Jayson Tatum reacts to Bill Chisholm purchasing Celtics

Jayson Tatum reacts to Bill Chisholm purchasing Celtics originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

Boston Celtics star Jayson Tatum is optimistic about the franchise’s future under new majority owner Bill Chisholm.

Chisholm, a Massachusetts native and Dartmouth College graduate, purchased a majority stake in the team at a $6.1-billion valuation. The lifelong Celtics fan is the managing director and co-founder of private equity firm Symphony Technology Group.

On Friday, Tatum explained why he believes Chisholm could be the right fit for the organization.

“I mean, just everything you all heard,” Tatum said. “Grew up around the area, big Boston fan, is proud of what we’ve accomplished and understands what the Celtics mean to the city and to the NBA. Wanted to be a part of that and help take it forward any way he can.”

Tatum and fellow Celtics star Jaylen Brown weren’t caught off guard by the ownership change. Longtime team owner Wyc Grousbeck kept them informed throughout the sale process and assured them it would be a smooth transition.

When asked how much he had thought about the team sale during the season, Tatum responded, “Not much. I talked to Wyc a few times. He’s still going to be around, and he kept me updated, saying whoever takes over will be great for the organization. I told Wyc I trust him, and I have no doubt things will continue to run smoothly.”

Grousbeck revealed after the sale that Chisholm asked him to stay on as CEO and governor for the next three seasons, and he is “glad to do so.”

Chisholm takes over a Celtics team with its sights set on its second consecutive NBA championship. Boston entered Friday with a 50-19 record that puts it on track for the No. 2 seed in the Eastern Conference.

Watch NBC Sports Boston’s exclusive interview with Chisholm and Grousbeck below or on YouTube:

These DeWalt Tools Are Up to 57% Off Right Now

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

If you’re looking for tools to up your DIY game, you’ve probably noticed that they can be expensive. Buying new tools to expand a set or replace worn-out ones adds up quickly, but having the right tool for the project you’re working on can cut your work time in half and get you better results. DeWalt tools are on sale right now on Amazon for up to 57% off, so you can build out your toolkit without spending your whole DIY budget.

Cordless tools sets

If you’re building out a new set of cordless tools, a combo set is a good way to get started. Sets will come with the chargers and batteries you need to run your tools, along with the tools themselves. These sets are on sale to make starting a cordless tool set cheaper.

  • The DeWalt 20-volt drill and driver combo set is on sale for $124.00, 48% off its regular price. The set includes a 20-volt drill, a 20-volt, quarter-inch impact driver, two 1.5-amp batteries, a 20-volt charger, and a tool bag. This is a good starter kit for doing beginner DIY projects like hanging shelves or mounting a TV on the wall.

  • The DeWalt 20-volt 9-tool set comes with a 20-volt drill, a 20-volt impact driver, a 6-½ inch circular saw, a reciprocating saw, a 4-½ inch angle grinder, an oscillating tool, a ⅜ inch right angle drill/driver, a work light, a Bluetooth speaker, two 20-volt, 2-amp-hour batteries, a 20-volt charger, and two tool bags. It’s on sale for $599.99, 37% off its regular price. This kit is a good foundation for a robust DIY tool set, but it only comes with two batteries, so if you plan to use multiple tools at a time, you might consider getting one or two more batteries and an extra charger so you can keep going while your spare batteries charge.

Tools only deals

If you already have a DeWalt cordless tool set, you can still get a good deal on expanding your kit. Tool-only deals are great if you already have batteries and chargers and need a specific tool since you likely don’t need more batteries or chargers to use it.

  • The DeWalt 20-volt, hand-held flashlight/work light is on sale for $35.84, 57% off its typical price. The flashlight is small, but you can also use the ring at the top to hang it and use it as a work light.

  • The DeWalt 20-volt, 6 ½ inch circular saw is on sale for $99, 38% off its usual price. The saw comes with one fast-cut wood blade included, but no battery.

  • The DeWalt 20-volt, 4 ½ inch angle grinder is on sale for $121.25, 45% off its typical price. It comes with a side handle, but no grinder wheel, so you’ll need to pick out an appropriate wheel or blade to use it.

  • The DeWalt 20-volt reciprocating saw is on sale for $119.99, 50% off its regular price. It doesn’t come with blades or batteries, so you’ll need those to use your saw.

  • The DeWalt 20-volt, 18GA narrow-crown stapler is on sale for $224.95, 47% off its usual price. This tool can drive staples without the need for a pneumatic air tank.

  • The DeWalt self-leveling laser is on sale for $166.99, 37% off its typical price. It has a 100-foot throw and can be used for leveling decking, shelves, drywall, grading gravels, and plumbing posts.

Batteries and bits

If you already have a DeWalt set and you need bits or to replace or expand your batteries, there are some good deals on these tools as well. Having the right bits and adapter can help you get your DIY projects finished without so many trips to the hardware store.

  • The DeWalt 40-piece impact bit set is on sale for $24.53, $39% off its regular price. This set includes several driver tip types, a bit extender for hard-to-reach spots, and a quarter-inch adapter for sockets.

  • A set of two DeWalt 20-volt, 5-amp-hour Powerstack batteries is on sale for $187.49, 46% off its regular price. These batteries are lighter and smaller than traditional lithium-ion batteries, so they can be helpful on longer jobs where you need to use your tools for several hours.

The Best Ways to Prevent Countertop Appliances From Damaging Your Kitchen

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

The kitchen tends to be the heart of the home—it’s where we gather to share meals, nibble on snacks, and talk about our day. It’s also a pretty dangerous place. Aside from open flames, slippery floors, and flammable gas that is literally pumped into our homes, the innocuous little appliances that crowd our countertops can also represent real dangers.

More than 150,000 people head to their local emergency room every year after an accident involving a household appliance of some sort. Small appliances might seem safe enough sitting on your kitchen counters, but they can be extremely dangerous if defective, misused, or placed in the wrong spot. Aside from the danger of hurting yourself, a misplaced countertop appliance can actually damage your home, as well. Here’s what you need to think about when you’re deciding where to place everything in your kitchen.

General rules to keep in mind

If you want your kitchen to be as safe as possible, there are a few basic safety rules that apply to any countertop appliance:

  • Keep stuff away from water. Don’t operate any electric appliances near sinks, pot-fillers, or any other sources of running water. This protects against electrical dangers and keeps the dangerous bacteria growing in your average sink from infiltrating your food.

  • Plug into ground-fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs). All your kitchen appliances should be plugged into GFCIs. Before 2023 only appliances located near water sources were required to be plugged into GFCIs, but the National Electrical Code was changed to include any kitchen appliance. These special outlets are designed to cut off to prevent electric shock, and using them reduces the chances that your countertop appliance will hurt you or damage your home.

  • Never use extension cords. Even if the cord is plugged into a GFCI outlet, it’s a bad idea. Many countertop appliances like air fryers or microwaves pull a lot of juice, and can melt most standard home-use extension cords, leading to serious fire danger.

  • Keep away from the stove. You shouldn’t place any countertop appliance near (or, lord help us, on) your stove. The heat and open flames can melt power cords, increasing the risk of a fire or other accident.

  • Keep away from the edge. If your countertop is crowded and something has to sit right on the outer edge, it’s time for a reorganization. Having any appliance right near the edge of the counter is just an invitation to disaster.

While these rules apply to any appliance, there are specific placement considerations for several countertop appliances.

Toasters and toaster ovens

The heating element in a toaster oven can reach 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, and some toaster ovens can heat up to 600 degrees under specific settings. That’s pretty hot, and while even the cheapest toaster has some built-in safety features, placement matters. Never place a toaster or toaster oven on anything flammable, like a towel. If you’re concerned about your countertop being damaged from the heat (though most toasters and toaster ovens are designed to be placed safely on standard countertop materials, even wood), you can place it on a nonflammable surface like a silicone mat or even a piece of stone tile.

You should also never put anything on top of your toaster oven (or toaster). Yes, it’s taking up valuable counter space, but whatever you put on top could potentially be damaged from the heat, or even catch fire.

Coffee maker

You might think that your humble coffee maker is pretty safe, but it might be doing long-term damage to your kitchen cabinets and walls because of one by-product of the coffee-making process: Steam. That hot, moist stuff drifts up and if it regularly interacts with your cabinets, it can cause a lot of damage, warping and staining wood and discoloring other materials. Since the most affected area will be under the cabinets, you can cause a lot of damage before it’s easily noticeable.

Always place your coffee maker away from the upper cabinets when you use it, and make sure your kitchen always has robust ventilation, especially when using any heat- or moisture-producing appliances.

Pressure cookers

Aside from being a time bomb if misused, pressure cookers pose the same steam threat as coffee makers: As they work, they emit steam, and continuous exposure to that steam can damage your cabinetry and walls. You can try aiming the pressure valve away from the cabinets, and you can buy steam diverters that redirect the steam. But your best bet is to operate the pressure cooker away from your cabinets.

Air fryers

Air fryers are very popular, and just like the other appliances on this list, they can damage your walls or cabinets with superheated fumes. Aside from the damage that steam can do, they can also scorch walls and cabinets if placed too close or with insufficient ventilation, so always place them with plenty of space around them.

Air fryers also get pretty hot, so just like toaster ovens, you shouldn’t place them on top of towels or anything else that could conceivably catch fire.

Slow cookers

Slow cookers pose the same steam dangers as pressure cookers, but can be even more damaging because of the “slow” part. While occasional use of a pressure cooker or other steamy appliance probably won’t destroy a cabinet or stain a wall, occasional use of a slow cooker is more likely to because of the duration of operation.

It’s best to place your slow cooker away from the walls and cabinets, and never place it on or near anything flammable. And because of the duration of use, you should place your slow cooker on a metal trivet or heat-resistant mat to protect the surface underneath.

The 75 million reasons — and more — Cooper Flagg not returning to Duke, will enter NBA draft

Nobody in the NBA believes it will happen — and there are more than $75 million reasons why.

As Cooper Flagg leads Duke into the NCAA Tournament Friday — where they are among the favorites to be standing on stage in San Antonio holding up the NCAA Championship trophy — there will be talk about Flagg returning to Duke for another season. He has said he’s thought about it, even telling The Athletic,” S***, I want to come back next year.”

Wanting to is one thing — the college experience can be special, and Flagg is young at age 18 — but actually doing it is another. It can’t be stressed enough that nobody in the NBA thinks Flagg will pass up being the No. 1 pick in the 2025 NBA Draft to return to Durham, North Carolina, for another season. There are $75 million reasons why, but they break down into two key areas.

Injury risk

Flagg would likely be the No. 1 pick in 2026 as well — although the 2026 NBA Draft is deeper with projected franchise players including A.J. Dybantsa, Cameron Boozer, Nate Ament and Darryn Peterson — but the biggest risk is a major injury.

Every time any player steps on the court there is the risk of injury, but for Flagg it could have massive financial consequences. First, a significant knee, back, or foot injury could put doubt in the minds of the always risk-averse general managers picking at the top of the 2026 draft. With other high-level players available who teams like, Flagg could fall down draft boards.

More concerning, he might not be the same player physically. Scouts NBC Sports has spoken with believe Flagg could well become an All-NBA player — top 15 in the league — and saying he becomes a top-five player in the league who garners MVP votes someday is undoubtedly possible. A significant injury could put that in jeopardy, or at least lead to a career when his injury status is as discussed as much as how great he is when healthy (think Zion Williamson or Kawhi Leonard, for example).

Money

However, the real reason Flagg likely enters the 2025 NBA Draft is money — next season and beyond.

This season it is estimated Flagg makes about $4.8 million in NIL money (those figures are not official and public), which would be the most of any college basketball player and trails only Texas quarterback Arch Manning ($6.5 million) in all of college sports. If Flagg returned to Duke, maybe deals could be found to increase that number — but not enough to match the rookie scale salary of the NBA. Last year’s No. 1 pick, Zaccharie Risacher of the Atlanta Hawks, is making $13.6 million this season in salary alone and will make $57 million over the first four years of his rookie contract (and Flagg’s contract would be larger as the NBA salary cap will go up by 10% this season.

And that’s not the “real” money. Flagg staying in college would delay starting the clock on his second contract, where the real generational wealth will come into play. This coming summer, sure-fire rookie contract max extension players such as Cade Cunningham and Evan Mobley can sign five-year deals worth $224.3 million — at least. Make an All-NBA team (or be named MVP or Defensive Player of the Year) in that stretch and the max can jump to $269 million. Years from now, when Flagg would be eligible, that max extension will be more.

Then there’s the longer-term, on the back end of Flagg’s future NBA career, which Bobby Marx of ESPN discussed.

ESPN’s Bobby Marks projects that Flagg returning to Duke could cost him, based on estimated cap numbers, $75 million to $125 million in potential salary on the backend of his NBA career since he would delay the start of his service clock for his second and third pro contracts. Players with 10 years of service are eligible for a supermax deal, a type of contract extension in which teams can give eligible players up to 35% of the total cap space allotted to that team for up to five years.

It’s too much money to leave on the table.

There is no doubt Flagg loves Duke and his college experience — he’s just 18, and he may love it more by the time the NCAA Tournament ends. However, taking less money in the short- and long-term while adding increased injury risk is just not smart. And Flagg, if nothing else, is smart. He will enter the 2025 NBA Draft and go No. 1. Around the NBA, there is no doubt.

Fact or Fiction: The NBA season is too long

Each week during the 2024-25 NBA season, we will take a deeper dive into some of the league’s biggest storylines in an attempt to determine whether trends are based more in fact or fiction moving forward.

[Last week: The NBA is ridiculous (in a good way)]


Injuries, load management and tanking. They might be the three worst aspects of the NBA.

And all of them could benefit from a shortened season.

Whatever data you examine, injuries are being diagnosed with greater frequency in the NBA. The percentage of games missed per season has risen from roughly 15% to 20% — or about four more games per player per season — over the past 25 years, according to a New York City Data Science Academy study. Other studies show a steady increase since the 1980s and a spike in recent seasons, including this one.

LeBron James has missed seven games with a groin injury. (Brad Penner-Imagn Images)
IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect / Reuters

We can debate how much of that is the result of medical advancements in the reporting of injuries, but there is no doubt that the increases in 1) demand at the youth level, 2) athleticism of the players and 3) the ground they have to cover in the pace-and-space era have all contributed to a heightened injury risk.

Not only would there be fewer instances in which a player could be injured, a shortened season would decrease the amount of fatigue that leads to further instances of wear and tear. Even shortening the season from 82 games to, say, 72 — two games each against every interconference opponent and three apiece opposite each intraconference rival — could eliminate back-to-back games from the schedule.

This should also address load management. The NBA recently instituted a 65-game rule for players to qualify for All-NBA and other awards statuses, which gives you an idea that the league believes this — an 80% threshold — is a pretty good snapshot to assess someone’s season. Why not just make that the length of the season and aim to get everyone to play 100% of a campaign. Shouldn’t that be the goal?

It stands to reason that tanking would decrease in a shortened season, too. Teams would be in the hunt deeper into the year, and we could eliminate the tail end of that stretch of each season — the time period we are currently in — when a large contingent of teams have committed themselves to losing.

If it makes so much sense to shorten the season, why hasn’t the NBA done it already? Money.

The answer is always money.

Depending on the market, teams can generate as much as $5 million in revenue per game. Eliminating even 10 games would cut into the profit margin for some teams or could erase it entirely for others. That is a problem. Team owners are not about to set fire to their income, even if franchise values are absurd.

However, a scarcity of games, combined with an increase in frequency of player availability, would improve the product greatly, and better products sell for more money. That may not be great news for a consumer that is already paying a small fortune to attend a game, but it is better than the alternative.

Because right now a lot of people are paying for one product and receiving another, far worse one.

The Denver Nuggets played a pair of nationally televised games this week against the Golden State Warriors and Los Angeles Lakers; Nikola Jokić and Jamal Murray missed both to nagging injuries. Games across the slate at this time of year feature a litany of player absences for injuries, load management or tanking, and the combination of all three makes for a watered-down league struggling for air space amid March Madness.

A total of 21 players who made an All-Star or All-NBA team in this or the previous three seasons did not participate in Wednesday’s 11-game schedule, according to Yahoo Sports contributor Tom Haberstroh. Imagine paying hundreds of dollars to see the Philadelphia 76ers visit the Oklahoma City Thunder, only for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Joel Embiid, Paul George and Tyrese Maxey to miss the game.

Pick most any random game from the NBA’s mid-March slate, and you will find a similar scenario. Over time that sends a message: Do not invest in the league at this time of year. The gamble is not worth it. It does feel like we are just playing out the remainder of the season with few stakes but a higher seed here and there. The title favorites and, for the most part, the playoff field have long since been established. Shortening the season does nothing to eliminate the thrill of a playoff hunt; it only heightens it, in fact.

Why not instead invest in the overall health of the league over that time? Shortening the season would not only make more players available in the immediate; it should in theory extend their careers. For a league that prides itself on selling nostalgia in real time, that is no small auxiliary gain from fewer games.

It makes a lot of sense for a lot of reasons and no sense for one reason — the financial gain of a league that sold its latest franchise for $6.1 billion. Which is why it won’t happen. That doesn’t mean it shouldn’t.

Determination: Fact. The NBA season is too long.

Fact or Fiction: The NBA season is too long

Each week during the 2024-25 NBA season, we will take a deeper dive into some of the league’s biggest storylines in an attempt to determine whether trends are based more in fact or fiction moving forward.

[Last week: The NBA is ridiculous (in a good way)]


Injuries, load management and tanking. They might be the three worst aspects of the NBA.

And all of them could benefit from a shortened season.

Whatever data you examine, injuries are being diagnosed with greater frequency in the NBA. The percentage of games missed per season has risen from roughly 15% to 20% — or about four more games per player per season — over the past 25 years, according to a New York City Data Science Academy study. Other studies show a steady increase since the 1980s and a spike in recent seasons, including this one.

LeBron James has missed seven games with a groin injury. (Brad Penner-Imagn Images)
IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect / Reuters

We can debate how much of that is the result of medical advancements in the reporting of injuries, but there is no doubt that the increases in 1) demand at the youth level, 2) athleticism of the players and 3) the ground they have to cover in the pace-and-space era have all contributed to a heightened injury risk.

Not only would there be fewer instances in which a player could be injured, a shortened season would decrease the amount of fatigue that leads to further instances of wear and tear. Even shortening the season from 82 games to, say, 72 — two games each against every interconference opponent and three apiece opposite each intraconference rival — could eliminate back-to-back games from the schedule.

This should also address load management. The NBA recently instituted a 65-game rule for players to qualify for All-NBA and other awards statuses, which gives you an idea that the league believes this — an 80% threshold — is a pretty good snapshot to assess someone’s season. Why not just make that the length of the season and aim to get everyone to play 100% of a campaign. Shouldn’t that be the goal?

It stands to reason that tanking would decrease in a shortened season, too. Teams would be in the hunt deeper into the year, and we could eliminate the tail end of that stretch of each season — the time period we are currently in — when a large contingent of teams have committed themselves to losing.

If it makes so much sense to shorten the season, why hasn’t the NBA done it already? Money.

The answer is always money.

Depending on the market, teams can generate as much as $5 million in revenue per game. Eliminating even 10 games would cut into the profit margin for some teams or could erase it entirely for others. That is a problem. Team owners are not about to set fire to their income, even if franchise values are absurd.

However, a scarcity of games, combined with an increase in frequency of player availability, would improve the product greatly, and better products sell for more money. That may not be great news for a consumer that is already paying a small fortune to attend a game, but it is better than the alternative.

Because right now a lot of people are paying for one product and receiving another, far worse one.

The Denver Nuggets played a pair of nationally televised games this week against the Golden State Warriors and Los Angeles Lakers; Nikola Jokić and Jamal Murray missed both to nagging injuries. Games across the slate at this time of year feature a litany of player absences for injuries, load management or tanking, and the combination of all three makes for a watered-down league struggling for air space amid March Madness.

A total of 21 players who made an All-Star or All-NBA team in this or the previous three seasons did not participate in Wednesday’s 11-game schedule, according to Yahoo Sports contributor Tom Haberstroh. Imagine paying hundreds of dollars to see the Philadelphia 76ers visit the Oklahoma City Thunder, only for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Joel Embiid, Paul George and Tyrese Maxey to miss the game.

Pick most any random game from the NBA’s mid-March slate, and you will find a similar scenario. Over time that sends a message: Do not invest in the league at this time of year. The gamble is not worth it. It does feel like we are just playing out the remainder of the season with few stakes but a higher seed here and there. The title favorites and, for the most part, the playoff field have long since been established. Shortening the season does nothing to eliminate the thrill of a playoff hunt; it only heightens it, in fact.

Why not instead invest in the overall health of the league over that time? Shortening the season would not only make more players available in the immediate; it should in theory extend their careers. For a league that prides itself on selling nostalgia in real time, that is no small auxiliary gain from fewer games.

It makes a lot of sense for a lot of reasons and no sense for one reason — the financial gain of a league that sold its latest franchise for $6.1 billion. Which is why it won’t happen. That doesn’t mean it shouldn’t.

Determination: Fact. The NBA season is too long.

How to Take Photos on iOS Without All the Post-Processing Junk

Your iPhone’s camera is smart—perhaps too smart. It’s smart enough to relight your selfies and remove distracting background objects from your photos. It’s the kind of reality-altering power that normally requires an Infinity Stone. It can also make it much harder to get photos that are accurate representations of the real world. Fortunately, there are alternatives.

It’s worth noting that it’s difficult to get absolutely zero processing on any smartphone camera. There’s always some amount of interpretation of raw data in order to display it. What we want to minimize here is how much your phone makes decisions about the “right” way your photos should look—decisions like how saturated colors should be, what parts of the image should be in or out of focus, and how your subject should be lit. Sometimes it’s better to let your phone make these decisions for you, but if you want more control, these are the options that are best for you.

Get more flexibility with Apple ProRAW

Normally, when you take a photo, your phone compresses the image to save space and tosses data that’s not necessary to display it. But that data can be useful if you want to do your own photo editing. That’s where Apple ProRAW comes in. This format (which takes up more storage space) saves almost all of the data from your camera’s sensor when the photo was taken.

This lets you adjust things like exposure, contrast, saturation, white balance, and other basic aspects of an image. There’s still some unavoidable image processing done to these photos, but ProRAW gives you a lot more flexibility to make changes than you normally would have.

To enable ProRAW images, tap the RAW button while you’re using your camera to use it for the current session. If you’d rather permanently switch your default settings, go to Settings > Camera > Preserve Settings and enable ProRAW & Resolution control. With this enabled, the camera will be in ProRAW mode unless you specifically disable it each time.

Use ZeroCam, the anti-AI camera app

ZeroCam makes the pitch that less is more, especially when it comes to camera features. In fact it only has one: a shutter button. There’s no post-processing, no filters or effects, and the only optional toggle is which of your phone’s lenses to use. It literally can’t be easier—for better or worse.

In my experience, images taken with ZeroCam in low-light settings had noticeably more noise, which is to be expected without a lot of post-processing. However, photos that were properly lit looked a bit more natural than with the stock camera app.

The main downside to the ZeroCam app is the cost: A subscription will run you $2/month, or $13 if you pay for a year up front. You can get a free three-day trial (for the monthly plan, bumped up to a week if you opt for the annual plan), at which point you’ll probably know for sure whether it’s worth the expense to you.

Use Halide for more control over AI-free photos

Unlike ZeroCam, Halide Mark II provides extensive manual controls over your camera. You can precisely adjust focus, ISO, shutter speed, and white balance before capturing the image. Some of these controls are available in the default camera app, but Halide adds other useful tools like focus peaking and live histograms.

Halide also has a dedicated Process Zero mode, which touts zero post-processing AI. This is as close as you can get to photos that are straight from the sensor with only the minimum processing required to create a viewable image. 

Like ZeroCam, this app isn’t free, although you can get a seven-day free trial to see if it serves your needs. After that, monthly subscriptions start at $10, or you can get a year for $20. If you know for certain you love the app and will be using it for a long time, a lifetime license will set you back $60.

Try the Blackmagic Camera app for filterless video

Blackmagic makes the free video editing suite Davinci Resolve, as well as a line of cinema cameras that tie deeply into the software. More recently, the company has released an app for the iPhone that leverages its expertise for the camera you always have with you. The Blackmagic Camera app is primarily focused on video, but you can use it to grab stills from your clips as well.

If you only want still photos, one of the other options on this list is probably better for you, but this app is perfect for videographers. It offers pro-level camera controls like ISO, shutter speed, and white balance, as well as features like an RGB histogram to see which parts of your image are clipping, and image stabilization to reduce the camera shake from holding it in your hand.