.” Smith also claimed James was holding a grudge because Smith believes Michael Jordan is the basketball GOAT.

“He puts out some page about me boxing and all of this other stuff from a decade ago with two torn rotator cuffs, fine, no problem. It’s very, very embarrassing video, I’ll be the first to say and all that stuff. Even though I like it to be left up there because if people think I want to throw hands like that, that’s how I throw hands, knock yourself out. I’m good with that. I know that the man today is not the man that I was a decade ago, physically and beyond. I can tell you that.

So, we get that out the way. Why do I bring that up? Because that’s how petty you’ve become? You’re LeBron James. You’re that butt hurt over the things that I’m saying that you would post that video. When has LeBron James ever done something like that? But suddenly you’re doing that as it pertains to me. This man is in his feelings. I wonder why? 

Could it be because I don’t believe you’re the GOAT? Because I’ll never believe you’re the GOAT? Because I have you No. 2 at all times? 

Smith then praised James for all his accomplishments away from the course, but said James only care about being called the GOAT.

Again, it was Smith’s comments about Bronny that started this whole back-and-forth. Smith’s overall position was essentially that he has fairly covered Bronny’s NBA career, which began when he was selected by his father’s team in the second round of the 2024 NBA Draft. Bronny has seen sporadic minutes as a rookie, moving between the Lakers and their G League affiliate in South Bay.

Stephen A. Smith had a few more things to say to LeBron James. (Photo by Paras Griffin/Getty Images)
Paras Griffin via Getty Images

Smith claims that James has interpreted a statement of fact as excessively harsh criticism of his son, whom James had been open for years about getting to the NBA so they could play together:

“I’m getting very annoyed at people who cover the game of basketball, who cover professional sports, pundits out there including him, his inner circle, his family members and everybody else included, when are y’all going to ask him or hold him accountable for the truth. I have not been talking about Bronny James. I have not, as LeBron James accused me of doing to my face, been s***ting on his son.

“It was not clapping back at his son. You’re second-round pick, 55th overall, there have been plenty of second-round picks that have worked their way up through the ranks before getting to the pro level. Me pointing that out about his son and talking about how his son has been pushed to the forefront, thereby putting him in a line of fire for folks in the media to come at him, is not denigrating his son. It’s simply highlighting what we all knew, which is he’s not ready yet.

Smith went on to praise Bronny’s recent performance, which included a career-high 17 points in a game the Lakers were significantly short-handed and a 39-point eruption in the G League on Monday.

Another idea Smith objected to was the notion he was doing all this for ratings. He was frank about the dynamics at play there:

“I don’t need something like this to happen to talk about LeBron. He plays for the Lakers. He is LeBron James. I don’t need an incident like this to talk about LeBron James. 

“Do I use him for ratings? You’re damn right. Because I use anything in the news for ratings, because I’m a reporter and a personality and a pundit and a commentator. That’s my career. Of course I talk about him. Of course I talk about anything relevant in the news.”

Clearly, Smith is bothered about how this is going down. As for James, well, he began Wednesday’s game against the Indiana Pacers with only three points on 0-for-6 shooting in the first three quarters before posting 10 in the fourth and tipping in a game-winning buzzer-beater.