Yankees’ Giancarlo Stanton expected to play for Double-A on Saturday, could join team in Boston for series finale

As the Yankees get set for a three-game series against their rival, the Boston Red Sox, at Fenway Park over the weekend, Giancarlo Stanton remains in Double-A on a rehab assignment.

While Stanton is not in Friday’s lineup for the Somerset Patriots for the first time during his rehab after playing three straight days earlier this week, he is expected to play on Saturday, per manager Aaron Boone.

Following Saturday’s game, New York is not ruling out the possibility of Stanton joining the team in Boston for the series finale. However, that scenario may be unlikely with Sunday being a day game.

“I’m not necessarily expecting him this weekend, but stranger things have happened,” Boone told the media before Friday’s game.

In three games for Double-A, Stanton is hitting .273 (3-for-11) with four RBI.

Jacob Misiorowski’s dazzling debut, Brewers-White Sox trade & five players to worry about | Baseball Bar-B-Cast

The Milwaukee Brewers may have found their next “guy.” Jacob Misiorowski put the league on notice, Thursday night, in an electric debut for the Brewers, striking out five Cardinals and allowing no hits in 5 innings. A slim Chris Sale is how Jake described him. Yahoo Sports’ MLB Insider, Russell Dorsey, guest hosts, pinch hitting for Jordan Shusterman today. He and Jake break down Misiorowski’s debut and explain why this outing may be a sign of big things to come from the Brewers’ newest pitcher.

One pitcher in takes one pitcher out. Jake and Russell discuss Aaron Civale’s trade demand following Misiorowski’s arrival. Minutes later breaking news hits the pod as Civale is traded to the White Sox for Andrew Vaughn. The guys breakdown this trade and try to figure out how exactly Andrew Vaughn may fit in Milwaukee.

It’s been a rocky start to the season for some players and Russell is especially concerned about a few of them. He breaks down the five players he is most concerned about this season. He and Jake discuss what may happen to Luis Robert Jr., Willy Adames and others this season and beyond.

Finally, it’s everyone’s favorite segment of the week. The latest installment of The Good, The Bad & The Uggla is here as the Pope puts on a White Sox hat, Hunter Dobbins accidentally lies, Jake has an issue with jello shots and more!

Close out your week with us at the Baseball Bar-B-Cast.

Jacob Misiorowski's Debut for Brewers


Photo by Kylie Bridenhagen/MLB Photos via Getty Images
Jacob Misiorowski’s Debut for Brewers

Photo by Kylie Bridenhagen/MLB Photos via Getty Images

Photo by Kylie Bridenhagen/MLB Photos via Getty Images

(1:47) – Jacob Misiorowski

(17:01) – Brewers-White Sox trade

(23:42) – 5 players to be concerned about

(46:36) – The Good, The Bad & The Uggla

Follow the show on X at @CespedesBBQ

Follow Jake @Jake_Mintz

Follow Jordan @J_Shusterman_

🖥️ Watch this full episode on YouTube

Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports podcast family at https://apple.co/3zEuTQj or at Yahoo Sports Podcasts

Jacob Misiorowski’s dazzling debut, Brewers-White Sox trade & five players to worry about | Baseball Bar-B-Cast

The Milwaukee Brewers may have found their next “guy.” Jacob Misiorowski put the league on notice, Thursday night, in an electric debut for the Brewers, striking out five Cardinals and allowing no hits in 5 innings. A slim Chris Sale is how Jake described him. Yahoo Sports’ MLB Insider, Russell Dorsey, guest hosts, pinch hitting for Jordan Shusterman today. He and Jake break down Misiorowski’s debut and explain why this outing may be a sign of big things to come from the Brewers’ newest pitcher.

One pitcher in takes one pitcher out. Jake and Russell discuss Aaron Civale’s trade demand following Misiorowski’s arrival. Minutes later breaking news hits the pod as Civale is traded to the White Sox for Andrew Vaughn. The guys breakdown this trade and try to figure out how exactly Andrew Vaughn may fit in Milwaukee.

It’s been a rocky start to the season for some players and Russell is especially concerned about a few of them. He breaks down the five players he is most concerned about this season. He and Jake discuss what may happen to Luis Robert Jr., Willy Adames and others this season and beyond.

Finally, it’s everyone’s favorite segment of the week. The latest installment of The Good, The Bad & The Uggla is here as the Pope puts on a White Sox hat, Hunter Dobbins accidentally lies, Jake has an issue with jello shots and more!

Close out your week with us at the Baseball Bar-B-Cast.

Jacob Misiorowski's Debut for Brewers


Photo by Kylie Bridenhagen/MLB Photos via Getty Images
Jacob Misiorowski’s Debut for Brewers

Photo by Kylie Bridenhagen/MLB Photos via Getty Images

Photo by Kylie Bridenhagen/MLB Photos via Getty Images

(1:47) – Jacob Misiorowski

(17:01) – Brewers-White Sox trade

(23:42) – 5 players to be concerned about

(46:36) – The Good, The Bad & The Uggla

Follow the show on X at @CespedesBBQ

Follow Jake @Jake_Mintz

Follow Jordan @J_Shusterman_

🖥️ Watch this full episode on YouTube

Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports podcast family at https://apple.co/3zEuTQj or at Yahoo Sports Podcasts

David Stearns: Mets would consider calling up top pitching prospects, but there’s a ‘steep hill to climb’

The Mets’ rotation suffered a big blow on Thursday, as Kodai Senga landed on the IL with a hamstring strain. 

Lucky for them, there are plenty of reinforcements on the way, as Paul Blackburn is set to rejoin the rotation on Tuesday while Frankie Montas and Sean Manaea are progressing well during their rehab assignments. 

New York also has some intriguing options stashed down in the minor leagues. 

Nolan McLean continues to dominate during his first full season as a pitcher, Brandon Sproat is finding his footing after a rough start to the year, and Jonah Tong has been cruising his way through Double-A.  

Blade Tidwell, who made his big-league debut earlier this season against the Cardinals, is also still down in Syracuse and possesses significant upside of his own. 

Though all of the young arms are starting to knock on the door, they seem to be a bit of an afterthought for the organization at the moment, with the amount of depth above them on the big-league roster.  

President of baseball operations David Stearns indicated that they would be considered for a call-up if they continue to dominate — but they are facing a bit of an uphill battle.

“We’re going to make those decisions based exclusively on who and what group of players gives us the best chance to win,” Stearns said. “If we have a prospect that we believe gives us the best chance over someone else, we are going to strongly consider that.

“That being said, the volume of established major league pitchers we have makes that a steep hill to climb. We have pitchers at the majors we really believe in, who have proven to pitch at a high level. For a prospect to jump that, especially in a pennant race, is a high bar.”

McLean seems to be the closest to taking that leap with his stretch of dominance.

Sproat is working his way back into the mix after a rough start to the season. He’s put together four straight starts with three or less earned runs to bring his ERA down to 5.31 for the year. Still not where it needs to be, but a step in the right direction. 

“He’s getting back to doing some of the things he did well while in Double-A,” Stearns said of Sproat. “He’s attacking hitters and he’s using the entirety of his arsenal pretty well. We saw the curveball come out a little bit more last night, which is important.

“At the appropriate time, he’s leaning on the changeup when that is the needed pitch. He’s not just trying to blow the fastball by guys. This is a talented guy with weapons, and sometimes you just need to learn again and again that you need to lean on your whole arsenal.”

Why I Would Choose a Steam Deck Over a Nintendo Switch 2

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

After spending about a week with the Nintendo Switch 2, I have to admit that it’s a good console. It’s priced fairly for its sleek form factor and the performance it offers, and it sets Nintendo up to stay relevant while gaming graphics only continue to get more complex. And yet, for my own personal tastes, it’s still not my handheld of choice. Instead, I’ll be sticking to Valve’s Steam Deck, the first and still overall best handheld gaming PC, at least going by value for money. And if you don’t necessarily care about Nintendo’s exclusive games, there’s a good chance it might be the better option for you, too.

The Steam Deck is cheaper than the Switch 2

Out of the gate, the most obvious reason to get a Steam Deck over a Nintendo Switch 2 is price. Starting at $400 for a new model, it’s only modestly cheaper than the Switch 2’s $450, but that’s only part of the story. Valve also runs a certified refurbished program that offers used Decks with only cosmetic blemishes for as low as $279. Restocks are infrequent, since Valve is only able to sell as much as gets sent back to it, but when they do happen, it’s a heck of a great deal.

That said, there is one catch. The Steam Deck OLED, which offers a bigger, more colorful screen and a larger battery, is more expensive than the Switch 2, starting at $549. However, it’s maybe a bit unfair to compare the two, since the Switch 2 does not use an OLED screen and comes with less storage. If all you care about is the basics (I’m perfectly happy with my LCD model), the base Steam Deck is good enough—it’s got the same performance as the more recent one. And that performance, by the way, ended up being about on par with the Switch 2 in my testing, at least in Cyberpunk 2077 (one of my go-to benchmark games).

The Steam Deck is more comfortable to hold than the Switch 2

This one is a bit of a toss-up, depending on your preferences, although I think the Steam Deck takes a slight lead here. While the Nintendo Switch 2 aims for a completely flat and somewhat compact profile, the Steam Deck instead allows itself to stretch out, and even though it’s a little bigger and a little heavier for it, I ultimately think that makes it more comfortable.

At 11.73 x 4.60 x 1.93 inches against the Switch 2’s 10.7 x 4.5 x 0.55 inches, and at 1.41 pounds against the Switch 2’s 1.18 pounds, I won’t deny that this will be a non-starter for some. But personally, I still feel like the Steam Deck comes out on top, and that’s thanks to its ergonomics.

I’ve never been a big fan of Nintendo’s joy-con controllers, and while the Switch 2’s joy-con 2 controllers improve on the Switch 1’s with bigger buttons and sticks, as well as more room to hold onto them, they still pale in comparison next to the Steam Deck’s controls.

Steam Deck in profile (above) vs. Switch 2 in profile (below)
Credit: Michelle Ehrhardt

On the Switch 2, there are no grips to wrap your fingers around. On the Steam Deck, there are. The triggers also flare out more, and because the console is wider, your hands can stretch out a bit, rather than choking up on the device. It can get a bit heavy to hold a Steam Deck after a while, but I still prefer this approach overall, and if you have a surface to rest the Steam Deck against (like an airplane tray table), weight is a non-issue.

Plus, there are some extra bonuses that come with the additional space. The Steam Deck has large touchpads on either side of the device, plus four grip buttons on the back of it, giving you some extra inputs to play around with. Nice.

It’s a bit less portable and a bit heavier, but for my adult hands, the Steam Deck is just better shaped to them.

The Steam Deck has a bigger, cheaper library than the Switch 2

This is the kicker. While there are cheap games that can run on the Switch 2 courtesy of backwards compatibility and third-party eShop titles, the big system draws (Nintendo-developed titles like Mario Kart World, for example) can get as pricey as $80. Not to say the Steam Deck doesn’t have expensive games as well, but on the whole, I think it’s easier to get cheap and free games on the Steam Deck than on the eShop.

That’s because, being a handheld gaming PC, the Steam Deck can take advantage of the many sales and freebies PC gaming stores love to give out. These happen a bit more frequently on PC than on console, and that’s because there’s more competition on PC. Someone on PC could download games either from Steam or Epic, for instance, while someone on the Switch 2 can only download games from the Nintendo eShop.

So, even sticking to just Steam, you’ll get access to regular weekend and mid-week sales, quarterly event sales, and developer or publisher highlight sales. That’s more sales events than you’ll usually find on the Nintendo eShop, and if you’re looking for cheaper first-party games, forget about it. Nintendo’s own games hardly ever go on sale, even years after release.

But that’s just the beginning. Despite being named the Steam Deck, the device can actually run games from other stores, too. That’s thanks to an easily installed Linux program called Heroic Launcher, which is free and lets you download and play games from your Epic, GOG, and Amazon Prime Games accounts with just a few clicks.


Credit: Heroic Games Launcher

This is a game changer. Epic and Amazon Prime are both underdogs in the PC gaming space, and so to bolster their numbers, they both regularly give away free games. Epic in particular offers one free PC game every week, whereas if you’re a Twitch user, you might notice a decent but more infrequent amount of notifications allowing you to claim free Amazon Prime games. Some of these are big titles, too—it’s how I got Batman: Arkham Knight and Star Wars Battlefront II. With a simple install and a few months of waiting, you could have a Steam Deck filled to the brim with games that you didn’t even pay for. You just can’t do that on Nintendo.

And then there’s the elephant in the room: your backlog. If you’re anything like me, you probably already have a Steam library that’s hundreds of games large. It was maybe even like this before the Switch 1 came out—regular sales have a tendency to build up the amount of games you own. By choosing the Steam Deck as your handheld, you’ll be able to play those games on the go, instantly giving you what might as well be a full library with no added cost to you. If you migrate over to the Nintendo Switch 2, you’re going to have to start with a fresh library, or at least a library that’s only as old as the Nintendo Switch 1.

Basically, while the Switch 2’s hardware is only $50 more expensive than the Steam Deck, it’ll be easier to fill your Steam Deck up with high quality, inexpensive games than it would be on the Switch 2. If you don’t care about having access to Nintendo exclusive games, that’s a huge draw.

TV Play is a mixed bag

Finally, I want to acknowledge that the Steam Deck still isn’t necessarily a better option than the Switch 2 for everyone. That’s why I’m writing from a personal perspective here. Like all gaming PCs, it’ll take some fiddling to get some games to run, so the Switch 2 is definitely a smoother experience out of the box. It’s also got less battery life, from my testing. But the big point of departure is TV play.

Playing your portable games on a TV on the Switch 2 is as simple as plugging it into its dock. With the Steam Deck, you have to buy a dock separately (the official one is $79), and even then, you have to connect your own controller to it and manually find suitable TV graphics settings for each game on its own. It’s not nearly as easy or flexible.

And yet, for folks like me, I’m willing to say that even TV play is better. Or, depending on what type of PC gamer you are, monitor play.

That’s because you’re not limited to playing your Steam Deck games on the Deck itself, dock or not. Instead, you can play on the Deck when you’re away from your home, and then swap over to your regular gaming PC when you’re back. Your Deck will upload your saves to the cloud automatically, and your PC will seamlessly download them. While not as intuitive as plugging your Switch 2 into its dock, the benefit here is that your non-portable play isn’t limited by the power of your portable device, whereas docked Switch 2 play is still held back by running on portable hardware.

The tradeoff is that maintaining a dedicated gaming PC in addition to a Steam Deck is more expensive, but maybe more importantly, requires more tinkering (there are ways to build a cheap gaming PC, after all). And I think that’s the key point here. If you want a simple-to-use, pick-up-and-play handheld, the Switch 2 is a great choice for you. But if you’re like me, and you’re not afraid to download some launchers and occasionally dive into compatibility settings or swap between two devices, the Steam Deck might still be the best handheld gaming device for you, even three years later.

Mets injury updates: The latest on Jesse Winker, Jose Siri, and Brooks Raley

While the Mets are expecting the luxury of reinforcements to their starting rotation in the near future, it appears they’ll need to wait even longer for a pair of injured outfielders to return to uniform.

During his latest homestand press conference, Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns revealed Friday that bench players Jesse Winker and Jose Siri are currently on different ends of the recovery spectrum. And the positive update was given to Winker, not Siri.

In regard to Winker, who landed on the injured list in early May with a right oblique strain, Stearns said he’s progressing in ramp-up activities but still “multiple weeks” away from beginning a rehab assignment. The timetable checks out, considering that Winker was initially projected to miss 6-8 weeks. Only time will tell how long his eventual rehab stint lasts.

As for Siri, the news was far less encouraging. Stearns said he recently suffered “a little bit of a setback” in his recovery from a fractured left tibia, as imaging showed the bone hadn’t healed to the Mets’ liking. He’s now shut down from all baseball activities. Siri fouled a ball off his shin on April 12, and had yet to return to the field for any drills or workouts. His intial recovery window was 8-12 weeks.

Meanwhile, on the bullpen front, reliever Brooks Raley is close to taking another step forward in his long journey back to the mound. Stearns said the veteran lefty could start a rehab assignment as early as next week, with a full ramp-up period that could last 30 days. The Mets signed Raley in late April, nearly a year after he underwent Tommy John surgery.

Mets will turn to Paul Blackburn for Wednesday’s start against Braves in place of Kodai Senga

Mets manager Carlos Mendoza confirmed before Friday’s game against the Tampa Bay Rays that Paul Blackburn will get the start on Wednesday against the Atlanta Braves in place of the injured Kodai Senga.

Blackburn is still available out of the bullpen in the series opener.

We’re gonna take it day-by-day, turn-by-turn, but Blackburn will take that spot on Wednesday against the Braves,” Mendoza said. “He’s available today out of the bullpen. See where we’re at after the game today, but as of right now, the plan is for him to start on Wednesday.”

If Blackburn doesn’t pitch on Friday, he could still be available out of the bullpen on Saturday, although in a shorter capacity.

“We’ll see what happens today,” Mendoza said. “If we don’t pitch him today, he could be available on a short [outing on Saturday], it wouldn’t be anything – because then he’ll have three days before he has to make a start.”

Blackburn made his season debut against the Los Angeles Dodgers on June 2 after going nearly a full year without pitching in the majors due to multiple injuries. After going five scoreless innings in that outing, he was sent to the bullpen and pitched four innings in relief on June 8 against the Colorado Rockies, giving up three earned runs on seven hits at Coors Field.

With the loss of Senga, Blackburn will once again be an important piece for New York.

“It definitely helps,” the skipper said. “Important to have guys like that and we’ve been talking about our depth, and here we are again getting tested. There’s a reason why we built him up as a starter…

“We see it every time, injuries are a part of this game. Every team will go through it, but I feel like we’re equipped to handle [it]. And obviously we got a guy like that already on the active roster and we got some more guys that are getting close to joining the team.”

Of course, Frankie Montas, who is making another rehab start on Friday, and Sean Manaea, who pitches on Saturday, are also waiting in the wings.

Watch Out for Malicious Unsubscribe Links

In addition to the flood of spam texts you receive on a daily basis, your email inbox is likely filled with newsletters, promotions, and other messages that you don’t care to read and perhaps don’t know why you receive. But you shouldn’t just start clicking unsubscribe links, which may open you up to certain cybersecurity risks.

While email unsubscribe links may seem innocuous, especially if you generally trust the sender, security experts say there are a number of ways in which threat actors can leverage these links for malicious purposes. Like responding to a spam text or answering a spam call, clicking “unsubscribe” confirms that your email address is active, giving cyber criminals an incentive to keep targeting you.

In some cases, unsubscribe links can be hijacked to send users to phishing websites, where you are asked to enter your login credentials to complete the process. According to the folks at DNSFilter, one in every 644 clicks of email unsubscribe links can land you on a malicious website. While you do have to confirm your email address in some legitimate cases, you shouldn’t enter a password, which is likely a scam.

Bottom line: If you don’t trust the sender, you certainly shouldn’t trust any links contained within the email.

How to safely unsubscribe from emails

Even if unsubscribe links are safe, it’s a pain to go through the multi-step process of clicking through individual emails and opening new browser windows to confirm. To minimize hassle and avoid the risk of malicious links in individual emails, you can use unsubscribe features built into your email client, which are less likely to be compromised by threat actors because they aren’t tied to the email itself.

In Gmail, tap More > Manage subscriptions in your left-hand navigation bar (Menu > Manage subscriptions on mobile) and scroll to the sender. Click Unsubscribe to the right of the number of emails sent recently. You can also unsubscribe from individual emails by opening the message and clicking Unsubscribe next to the sender’s name. In some cases, you may be directed to the sender’s website to complete the process. (Note that Gmail may not consider all email campaigns eligible for one-click unsubscribe.) You can also mark the message as spam or block the sender.

In Outlook, go to Settings > Mail > Subscriptions > Your current subscriptions and select Unsubscribe, then tap OK. Alternatively, you can block the sender by clicking the three dots and selecting Block > OK.

Alternatively, you can filter unwanted emails to a different folder (including spam), so while you’ll still receive them, they won’t clog up your main inbox. In Gmail, open the message then click More > Filter messages like these to set up filter criteria, whether that’s sending to another folder, deleting it, or marking it as spam. You can create similar rules in Outlook by right-clicking the message in your message list and going to Rules > Create rule.

A final option is to use a disposable email alias to subscribe to newsletters and promotional emails or when signing up for accounts, which makes it easy to filter messages or delete the address entirely without affecting your main inbox.

Kevin Durant isn’t the player he once was, and that makes any potential deal tricky

Unless you’ve been living under a rock — in which case, why would you ever willingly do that? — the fate of Kevin Durant in Phoenix has been more or less settled for months now.

While no destination has been finalized, Durant and the Suns agreed to initiate divorce proceedings by working together on finding a trade.

ESPN reported things are picking up steam, and several teams appear interested in acquiring the services of Durant, including the Heat, Knicks, Rockets, Spurs and Timberwolves, with Miami, Houston and Minnesota reportedly preparing final offers as a deal could be imminent.

Some make more sense than others, and some only make sense if they are to get Durant on the cheap, and aren’t relinquishing a major chunk of their future.

This is where you might be wondering: Why wouldn’t teams fork over an avalanche of assets for Kevin Freaking Durant?!?!

And it’s a fair question. After all, Durant is unquestionably one of the greatest players of all time and possibly the best plug-and-play superstar in the history of basketball. But alas, nothing is that simple. Let’s break down some factors that add a layer of complexity to any KD deal. 

Kevin Durant is still good, but he is no longer a basketball titan. (Photo by Chris Coduto/Getty Images)
Chris Coduto via Getty Images

Accolades aside, Durant is about to turn 37 years old. While he remains almost unrealistically elite at that age, no one has any idea when a steep decline will occur. Durant is already slowing down, albeit slowly and gracefully, and his reliance on the long 2 — while still a genuine weapon, especially for him — isn’t as big of an asset as it once was.

While Durant hates criticism that centers around his pedestrian 3-point volume, it’s valid in today’s NBA to wonder why a player, who has continuously demonstrated that he can scale up as a shooter, just refuse to do it. As he ages further, you’d think Durant would lean into long-range shooting more, especially as a means to avoid injuries and prolong his success and career. After all, this is a player who is shooting 41.5% from 3 since 2020-21 — but on just five attempts per game

Yet, Durant plays like he always has. The midrange pull-up is a favorite, and he remains effective at getting to the line, where he’s still rock solid.

On the one hand, you can appreciate the consistency and the determination to keep doing what turned him into an all-time great. On the other, you wonder why he hasn’t adjusted more to today’s game and made life easier on himself, while also raising his ceiling for explosive performances.

For interested teams, you assume they want Durant based on his résumé and aren’t looking to reinvent him. Yet, every single one of those teams must also have had the conversation about his advanced age and discussed what their walk-away price is.

For a team like the Spurs, their walk-away price should be far lower than that of the Knicks, given that their long-term future, which is built around Victor Wembanyama, shouldn’t be sacrificed off a competitive two-year window.

For the Knicks, there is no such thing as a long-term future. They’re competing for a title now, and if they believe Durant helps them get there, they should be just fine giving up future assets to make that happen.

So it’s understandable why the Spurs are reportedly no longer in the running, but less so for the Knicks. 

It also raises an overarching question, however, in terms of KD’s dynamic trade value, which differs from team to team: When does a player’s age begin to mean too much?

Let’s set aside the previous concerns about Durant’s game and instead focus on more concerning details.

He tore his Achilles in the 2019 NBA Finals and made a remarkable recovery, despite being 30 at the time. But ever since, he’s had just one season of playing 65-plus games, meaning availability is an issue.

Logic dictates that as a player gets older, his body is more inclined to break down, and that’s regardless of how well anyone takes care of himself — LeBron James excluded, as we’re getting awfully close to deeming him an actual alien. (Although, nagging injuries do appear to be finally creeping in for LeBron.)

As such, teams should consider, in their trade analysis, the possibility of Durant likely missing time and not being available to the same extent as before. Does that remove a first-round pick from the equation? Does it remove several?

That’s obviously up to each team to answer. But it should be a conversation — and an important one.

Overall, let’s make something perfectly clear. Durant is an enormous offensive weapon, even if he’s not as trigger-happy as he should be from the outside. He’ll be an asset anywhere he goes. But the cost of Durant shouldn’t be “whatever’s necessary” if you’re trying to position yourself for the future, and that future is a few years away.

For that matter, even teams that are closer to the Finals shouldn’t relinquish the farm just for the hell of it. As we saw this year in Phoenix, the mere presence of Durant no longer provides you with an automatic playoff berth as it used to.

The team that manages to get Durant into the fold, but maintains significant roster flexibility, is the team that gets it. But seeing as we’re likely in the middle of a bidding war, we could be looking at the acquiring team’s surrendered package and wondering if it was too much.

Kevin Durant isn’t the player he once was, and that makes any potential deal tricky

Unless you’ve been living under a rock — in which case, why would you ever willingly do that? — the fate of Kevin Durant in Phoenix has been more or less settled for months now.

While no destination has been finalized, Durant and the Suns agreed to initiate divorce proceedings by working together on finding a trade.

ESPN reported things are picking up steam, and several teams appear interested in acquiring the services of Durant, including the Heat, Knicks, Rockets, Spurs and Timberwolves, with Miami, Houston and Minnesota reportedly preparing final offers as a deal could be imminent.

Some make more sense than others, and some only make sense if they are to get Durant on the cheap, and aren’t relinquishing a major chunk of their future.

This is where you might be wondering: Why wouldn’t teams fork over an avalanche of assets for Kevin Freaking Durant?!?!

And it’s a fair question. After all, Durant is unquestionably one of the greatest players of all time and possibly the best plug-and-play superstar in the history of basketball. But alas, nothing is that simple. Let’s break down some factors that add a layer of complexity to any KD deal. 

Kevin Durant is still good, but he is no longer a basketball titan. (Photo by Chris Coduto/Getty Images)
Chris Coduto via Getty Images

Accolades aside, Durant is about to turn 37 years old. While he remains almost unrealistically elite at that age, no one has any idea when a steep decline will occur. Durant is already slowing down, albeit slowly and gracefully, and his reliance on the long 2 — while still a genuine weapon, especially for him — isn’t as big of an asset as it once was.

While Durant hates criticism that centers around his pedestrian 3-point volume, it’s valid in today’s NBA to wonder why a player, who has continuously demonstrated that he can scale up as a shooter, just refuse to do it. As he ages further, you’d think Durant would lean into long-range shooting more, especially as a means to avoid injuries and prolong his success and career. After all, this is a player who is shooting 41.5% from 3 since 2020-21 — but on just five attempts per game

Yet, Durant plays like he always has. The midrange pull-up is a favorite, and he remains effective at getting to the line, where he’s still rock solid.

On the one hand, you can appreciate the consistency and the determination to keep doing what turned him into an all-time great. On the other, you wonder why he hasn’t adjusted more to today’s game and made life easier on himself, while also raising his ceiling for explosive performances.

For interested teams, you assume they want Durant based on his résumé and aren’t looking to reinvent him. Yet, every single one of those teams must also have had the conversation about his advanced age and discussed what their walk-away price is.

For a team like the Spurs, their walk-away price should be far lower than that of the Knicks, given that their long-term future, which is built around Victor Wembanyama, shouldn’t be sacrificed off a competitive two-year window.

For the Knicks, there is no such thing as a long-term future. They’re competing for a title now, and if they believe Durant helps them get there, they should be just fine giving up future assets to make that happen.

So it’s understandable why the Spurs are reportedly no longer in the running, but less so for the Knicks. 

It also raises an overarching question, however, in terms of KD’s dynamic trade value, which differs from team to team: When does a player’s age begin to mean too much?

Let’s set aside the previous concerns about Durant’s game and instead focus on more concerning details.

He tore his Achilles in the 2019 NBA Finals and made a remarkable recovery, despite being 30 at the time. But ever since, he’s had just one season of playing 65-plus games, meaning availability is an issue.

Logic dictates that as a player gets older, his body is more inclined to break down, and that’s regardless of how well anyone takes care of himself — LeBron James excluded, as we’re getting awfully close to deeming him an actual alien. (Although, nagging injuries do appear to be finally creeping in for LeBron.)

As such, teams should consider, in their trade analysis, the possibility of Durant likely missing time and not being available to the same extent as before. Does that remove a first-round pick from the equation? Does it remove several?

That’s obviously up to each team to answer. But it should be a conversation — and an important one.

Overall, let’s make something perfectly clear. Durant is an enormous offensive weapon, even if he’s not as trigger-happy as he should be from the outside. He’ll be an asset anywhere he goes. But the cost of Durant shouldn’t be “whatever’s necessary” if you’re trying to position yourself for the future, and that future is a few years away.

For that matter, even teams that are closer to the Finals shouldn’t relinquish the farm just for the hell of it. As we saw this year in Phoenix, the mere presence of Durant no longer provides you with an automatic playoff berth as it used to.

The team that manages to get Durant into the fold, but maintains significant roster flexibility, is the team that gets it. But seeing as we’re likely in the middle of a bidding war, we could be looking at the acquiring team’s surrendered package and wondering if it was too much.