Pirates make a rare free agency splash, finalizing 2-year, $29M deal with 1B/OF Ryan O’Hearn

PITTSBURG — Ryan O’Hearn finalized a two-year, $29 million deal with Pittsburgh, the Pirates’ first multi-year free agent agreement nearly in a decade.

The left-handed first baseman and outfielder is coming off the best season of his big league career. O’Hearn hit .281 with 17 home runs and 63 RBIs in 2025 and made the All-Star team for the first time while playing for Baltimore and San Diego.

The rare splurge by the Pirates is their second significant acquisition in less than a week. Pittsburgh acquired two-time All-Star second baseman Brandon Lowe from Tampa Bay on Dec. 19 as part of a three-team deal that included sending starting pitcher Mike Burrows to Houston.

Pittsburgh has vowed to build around a pitching staff that includes reigning NL Cy Young Award winner Paul Skenes and rookie Bubba Chandler. The Pirates are coming off a 71-91 season in which the offense finished at or near the bottom of the majors in most significant statistical categories, including runs and home runs.

Randy Arozarena and Mariners agree to 1-year, $15.65 million contract, avoid arbitration

SEATTLE — Outfielder Randy Arozarena and the Seattle Mariners agreed to a one-year, $15.65 million contract, a raise from $11.3 million last year.

Arozarena, 30, is on track to be eligible for free agency after the World Series.

Acquired from Tampa Bay in July 2024, he hit .238 with a career-high 27 homers and had 76 RBIs and a .760 OPS in his first full season with the Mariners.

A seven-year big league veteran and two-time All-Star, Arozarena has a .250 average with 118 homers and 390 RBIs. He was MVP on the 2020 AL Championship Series.

Use RICE to Prioritize Your To-Dos

Whenever you have a bunch of looming tasks—as many of us do at the start of the new year, when everyone actually “circles back” on the things we’ve been putting off—having a structured to-do list is an essential part of getting everything done. Determining what goes on that list and in what order, though, is a task all its own. I’ve covered a lot of ways to do that, but if you’re stuck with a high volume of important responsibilities, you need an approach that matches the complexity of what you’re trying to do—and that’s where the RICE method comes into play.

What is the RICE method of prioritization?

RICE, as you probably guessed, is an acronym. Here’s what it stands for:

  • Reach: How many people or parts of your life or project this task will impact

  • Impact: How meaningful that impact will be if and when it’s done correctly

  • Confidence: How sure you are about your estimates of the other three factors

  • Effort: The time, energy, knowledge, and resources required

A unique combination of those factors is going to give you guidance on which tasks are the most crucial to prioritize, which is helpful when you’re overloaded by information and dread, unable to think about when or where to get started.

How and when to use RICE

I won’t lie to you: This method is more convoluted than some of the others I’ve covered in the past. I might even recommend trying a simpler prioritization technique, like the Eisenhower matrix, before you try this one and only whip this out if Eisenhower or its peers aren’t given you solid results. RICE takes a little time—and that’s because you need to do some math.

Start by writing down all your tasks. Under each, you’re assigning numbers. The Reach score will be the number of people or parts of your life or project that the task will impact and the Impact score is a 3 (massive impact), 2 (high), 1 (medium), .5 (low), or .25 (minimal impact). Confidence should be a 100, 80, or 50, to represent the percentage of confidence you feel in your estimates and abilities. You can use any number between 0 and 100, but falling back on those three just makes it easier. Most adherents of this method use a complicated math equation (determining “person-months”) for Effort, but I’m going to simplify that for you. Score it the same way you scored Impact, with a 3 for multiple days or resources, 2 for a day, 1 for half a day, .5 for an hour, and .25 for a half an hour or less. You can also score Reach that way if you’re working on a personal project and your results won’t necessarily reach a big number of people. In that case, think about the different areas of your life or personal goals it will affect and use that 3-to-.25 scale.

That part is all subjective, similar to using the ABCDE method to assign grades to your to-dos. It can’t be avoided—you won’t know the true resources required or reach of the project until it’s done—but you can quantify it a bit.

Next, you do math. It’s R x I x C divided by E. You’ll end up with a numerical score for each task. Rank the tasks in descending order, with the biggest numbers first. Obviously, you may find that some can’t be completed until others are done, so use your discretion there, but for the most part, you’ve just created a clear outline of which things will have the biggest impact and reach and you can at least know where to start. Add each into your calendar using time boxing and time blocking, then get after it. Knowing you have a plan of attack is half the motivational battle.

Why I Won’t Be Giving ChatGPT Health My Medical Records

This week, OpenAI announced its new ChatGPT Health feature, which will let users upload their medical records and ask health related questions. However, I certainly won’t be making use of it, it might not be the best idea for you to do it either, for both reliability and privacy reasons.

The new ChatGPT Health feature will be a sandboxed tab inside the app that is isolated from your conversation history in other conversations with the chatbot. This tab also allows users to connect a variety of health-tracking apps like Apple Health, MyFitnessPal, and Peloton, as well as uploading medical records directly.


Credit: OpenAI

It’s important to note that this is a lot of really personal information to hand over to any tech company—but especially one that isn’t primarily focused on providing medical services. OpenAI says that the ChatGPT Health space operates with “enhanced privacy to protect sensitive data,” but it doesn’t use end-to-end encryption to secure that data. And while the company says data collected via Health isn’t used to train its foundation models, it’s impossible to know whether that may change in the future. Security breaches can also occur (and have in the past), potentially leaving your medical records exposed.

There’s also the question of whether the risk of uploading your data is worth it in the first place. According to OpenAI’s own data, around 5% of all messages to ChatGPT are already users asking questions about their health, and ChatGPT (and other LLM tools) have a nasty habit of providing inaccurate diagnostic information. This is perhaps why OpenAI says that its new ChatGPT Health feature is “not intended for diagnosis or treatment.”

Currently, there’s a waitlist to sign up for ChatGPT Health, and over time it will roll out to all users. At the very least, that means that until the feature is available, it’s probably a good idea not to ask the regular version of ChatGPT about your health concerns. At the very least, wait until the enhanced privacy sandbox is available. In the meantime, consider whether it makes more sense to just talk to your doctor directly if you have questions or concerns about your health.