Google Says Androids Get 58% Fewer Scam Texts Than iPhones, but I Have Some Questions

If you’re getting more scam texts than your friends and family, it turns out it might be your mobile platform, at least going by a recent poll from Google and YouGov. According to Google, users on Android report receiving 58% fewer scam texts than those on iOS, and that number is even better on Pixel devices.

Android Survey

Credit: Google

That data comes from a survey Google and YouGov conducted of over 5,000 Android and iOS users across the U.S., India, and Brazil. The data says that Android users as a whole were “58% more likely than iOS users” to report that they had not received any scam texts in the week prior to the survey, and that iOS users were 65% more likely than Android users to report getting three or more scam texts in a week. On the whole, it also says that Android users were 20% more likely to describe their device’s scam protection features as “very effective” or “extremely effective.”

As for Pixel vs. iPhone specifically, the survey also found that Pixel users were 96% more likely to report zero scam texts than iPhone users, and that iPhone users were 136% more likely to say they had received “a heavy volume of scam messages” than Pixel users, as well as 150% more likely to say their device was “not effective at all in stopping mobile fraud.”

Those numbers don’t look good for Apple, although it’s worth pointing out a few details before taking Google at its word.

What is YouGov?

First, to Google’s credit, it didn’t conduct this study alone. While the company didn’t go into detail on how it partnered with YouGov here, YouGov itself is a respectable entity, widely cited in market research and even political news. The organization specializes in polls, and has been cited in everything from the New York Times to Lifehacker sister publication Mashable.

It’s also worth pointing out that YouGov wasn’t the only independent entity Google worked with while putting together its report. The company also reached out to Counterpoint Research to evaluate its AI-powered anti-scam protections, and Leviathan Security Group to asses scam protection across four Android phones. The company used these studies to put together infographics depicting its security features vs. iPhone’s, which you can see below.

Counterpoint Research numbers regarding Google's AI-powered scam prevention.

Credit: Google

Leviathan Security Group research numbers regarding Google's scam prevention tech.

Credit: Google

Note, however, how Google has put together the information here. Specifically, it implies that iPhone does not offer any scam protections in emails, while ignoring that many iPhone users access their email through the same Gmail app as on Android. It also doesn’t mention Safari’s ability to block pop-ups or the iPhone’s ability to screen phone calls, which makes me think Google might be getting choosy with how its presenting the data here. As such, it’s worth looking at its survey results with a critical eye as well.

Questions about methodology

While Google’s survey results are likely accurate to the polled audience, I do have a few questions about the methodology.

First, there’s the issue with this being a survey, rather than a more dispassionate look at texting inboxes. While helpful for getting insight into how users perceive their devices, surveys are susceptible to the word of those surveyed, which means that can be swayed by respondents misremembering details or misunderstanding questions.

The bigger question to me, though, is sample size. While I commend Google for conducting its survey across three different regions, the company was not clear about how many of its respondents owned iPhones vs. Android devices. It’s possible that iPhone users might have reported more scams simply because the iPhone is more popular in the U.S., for instance. To be fair, those numbers are reversed in India and Brazil, but without knowing a breakdown of how many people Google and YouGov interviewed where, it’s hard to know if the data is being impacted by other factors.

For instance, in addition to potentially being more numerous depending on a breakdown of the surveyed population, iPhone users might also be more susceptible to scam texts simply because scammers might want to target that user base more, as was once the case with viruses on Windows. The iPhone is known as a luxury device, which implies its user base might have extra money to spend, making it an alluring target.

Can you believe Google’s survey?

So, can you take Google’s polling at its word? Yes and no.

With YouGov helping the company out, it’s likely that the results presented are truthful, although they could still be misleading. The only way to know for sure would be to look at a detailed breakdown of the survey itself, but unlike the Counterpoint Research and Leviathan Security Group evaluations, there doesn’t seem to be a way to look at the raw survey data at the moment, just Google’s blog reporting on its findings.

I’ve reached out to Google and YouGov independently with questions about their methodology, and did not immediately hear back. For good measure, I’ve also reached out to Apple for its take, and similarly am still waiting for a reply.

In the meantime, I would take this survey with a grain of salt. It’s almost certainly based in truth, but it’s important to remember that it’s still part of a larger advertising narrative.

Google has made a big deal as of late about calling Apple’s ecosystem a walled garden. If the company can convince users that it can offer them greater freedom while also upping their protection, that would be a big win. It does, however, coincide with Android’s own efforts to close itself off in the name of security, so maybe the truth is both platforms aren’t so different after all.

Meta Is Adding More AI Slop to Your Feeds

I am extremely concerned about the prevalence of AI content on our social media feeds. Now that just about anyone can generate hyper-realistic videos with a simple text prompt, I fear that disinformation will rise exponentially, distorting worldviews faster than algorithms have so far been able to do. So you can imagine how I feel about Meta’s plans to add a “huge corpus” of AI content to its feeds. Good luck out there, everyone.

That’s directly from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg himself. In a Meta Platforms, Inc. earnings call on Wednesday, Zuckerberg confirmed the company’s plans to add this self-described huge corpus of content, thanks to how easy AI makes it to create and “remix” content. People will create AI content, the platform’s recommendation systems will deliver that content to people, who may then slightly alter that content and send it back into the Metaverse. As this feedback loop will continue, feeds will start filling up with more and more AI content. That’s good for Meta, and anyone who enjoys watching videos that aren’t real. For those of us a little sick of this content, or worried we won’t be able to spot it during long scrolling session, it’s only bad news.

While much (if not most) of that AI content is likely coming from outside sources, like OpenAI’s Sora, some of it may come from Meta itself. The company recently rolled out “Vibes,” its own short-form AI video generator, as part of the existing Meta AI app. Users can create videos directly in Vibes, or remix existing videos. I’d wager some Vibes content is going to cross your Meta feed in the near future, if it hasn’t already.

Zuckerberg took the time to highlight how Meta’s AI recommendation systems across all of its core products—Facebook, Instagram, and Threads—are delivering “higher quality and more relevant content” to users, especially with regards to video. Apparently, the amount of time we’ve spent watching Instagram reels has increased by more than 30% when compared to last year. (Fun fact: Reels brings in over $50 billion according to the earnings call.) That environment seems just right to foster a new wave of AI slop to Meta’s enormous audience.

Look, I’ve definitely laughed at some AI memes that have come my way. But to suggest that flooding the feeds with realistic AI videos without any regulation or forethought is a good idea is itself laughable. If you use Meta products, watch out: You might not be able to trust what you’re watching is actually real for much longer—if at all.

NBA Cup 2025: Schedule, format and new courts for this year’s in-season tournament

The Emirates NBA Cup is here. That’s right, the third edition of the league’s in-season tournament begins tomorrow. Here’s what you need to know.


  • Group Play: Friday-Nov. 28
    (Every Friday, plus Tuesday, Nov. 25, and Wednesday, Nov. 26)

  • Quarterfinals: Dec. 9-10

  • Semifinals: Dec. 13

  • Championship: Dec. 16


Each franchise has a new design created by Victor Solomon, fresh for the 2025 tournament. Solomon also created last year’s courts for the tournament and collaborated with Tiffany & Co. on designing the NBA Cup trophy. Check out all 30 courts.


The format hasn’t changed. All 30 teams were placed into groups of five based on last season’s regular-season records and a random drawing, creating three divisions in each conference:

East Group A

  • Cleveland Cavaliers

  • Indiana Pacers

  • Atlanta Hawks

  • Toronto Raptors

  • Washington Wizards

East Group B

  • Boston Celtics

  • Detroit Pistons

  • Orlando Magic

  • Brooklyn Nets

  • Philadelphia 76ers

East Group C

  • New York Knicks

  • Milwaukee Bucks

  • Chicago Bulls

  • Miami Heat

  • Charlotte Hornets

West Group A

  • Oklahoma City Thunder

  • Minnesota Timberwolves

  • Sacramento Kings

  • Phoenix Suns

  • Utah Jazz

West Group B

  • Los Angeles Lakers

  • LA Clippers

  • Memphis Grizzlies

  • Dallas Mavericks

  • New Orleans Pelicans

West Group C

  • Houston Rockets

  • Denver Nuggets

  • Golden State Warriors

  • Portland Trail Blazers

  • San Antonio Spurs

Each team will play four group-play games, one against each opponent in its group, two at home and two on the road. These games will take place every Friday from Oct. 31 to Nov. 28, and additionally on the Tuesday and Wednesday before Thanksgiving.

Eight teams will advance from group play to the knockout rounds: the six group winners and two wild cards. The wild cards are the teams from each conference that finished with the best records among the second-place teams in group play.

According to the NBA, in the event two or more teams are tied within a group, the following tiebreakers will come in to play (in sequential order):

  • Head-to-head record in Group Play

  • Point differential in Group Play (overtime scoring will not count in tiebreaker)

  • Total points scored in Group Play (overtime scoring will not count in tiebreaker)

  • Record from the 2024-25 NBA regular season

  • Random drawing (in the unlikely scenario that two or more teams are still tied following the previous tiebreakers)


The eight teams that advance from group play will take part in a single-elimination tournament. The NBA Cup quarterfinals will be held Dec. 9 and 10, with the higher-seeded teams hosting the quarters in their home arenas. The four winners will advance to the semifinals in Las Vegas.

(During the knockout stage, the 22 teams that didn’t qualify will each play two to-be-determined, regular-season games.)

The NBA Cup semifinals and final will take place on Dec. 13 and Dec. 16, respectively.

Players of the teams that participate in the knockout stage will earn prize money.


The Lakers won the inaugural in-season tournament in 2023, defeating the Pacers. Last season, the Bucks beat the Thunder in the title game.