Lakers vs. Nuggets Predictions: Odds, recent stats, trends and best bets for March 14

Los Angeles Lakers vs. Denver Nuggets Preview 

The Los Angeles Lakers (40-24) and Denver Nuggets (42-24) are all set to square off from Ball Arena in Denver.

The Lakers had a challenging game last night against the Milwaukee Bucks. They were down big for much of the game and couldn’t generate offense outside of Luca Doncic.

They are 13-point underdogs on the second half of a back-to-back in Mile High.

The Lakers are currently 15-17 on the road with a point differential of 1, while the Nuggets have a 8-2 record in their last ten games at home. 

We’ve got all the info and analysis you need to know ahead of the game, including the latest info on the how to catch tipoff, odds, recent team performance, player stats, and of course, our predictions, picks & best bets for the game from our modeling tools and staff of experts.

Listen to the Rotoworld Basketball Show for the latest fantasy player news, waiver claims, roster advice and more from our experts all season long. Click here or download it wherever you get your podcasts.

Game details & how to watch Lakers vs. Nuggets live today

  • Date: Friday, March 14, 2025
  • Time: 9:30PM EST
  • Site: Ball Arena
  • City: Denver, CO
  • Network/Streaming:

Never miss a second of the action and stay up to date with all the latest team stats and player news. Check out our day-by-day NBA schedule page, along with detailed matchup pages that update live in-game.

Game odds for Lakers vs. Nuggets

The latest odds as of Friday:

  • Odds: Lakers (+562), Nuggets (-813)
  • Spread:  Nuggets -13
  • Over/Under: 233 points

That gives the Lakers an implied team point total of 115.52, and the Nuggets 122.29.
 
Want to know which sportsbook is offering the best lines for every game on the NBA calendar? Check out the NBC Sports’ Live Odds tool to get all the latest updated info from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM & more!

Expert picks & predictions for Friday’s Lakers vs. Nuggets game

NBC Sports Bet Best Bet

Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.

Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the NBA calendar based on data points like recent performance, head-to-head player matchups, trends information and projected game totals.

Once the model is finished running, we put its projections next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.

Here are the best bets our model is projecting for today’s Lakers & Nuggets game:

  • Moneyline: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play on the Denver Nuggets on the Moneyline.
  • Spread: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play ATS on the Los Angeles Lakers at +13.
  • Total: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play on the under on the Game Total of 233.

Want even more NBA best bets and predictions from our expert staff & tools? Check out the Expert NBA Predictions page from NBC Sports for money line, spread and over/under picks for every game on today’s calendar!

Important stats, trends & insights to know ahead of Lakers vs. Nuggets on Friday

  • The Nuggets have won 4 of their last 5 matchups against Western Conference Pacific Division teams
  • 9 of the Nuggets’ last 11 matchups with the Lakers have stayed under the Total
  • The Nuggets have failed to cover the Spread in 4 of their last 5 matchups against Western Conference teams
  • The Nuggets have won 4 of their last 5 matchups against Western Conference Pacific Division teams

 
If you’re looking for more key trends and stats around the spread, moneyline and total for every single game on the schedule today, check out our NBA Top Trends tool on NBC Sports!
 
Bet the Edge is your source for all things sports betting. Get all of Jay Croucher and Drew Dinsick’s insight weekdays at 6AM ET right here or wherever you get your favorite podcasts. 
 
Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff: 

– Jay Croucher (@croucherJD)
– Drew Dinsick (@whale_capper) 
Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports) 
Brad Thomas (@MrBradThomas)

Fact or Fiction: The NBA is ridiculous (in a good way)

Each week during the 2024-25 NBA season, we will take a deeper dive into some of the league’s biggest storylines in an attempt to determine whether trends are based more in fact or fiction moving forward.

[Last time: Is the NBA without a future face?]


How ridiculous is the NBA? Let us count the ways. Over the past week or so …

• Two former players, stretching nearly 14 feet and weighing close to a combined 600 pounds, challenged each other to a fight over the way they believe the game should be covered from a media perspective.

That is what happened when TNT’s Charles Barkley said, “I want all the smoke,” calling ESPN’s Kendrick Perkins a “fool” and an “idiot.” To which Perkins said, “I will address his a** like the numbers on a house.”

[Yahoo Fantasy Bracket Mayhem is back: Enter for a shot to win up to $50K]

And what, pray tell, could possibly be the reason for these two behemoths to be so angry at each other? Barkley believes Perkins dedicates too much time to the Los Angeles Lakers and Golden State Warriors. That is it. That is the entirety of their latest beef, at least so far as I read it. A Hall of Famer is upset because a guy who averaged 5.4 points per game for his career is not talking about the Cleveland Cavaliers enough.

Hollywood drama, anyone? (AP Photo/Kevork Djansezian)
ASSOCIATED PRESS

• One of the greatest players in the history of the league personally and very publicly admonished a media member for daring to talk about his son’s ability to play basketball, even though his son plays basketball professionally. And one of those people is somewhat seriously being discussed as a potential candidate for President of the United States, and it is not LeBron James or his son. It is Stephen A. Smith.

James, who tweeted last season how “hilarious” it was how much better Bronny is than some NBA peers, is essentially big mad that Smith has called him out on it, saying, “I am pleading with LeBron James as a father: Stop this.” “This,” we assume, is the dog-and-pony show of pretending that Bronny James would be in the NBA, earning $8 million from those very Lakers through 2028, if his name were Jonny Brames.

(Actually Jonny Brames is a great name. That dude probably would be in the NBA.)

And of course Smith took every opportunity after the confrontation to call it “weak” and “some bulls***,” as if James cannot possibly take issue with something he said. Bodes well for his presidential campaign.

Has anyone stopped to ask Bronny how he feels about all of this? He is a 20-year-old working professional who, by all indications, is fully capable of speaking for himself in these situations. Having his father, who set him up for all of it, fighting his battles for him makes the nepotism feel more nepotism-y.

• One active player accused another of ducking a third because two of them had a heated practice in 2018, even though the accused was not ducking anyone; he was attending a funeral for a personal friend.

Confounding, right? Draymond Green did actually say on his podcast that New York Knicks center Karl-Anthony Towns would not play his Warriors because Jimmy Butler was on the opposite side. When it turned out that Towns was dealing with the death of someone close to his family, did Green apologize?

No, he did not. He plugged his podcast instead. (Although Towns did address the issue.) What fresh hell are we living in, where Green is serving up his signature dish. You can guess what is on the menu. (Hint: It’s something Stephen A. Smith said earlier.)

• The guys who made the dumbest trade in the history of the NBA are, a month later, still defending the dumbest trade in the history of the NBA as if it were not the dumbest trade in the history of the NBA.

That is right: Dallas Mavericks governor Patrick Dumont is still talking about the Luka Dončić trade.  

This was a decision about the future,” Dumont recently said. “If you look at our roster today and who we have, we feel like we position ourselves to be incredibly competitive against the best teams in the NBA.”

Weird. Your general manager, Nico Harrison, said it was a win-now decision, and you kind of just said it was one, too. And your team is in absolute shambles only weeks from trading the 25-year-old superstar who led you to the NBA Finals last year. There is no future to speak of in Dallas. And no present, either.

I would tell them to stop speaking if it were not so morbidly fun to watch them dig their hole deeper. Even Mark Cuban is out here telling people that he sold the Mavericks because he did not want his kids to make a trade so dumb. That is not the reason he sold the team, but it is hilarious he is saying it is.

• One team was fined $100,000 for violating the NBA’s player participation policy in its efforts to tank the season, while another is more deftly — if not accidentally — driving its campaign into the ground.

The NBA fined the Utah Jazz for “failing to make Lauri Markkanen available” against the Washington Wizards in a battle of the league’s two worst teams on March 5. The Jazz must have figured no one was watching, even the league office.

Meanwhile, have you seen the Philadelphia 76ers’ rotation on their current run of misery? On Wednesday they started Jared Butler, Quentin Grimes, Kelly Oubre Jr., Andre Drummond and Justin Edwards. We will wait as you search “Jared Butler” and “Justin Edwards” to ensure that they are indeed actual NBA players.

It is not Philadelphia’s fault that Joel Embiid, Paul George and Tyrese Maxey are all nursing loosely defined injuries on undisclosed recovery timelines. But if I were a team that needed to win a top-six draft slot in order to not lose its first-round pick, and I owned the NBA’s sixth-worst record, I would ensure that all of my best players were nursing loosely defined injuries on undisclosed recovery timelines.

• Two incredible MVP candidates played two incredible games, each enjoying a sublime performance in a win over the other, and some folks instead wanted to talk about why one of them is “afoulmerchant.”

Why can’t we just have nice things? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Nikola Jokić are very nice things. In my opinion, it is wild that Gilgeous-Alexander is enjoying one of the greatest seasons for a guard in history, and yet Jokić is in a class of his own, because his statistics are (arguably) the greatest we have ever seen.

But the debate cannot end there. We must label one of them with a moniker that gives people who have not yet been introduced to SGA a reason not to like him. Here is a counter: If Gilgeous-Alexander is not actually earning his many trips to the free-throw line, why, then, are coaches not challenging those calls?

This is the way the NBA works. Do not like something? Manufacture reasons why everybody should not like that something, so we can all enjoy it less. Or challenge someone to a fight. It is all the same show.

Determination: Fact. The NBA is ridiculous. Where else can you find this drama but reality television.

Fact or Fiction: The NBA is ridiculous (in a good way)

Each week during the 2024-25 NBA season, we will take a deeper dive into some of the league’s biggest storylines in an attempt to determine whether trends are based more in fact or fiction moving forward.

[Last time: Is the NBA without a future face?]


How ridiculous is the NBA? Let us count the ways. Over the past week or so …

• Two former players, stretching nearly 14 feet and weighing close to a combined 600 pounds, challenged each other to a fight over the way they believe the game should be covered from a media perspective.

That is what happened when TNT’s Charles Barkley said, “I want all the smoke,” calling ESPN’s Kendrick Perkins a “fool” and an “idiot.” To which Perkins said, “I will address his a** like the numbers on a house.”

[Yahoo Fantasy Bracket Mayhem is back: Enter for a shot to win up to $50K]

And what, pray tell, could possibly be the reason for these two behemoths to be so angry at each other? Barkley believes Perkins dedicates too much time to the Los Angeles Lakers and Golden State Warriors. That is it. That is the entirety of their latest beef, at least so far as I read it. A Hall of Famer is upset because a guy who averaged 5.4 points per game for his career is not talking about the Cleveland Cavaliers enough.

Hollywood drama, anyone? (AP Photo/Kevork Djansezian)
ASSOCIATED PRESS

• One of the greatest players in the history of the league personally and very publicly admonished a media member for daring to talk about his son’s ability to play basketball, even though his son plays basketball professionally. And one of those people is somewhat seriously being discussed as a potential candidate for President of the United States, and it is not LeBron James or his son. It is Stephen A. Smith.

James, who tweeted last season how “hilarious” it was how much better Bronny is than some NBA peers, is essentially big mad that Smith has called him out on it, saying, “I am pleading with LeBron James as a father: Stop this.” “This,” we assume, is the dog-and-pony show of pretending that Bronny James would be in the NBA, earning $8 million from those very Lakers through 2028, if his name were Jonny Brames.

(Actually Jonny Brames is a great name. That dude probably would be in the NBA.)

And of course Smith took every opportunity after the confrontation to call it “weak” and “some bulls***,” as if James cannot possibly take issue with something he said. Bodes well for his presidential campaign.

Has anyone stopped to ask Bronny how he feels about all of this? He is a 20-year-old working professional who, by all indications, is fully capable of speaking for himself in these situations. Having his father, who set him up for all of it, fighting his battles for him makes the nepotism feel more nepotism-y.

• One active player accused another of ducking a third because two of them had a heated practice in 2018, even though the accused was not ducking anyone; he was attending a funeral for a personal friend.

Confounding, right? Draymond Green did actually say on his podcast that New York Knicks center Karl-Anthony Towns would not play his Warriors because Jimmy Butler was on the opposite side. When it turned out that Towns was dealing with the death of someone close to his family, did Green apologize?

No, he did not. He plugged his podcast instead. (Although Towns did address the issue.) What fresh hell are we living in, where Green is serving up his signature dish. You can guess what is on the menu. (Hint: It’s something Stephen A. Smith said earlier.)

• The guys who made the dumbest trade in the history of the NBA are, a month later, still defending the dumbest trade in the history of the NBA as if it were not the dumbest trade in the history of the NBA.

That is right: Dallas Mavericks governor Patrick Dumont is still talking about the Luka Dončić trade.  

This was a decision about the future,” Dumont recently said. “If you look at our roster today and who we have, we feel like we position ourselves to be incredibly competitive against the best teams in the NBA.”

Weird. Your general manager, Nico Harrison, said it was a win-now decision, and you kind of just said it was one, too. And your team is in absolute shambles only weeks from trading the 25-year-old superstar who led you to the NBA Finals last year. There is no future to speak of in Dallas. And no present, either.

I would tell them to stop speaking if it were not so morbidly fun to watch them dig their hole deeper. Even Mark Cuban is out here telling people that he sold the Mavericks because he did not want his kids to make a trade so dumb. That is not the reason he sold the team, but it is hilarious he is saying it is.

• One team was fined $100,000 for violating the NBA’s player participation policy in its efforts to tank the season, while another is more deftly — if not accidentally — driving its campaign into the ground.

The NBA fined the Utah Jazz for “failing to make Lauri Markkanen available” against the Washington Wizards in a battle of the league’s two worst teams on March 5. The Jazz must have figured no one was watching, even the league office.

Meanwhile, have you seen the Philadelphia 76ers’ rotation on their current run of misery? On Wednesday they started Jared Butler, Quentin Grimes, Kelly Oubre Jr., Andre Drummond and Justin Edwards. We will wait as you search “Jared Butler” and “Justin Edwards” to ensure that they are indeed actual NBA players.

It is not Philadelphia’s fault that Joel Embiid, Paul George and Tyrese Maxey are all nursing loosely defined injuries on undisclosed recovery timelines. But if I were a team that needed to win a top-six draft slot in order to not lose its first-round pick, and I owned the NBA’s sixth-worst record, I would ensure that all of my best players were nursing loosely defined injuries on undisclosed recovery timelines.

• Two incredible MVP candidates played two incredible games, each enjoying a sublime performance in a win over the other, and some folks instead wanted to talk about why one of them is “afoulmerchant.”

Why can’t we just have nice things? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Nikola Jokić are very nice things. In my opinion, it is wild that Gilgeous-Alexander is enjoying one of the greatest seasons for a guard in history, and yet Jokić is in a class of his own, because his statistics are (arguably) the greatest we have ever seen.

But the debate cannot end there. We must label one of them with a moniker that gives people who have not yet been introduced to SGA a reason not to like him. Here is a counter: If Gilgeous-Alexander is not actually earning his many trips to the free-throw line, why, then, are coaches not challenging those calls?

This is the way the NBA works. Do not like something? Manufacture reasons why everybody should not like that something, so we can all enjoy it less. Or challenge someone to a fight. It is all the same show.

Determination: Fact. The NBA is ridiculous. Where else can you find this drama but reality television.

My Favorite Amazon Deal of the Day: The Apple AirPods 4

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Prior to September 2024, any Apple user interested in active noise-canceling (ANC) AirPods would’ve had to shell out $250 for the AirPods Pro. With the release of the ANC AirPods 4, the tech is much more affordable—and you can currently grab a pair of these $179 earbuds for $148.99. Apple also has a more budget-friendly version of the AirPods 4 without ANC; that model is currently for $99.99, down from $129.

Both of these prices mark record lows, according to price-tracking tools. While the discounts aren’t mind-blowing, the fact we’re seeing any price reductions on newly released AirPods makes them a good deal, relatively speaking—especially outside of the typical Prime Day/Black Friday sales window.

The AirPods 4 have updated USB-C charging. Both models are powered by Apple’s H2 chip, so you’ll get Personalized Spatial Audio (so you can hear sounds seemingly coming from different directions as you move your head) and the ability to use head gestures to tell Siri “yes” or “no” (this also works for answering or denying calls). It’s also likely Apple will add a live translation feature to both models when iOS 19 rolls out later this year.

If you spring for the ANC AirPods 4, you’ll get a charging case with a built-in speaker, which you can use with Find My to locate it if you lose them. You’ll also get features like Conversation Awareness, which lowers your music volume when your AirPods detect that you’re talking to someone; Transparency Mode, which lets you better hear your surroundings while your earbuds are in; and Adaptive Audio (combines ANC and Transparency mode to adjust ANC levels based on the noise around you). Keep in mind that since these are open style earbuds, lacking a silicone tip to better block out noise, the ANC will not be as good as what you can get from AirPods Pro or Beats Fit Pro.

Both versions are rated IP54 for dust and water resistance, offer up to five hours of listening per charge (up to 30 hours with the charging case), and can handle automatic switching with your other Apple devices. You can read more about the non-ANC AirPods in PCMag’s “excellent” review, and more about the ANC AirPods in PCMag’s “outstanding” review.

Dallas governor Patrick Dumont on Doncic trade: ‘This was a decision about the future’

What’s the first rule of climbing out of a deep hole? Stop digging.

Dallas Mavericks ownership and front office are in a hole with their fan base after trading away Luka Doncic and assembling a team that went from the NBA Finals a season ago to likely missing the playoffs entirely this year (to be fair, injuries are a part of that). The Mavericks need to stop digging, yet here is what team governor Patrick Dumont said during a speaking engagement put on by a Dallas-area real estate organization this week:

“This was a decision about the future. If you look at our roster today and who we have, we feel like we’ve positioned ourselves to be incredibly competitive against the best teams in the NBA. And if you’re a fan of basketball — I’ll just throw that out there — you have Kyrie Irving, Klay Thompson, P.J. Washington, Anthony Davis and either Daniel Gafford or Dereck Lively as your starting five. That’s going to put fear into a lot of teams in the league, if we can get going…

“The objective was, ‘How do we create a roster for the future that allows us to be the most competitive team?’…

“It’s really just about improving the team for the future.”

You can feel the collective eye rolls from Mavericks fans. Tell us again how trading away a 25-year-old top-five player in the world (when healthy) for a 32-year-old great player but with an injury history is a good decision about the future. Stop digging.

Klay Thompson, for his part, is buying into the message.

Former Mavs owner Mark Cuban this week echoed what sources from every corner of the league have been saying since the trade: Even if somehow you talk yourself into the need to trade Doncic, “Just get a better deal.” As great as Anthony Davis can be, as much as Max Christie is thriving, getting just one first-round pick in this trade is mind-boggling, let alone there should have been more win-now talent. The Knicks gave up five first-round picks to get Mikal Bridges last offseason. Cuban rightfully said that if Dallas had gotten four first-round picks with Davis and Christie, the conversation would be different (fans would have still questioned the wisdom of making the trade, but at least that’s close to a fair return). It should be noted the Lakers only had two firsts to trade, so a third and maybe fourth team would have had to come in with much bigger roles than Utah had in the existing deal.

The fastest way out of the hole for the Mavericks is to start winning games (and not jack up ticket prices). However, with the unfortunate ACL injury to Kyrie Irving that will sideline him until at least the middle of next season, it will be a while before the level of winning fans saw with Doncic returns. Until then, stop digging.

Magic vs. Timberwolves Predictions: Odds, recent stats, trends, best bets for March 14

Orlando Magic vs. Minnesota Timberwolves Preview 

The Orlando Magic (31-36) and Minnesota Timberwolves (38-29) are all set to square off from Target Center in Minneapolis.

The Orlando Magic are a game and a half behind the Atlanta Hawks for the Southeast Division. They have been in a bit of a slide losing seven of their last 10.

The Timberwolves are third in the Northwest, but are on a six game winning streak.

The Magic are currently 13-20 on the road with a point differential of -1, while the Timberwolves have a 6-4 record in their last ten games at home. 

We’ve got all the info and analysis you need to know ahead of the game, including the latest info on the how to catch tipoff, odds, recent team performance, player stats, and of course, our predictions, picks & best bets for the game from our modeling tools and staff of experts.

Listen to the Rotoworld Basketball Show for the latest fantasy player news, waiver claims, roster advice and more from our experts all season long. Click here or download it wherever you get your podcasts.

Game details & how to watch Magic vs. Timberwolves live today

  • Date: Friday, March 14, 2025
  • Time: 8:00PM EST
  • Site: Target Center
  • City: Minneapolis, MN
  • Network/Streaming:

Never miss a second of the action and stay up to date with all the latest team stats and player news. Check out our day-by-day NBA schedule page, along with detailed matchup pages that update live in-game.

Game odds for Magic vs. Timberwolves

The latest odds as of Friday:

  • Odds: Magic (+366), Timberwolves (-481)
  • Spread:  Timberwolves -10.5
  • Over/Under: 208 points

That gives the Magic an implied team point total of 102.87, and the Timberwolves 108.35.
 
Want to know which sportsbook is offering the best lines for every game on the NBA calendar? Check out the NBC Sports’ Live Odds tool to get all the latest updated info from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM & more!

Expert picks & predictions for Friday’s Magic vs. Timberwolves game

NBC Sports Bet Best Bet

Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.

Brad Thomas (@MrBradThomas) is leaning towards the Timberwolves -10.5…

Thomas: “The Magic are coming off a big win last night against the Pelicans. However, back-to-back road games feel a bit tough for a struggling team. They played in Orlando in January, and the Timberwolves won and covered. The Timberwolves have also covered in five of their last six.”

Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the NBA calendar based on data points like recent performance, head-to-head player matchups, trends information and projected game totals.

Once the model is finished running, we put its projections next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.

Here are the best bets our model is projecting for today’s Magic & Timberwolves game:

  • Moneyline: NBC Sports Bet is recommending a play on the Minnesota Timberwolves on the Moneyline.
  • Spread: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play ATS on the Orlando Magic at +10.
  • Total: NBC Sports Bet is staying away from a play on the Game Total of 208.

Want even more NBA best bets and predictions from our expert staff & tools? Check out the Expert NBA Predictions page from NBC Sports for money line, spread and over/under picks for every game on today’s calendar!
 
Bet the Edge is your source for all things sports betting. Get all of Jay Croucher and Drew Dinsick’s insight weekdays at 6AM ET right here or wherever you get your favorite podcasts. 
 
Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff: 
– Jay Croucher (@croucherJD)
– Drew Dinsick (@whale_capper) 
Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports) 
Brad Thomas (@MrBradThomas)

The Running Gear You Should Splurge On (and When You Can Go Cheap)

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

I’m Lifehacker’s resident marathon runner and senior finance writer. And now, I’m merging my two worlds. Last month I wrote about what it looks like to invest in proper running gear. But while I was breaking down how much running gear can cost, I didn’t dive into how much gear should cost. Which expensive gear is actually worth it, even for the casual runner?

Quality running shoes

Nothing affects your running experience more than your shoes. Premium models from brands like Brooks, Hoka, Nike, and Saucony aren’t just marketing hype—they offer technology that can prevent injury and improve performance, with:

  • Better cushioning systems that absorb impact

  • Stability or motion control

  • Durability that extends their lifespan (300-500 miles vs. 150-200 for budget options)

A proper fitting at a specialty running store is invaluable. Your ideal shoe depends on your gait, foot shape, and running goals—making this personalized service worth the premium you’ll pay over big-box stores. Lifehacker’s senior health editor Beth Skwarecki has a fantastic guide to get you started on how to find the perfect pair.

If you only splurge on one thing in the running world, it’s got to be shoes. My preferred pair at the moment? The Brooks Ghost 16. It’s a reliable “daily trainer” that gets the job done on quick sprints and slow long runs alike.

Socks

When it comes to socks, keep in mind not just quality, but quantity. Runners require a disgusting amount of laundry.

At the same time, your baseline for “quality” running socks should be a bit more discerning compared to your daily walking-around socks. If you want to spring for features like odor control and moisture management, be my guest—but I haven’t found a world of difference for that higher price. This six-pack from Nike for $30 is par for the course, and I wouldn’t spend much more than that.

If you find a mid-range pack of heel-tab socks that don’t give you blisters, stick with them, and ignore overly hyped running socks that you might find in a running-specific store.

High-performance sports bras

For women, a quality sports bra isn’t optional—it’s essential. “When you’re shopping options from sport-specific brands like Nike and Adidas, look for these sorts of features

  • Enhanced support that keeps everything in place

  • Moisture-wicking materials that prevent chafing

  • Adjustable features for customized support

  • Durability through hundreds of wash cycles

The difference between a $20 and $40-60 sports bra becomes apparent after mile three of a long run, when inferior options lead to certain discomfort—to put it mildly—that can sideline you.

Anti-chafing products

Cheap versions of anti-chafing sticks could mean skin irritation, greasiness, or simply a waste of time. Luckily, “cheap” in this instance means the difference between the Vaseline already in your house and buying a $10 stick.

This Body Glide anti-chafing stick works like a charm for just $8.99. Just one palm-sized stick has lasted longer than a full training cycle of long runs.

Basic shorts and shirts

While technical shirts and shorts can run you well over $50, in my experience, they only offer marginally better moisture-wicking and comfort. Budget options closer to $15-25 perform nearly as well for most runners.

Plus, if you get into the world of organized racing, you’ll have swag in the form of hats, shorts, and shirts for life.

Fitness trackers and GPS watches

While serious runners benefit from advanced metrics in $300+ GPS watches, casual runners can use free smartphone apps (Strava, MapMyRun, Nike Run Club).

If you ask me, extra features like running power, VO2 max estimates, and recovery advisors rarely justify the cost for recreational runners. While I tend to go watch-less on my runs, Beth has a great guide to finding a running watch here. One budget pick she recommends is the no-nonsense Forerunner 55 for $149.99.

Running belts

The two big names in running belts are the minimalist SPIbelt and the maximalist FlipBelt. The SPIbelt (“small personal item belt”) is perfect for the low-key runner who only needs to hold their phone or their keys.

While I wouldn’t call myself a maximalist runner—quite the opposite—I prefer FlipBelts for a much simpler reason. Compared to the SPIbelt, with my Flip, everything stays in place while you run. I tuck my energy gels, keys, phone, even some tissues in my FlipBelt, and it all stays snug on my person during my run—no bouncing up and down while you go.

Compression gear

Despite marketing claims, research shows mixed results on whether compression socks, sleeves, and tights ($30-80) improve performance or recovery for most runners. And hey, even if their muscle soreness superpowers are overhyped, they’re comfortable and feel good in the moment. Save your money unless you have specific circulation issues or find them exceptionally comfortable.

Designer sunglasses

I don’t wear sunglasses on my runs, and in my experience in races, the sunglasses I see are few and far between. While eye protection is a priority for some, $200 running sunglasses don’t offer significant advantages over $20-40 sport sunglasses from Target or Amazon. Unless you need them for medical reasons, you won’t find me recommending spending money on designer sunglasses.

Technical outerwear

For year-round runners, I recommend one high-quality waterproof/windproof jacket as a worthwhile investment. If you try to tough out the cold and rain with a cotton sweatshirt, you’ll find yourself soggy and suffocated pretty quick.

Still, you only need one good piece for the rain and extreme cold, not a collection. You can layer those budget options you already own, rather than waste money on a fancy technical wardrobe.

Nutrition products

I’ve written before about what to eat before and during your long runs, which plays a critical role in how you recover. My preference in gels is aptly named “Gu.” A 24-pack of Gu runs me about $38.49. Other runners swear by Gatorade chews, Snickers bars, or even some loose dates in a Ziploc bag.

Investing in nutrition like gels, chews, and electrolyte drinks matters most during long runs (10+ miles). For shorter distances, cheaper alternatives or homemade options work fine.

The bottom line

The key to smart running investments is to prioritize gear that directly impacts injury prevention (shoes, socks, sports bras) and comfort (anti-chafing products). For everything else, ask yourself: “Will this significantly improve my running experience, or just my appearance?”

Remember that consistency trumps gear every time. An inexpensive but regular running habit will always outperform an occasional run in top-dollar equipment. The best investment isn’t always what costs the most—it’s what gets you out the door day after day.