Google Is Changing Its Account Policy About Minors Who Turn 13

If you have a Family Account through Google, you might assume you can control what your child can see or do on their device. You can, but, as it happens, only up to a certain point. When your kid turns 13, Google will send them an email, letting them know they can choose to disable your supervision over their account. You get an email too, but they don’t need your permission to lock you out of their device. Once they decide they’re ready for a relatively complete Google Account experience, it’s their choice to make.

Despite being Google’s official policy, this situation was not common knowledge. Following a relatively viral LinkedIn post about the subject, parents were peeved at the notion of Google deciding that their 13 year old was ready to be unsupervised on the internet. Google’s Family Account does allow kids to stay on supervised plans after they turn 13, but they can choose to remove the supervision at any point, which largely defeats the purpose. Unless your child really respects your rules, they likely won’t keep their account locked down when they don’t have to.

Parents can still supervise their 13 year olds’ Google Accounts

Luckily for parents, that’s now changing. In a separate LinkedIn post, Google’s Kate Charlet announced that under a planned policy update, minors will need to get their parents’ permission before disabling supervision. (Charlet also referred to turning 13 as the “age of digital consent,” which seems to me to be an extremely strange way to say “old enough to have an unsupervised Google Account.”)

When I reached out to Google about the changes, the company told me that the policy should now be adjusted. As such, 13-year-olds shouldn’t be able to remove supervision without permission. That said, Google’s support documents have not yet been updated, so it might take some time to fully roll out.

Speaking of Google’s former support documents, the company notes that when kids did choose to remove permissions, their device would lock up temporarily. When I asked Google about this, I was told that due to the change in policy, device lock is no longer a feature. However, it’s still unclear to me how this feature worked when kids could remove permissions on their own: Did parents have to manually unlock the device for their kids? Would devices unlock after a set period of time? I’ve reached back out to Google about these questions, though they might not matter once teens need their parents’ permission.

What does this mean for my child’s Google Account?

As I explain in my post here, removing supervision takes a lot of controls away from parents, and gives teens a lot more responsibility. Parents can’t control screen time, manage payment cards and transactions, and can’t block standard YouTube in favor of YouTube Kids. In addition, kids can choose to stop sharing their location with you if they want to.

But now that parents have the authority here, these controls can continue for your 13-year-old. If you want them to keep their location turned on, they won’t have the option to turn it off; if you want to monitor their transactions, they can’t stop you; if you don’t want them having a credit card, they won’t be able to add one—at least, until you manually disable supervision on your end.

It’s a good thing that Google is giving families more options, and it joins other big tech companies, like Meta, doing the same.

Ja Morant trade rumors: Destinations including Miami, how much might Grizzlies get back in deal?

Ja Morant remains the hottest name in trade speculation, but while there is a lot of smoke, how much fire there is remains in doubt.

The most interesting question may be: Do the Grizzlies already have an acceptable trade lined up and in their back pocket, and are they shopping Morant publicly, hoping another team steps up with a better deal? Or is this it? There’s a lot to talk about, so let’s break it down in bullet points.

• Does Ja Morant want to be in Miami? Yes. At least that’s what NBA insider Rachel Nichols said she heard during the latest episode of the Open Floor podcast with Chris Mannix.

Morant may want to go to Miami, but does Miami want Morant? While the Heat have been star-hunting for a couple of seasons, they might only have interest in Morant if the price was low enough (keep reading the next bullet point about what that might be). Nichols goes on to make an excellent point about the Heat taking a potential flier on Morant.

“Heat Culture is not boot camp for wayward souls. It is not, ‘Oh gee, the Heat will clean him up.’ Heat Culture is, ‘We are tough and we are disciplined, and you either play by our rules or you leave and go home. We are not here to babysit you, hope you get up to our level.’ And that’s why the players who have worked there have really worked.

“Morant, and the way he approaches the game, seems to me to be the opposite of that. I used to live down in Miami, I used to cover that team, it just seems to be the opposite of what that team represents and stands for. And I know he wants to go down there, from what I’ve heard, I just can’t imagine that would be a smart move.”

• East exec rips Morant. Everyone seems to have a fake trade idea for Morant, but many vastly overestimate Morant’s value around the league — this is not the 2021 All-Star version of Moarnat teams would be trading for. Here is what ESPN’s Tim MacMahon said during the latest Hoop Collective podcast:

“He’s not attacking the rim nearly like he used to be. … He’s a bad jump shooter who’s shooting more jump shots than ever. And I’ll just quote an East executive from then: ‘The combination of pain in the a**, injury-prone, not that good anymore, and big contract is a bad one.'”

• Realistic fake trades. About all those fake trades floating around, the return Memphis will get for Morant will be similar to what Atlanta got for Trae Young, who was dealt for expiring contracts. Zach Lowe explained this well on his podcast:

“I saw some fake trade where it was like [Andrew] Wiggins plus [Jamie] Jaquez and two first-round picks, and I was like, ‘What are you smoking?’ The Miami trade is more like [Tyler] Herro plus dead money [Terry Rozier] and not much more than that.

“I think some team will trade something real for him eventually. It’s the ultimate ‘buy low’ thing; He’ll never be this unhealthy. The off-court stuff is hopefully in the rear view. He’s totally unmotivated there, and will get the motivated chip on his shoulder [once traded].”

• Motivated Morant. The idea that there is a Ja Morant revenge tour is what gives him a little more value than Young (that and the fact that Morant has, in the past, shown he can be a decent team defender). That said, Morant has not looked like an All-Star for a few seasons, he’s not been consistently healthy for a while (he has not played six consecutive games since 2023), and he’s not developed a 3-point shot that teams fear (20.8% this season). More concerning, scouts have told NBC Sports that Morant is not driving as much as he used to, not blowing by players and finishing inside (or kicking out) like he once did.

That said, there are teams willing to find out whether that is still in him and if he is motivated. Draymond Green laid out the positive case for Morant on his podcast.

“Needless to say, if Ja Morant is traded, whatever team lands him instantly gets better. Make no mistake—when you have that level of talent, your team improves overnight…. And sometimes when you think about reviving a career, etc., sometimes guys just need a fresh start. And I don’t know that Ja feels he need a fresh start. I don’t know the sentiment around that. But maybe he do. But I think nonetheless, if he does get a fresh start, I think we’ll see the Ja Morant that we’ve grown accustomed to seeing.”

• What might Memphis get in return? Expect the return for Morant in a trade to be a young player with potential who has struggled in his current setting, and expect any picks dealt to be heavily protected, or more likely swaps and second-round picks. Certainly not unprotected firsts. Teams are willing to take a flyer on Morant, but they are not giving up much to do so.

• Long-term money. What makes this trade different from Young and Atlanta is that the Hawks did not want to take back long-term money in any trade, but that is not the case in Memphis. Just last summer, the Grizzlies got four first-round picks and a swap for Desmond Bane, except at least one of those firsts (and really, two) was for taking on Kentavious Caldwell-Pope’s contract (two years and $43 million). The same is true here, Memphis is letting teams know that if they get the right compensation, they will take on a longer contract as part of this trade, according to Kevin O’Connor at Yahoo and other reports.

• Is Toronto a destination? Along those lines, look north of the border. Toronto could be facing win-now pressure, which is why they would be open to a splashy trade, like one for Morant, reports Marc Stein at The Stein Line.

The Raptors want to get off Immanuel Quickley’s salary (he is owed $97.5 million over three guaranteed seasons after this one), and if the Raptors are willing to include the right draft compensation, the Grizzlies will be open to the idea. How well the ball-dominant Morant fits with Scottie Barnes and Brandon Ingram is up for debate (what the Raptors need more is a center) but it’s worth watching, this could be more than just smoke.

• More fake trades.At The Athletic, Zach Harper came up with a couple of realistic Morant trades: One to Brooklyn (a team others have mentioned as a dark horse) and one to Chicago. Would the Bulls want to pair Josh Giddey and Morant, moving Giddey more off the ball? Not sure they do, but Chicago needs talent so if the price was right… maybe?

• Jaren Jackson Jr. In all the talk about a potential Morant trade, other front offices are wondering if the Grizzlies will blow the whole thing up, specifically trading former Defensive Player of the Year Jaren Jackson Jr. (a player a lot of front offices covet). Teams are being told the Grizzlies have no interest in trading him, league sources told NBC Sports. That is not going to stop teams from asking.

This Bose Waterproof Bluetooth Speaker Is $100 Right Now

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

A rugged mini speaker is an essential you’ll get use out of all year, from house parties to camping trips. In the warmer months, you can take it to the beach or BBQs, and in the winter, it’s durable enough to handle snowy adventures and warm up with your favorite playlist during a hot shower. The Bose SoundLink Micro 2nd Gen Bluetooth Speaker is a tiny yet powerful option that fits the bill for all of the above, and right now it’s 23% off at its lowest price ever: $99 (originally $129).

The second-gen Bose SoundLink Micro has richer audio and clarity, as well as battery life that lasts up to 12 hours (twice as long as the first generation). Its appearance is similar to the first, but it’s slightly heavier and larger, measuring 4.0 by 4.0 by 1.7 inches and weighing 11.6 ounces. It comes with a strap that can attach the speaker to bags, handlebars, and more. The controls are located in a groove on the front, including a Shortcut button that lets you pair multiple speakers or activate Spotify Tap. 

Beyond its powerful sound, it’s also one of the most durable mini speakers on the market with an IP67 rating that makes it waterproof and dustproof (though not safe to submerge for extended periods). It’s a mono speaker with a single driver that connects via Bluetooth 5.4 and supports the AAC and SBC codecs, as well as Google Fast Pair. PCMag, which gives it an “excellent rating,” notes that while it includes a USB-A-to-USB-C cable, it would’ve been more helpful to include a standard USB-C cable. 

Despite its high rating, it also doesn’t have the ability to reproduce low frequencies or support high-resolution audio. And unlike the first generation, this model doesn’t have a speakerphone to use for phone calls. The sound performs well despite its portability, and while the bass response isn’t the deepest, it’s impressive for the updated SoundLink Micro’s size. Compared to speakers with fully adjustable EQ, the Bose app EQ is somewhat no-frills and only has three adjustable bands.

Ultimately, if you’re looking for a durable portable speaker with high-quality sound, long battery life, and a versatile strap (but don’t mind that it doesn’t have high-resolution audio or a more advanced equalizer), the Bose Soundlink Micro 2nd Gen Bluetooth Speaker is a solid option worth considering at its current discounted $100 price point. 

Deals are selected by our commerce team

Mets’ David Stearns ‘not blind’ to fan frustration: ‘What we’re doing is the right thing for our franchise’

It’s been an offseason of seismic changes for the Mets, and while there are still plenty of moves to be made between now and the Opening Day, president of baseball operations David Stearns sat down with reporters on Tuesday to discuss where things currently stand with the club.

The Mets have already said goodbye to Edwin Diaz, Pete Alonso, Brandon Nimmo, and Jeff McNeil this offseason, but Stearns believes the organization is in a very good spot, and with good reasoning.

“We’ve said goodbye to players who have performed really well here, people we care a lot about, players that out fans care a lot about who have meshed well with our community, who have done what we as organization have asked them to do for a long time, and that’s really tough and we all recognize that,” Stearns said. “And we’re doing all of that because we are committed universally, from ownership down, to ensure that the next five years of the Mets are better, and that we win more games and meet the lofty expectations that we have for ourselves, than what we’ve done previously. What we’ve done previously has not been good enough. We all know that, I certainly know that, and we’ve got to do better. And we’re committed to doing that.

“We have tremendous ownership support to do that. We have elite talent at the top of our major league roster. We’ve got a very good farm system, and we’ve got a very good present-day major league team as we sit here today that’s going to get better before we get to Opening Day.”

Stearns added that the Mets currently have a mix of “truly elite talent on our major league team, combined with some young players who have already established themselves at the major league level and are ready to take that next step.”

“We have this pretty unique combination right now of MVP-caliber talent up top, players who have already established themselves at the major league level who are at that point of their career where there is the potential – not the certainty, but the potential – for a jump, and really exciting premium young prospects who are about to hit the major league level,” Stearns said. “That is an enviable place for any organization to be.” 

The timing of these statements is certainly of note, considering there’s now reporting that the Mets have offered All-Star Kyle Tucker a short-team deal worth $50 million per season.

Losing fan-favorite pieces like Diaz and Alonso hasn’t been an easy pill to swallow, but potentially adding Tucker, the best position player available via free agency this year, would completely change the narrative for the Mets.

And Stearns is committed to doing whatever it takes to achieve the ultimate goal.

“I certainly understand that there have been points this offseason that have been frustrating for our fan base. We’re not blind to that at all,” Stearns said. “I’m certainly not blind to that. I hear it, I recognize it. I hear it from my friends and family at times. I’m also very convicted that what we are doing is the right thing for our franchise going forward to accomplish our goals of creating a consistent playoff team, a team that year after year is a true World Series contender, and ultimately a team that does what we are all here to do, which is to win a World Series. And that’s why we are doing all of this.”

Check This iPhone Setting to Make Texting Better for Everyone

Hey, would you mind doing me a favor real quick? If you’re on an iPhone, can you double check that you’ve got RCS chat enabled for me? Thanks, I appreciate it. See, as an Android user, I don’t get to use all the fun iMessage features, but RCS lets us share some of them. The only problem is, iPhones seem to sometimes disable RCS for some chats after an update. Or for no reason at all.

RCS has been around for a while, but since it needs to be supported on both the carrier and device level, it’s taken some time to reach ubiquity. Understandably, you might have seen some chat conversations between iOS and Android users that still default to the older SMS-style texting, and just gone about your day. However, these days, if you’re chatting with your Android friends and you don’t see read receipts, or your pictures and videos are coming through in potato quality, there’s probably an easy fix.

To check if RCS is enabled on your phone:

  1. Open the Settings app on your iOS device, then go to Apps.

  2. Go to Messages > RCS Messaging

  3. Enable the RCS Messaging toggle.

And that’s it! If you text your contacts from multiple devices, it’s also worth checking for RCS support on each of them. It might be a little annoying, but trust me, your Android friends will thank you.

If you’re the one using an Android phone, it can also be worth double-checking that RCS support is enabled, although it’s less likely to be a problem. While iOS devices support both iMessage and RCS as robust texting options, Android only has RCS. Both platforms can fall back to SMS, but your Android phone probably reaches for RCS as a default.

Still, it can’t hurt to check. The specific directions will differ based on manufacturer, but generally you can go to your default messaging app’s settings and look for an “RCS Chats” section to make sure the protocol is enabled on your end as well.

This Budget 65-Inch Hisense QLED TV Is Over $300 Off

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Budget TVs have improved dramatically over the years, and the Hisense U6 Series is a great example of what you can get today for a “budget” price. This is a QLED Mini LED TV, so while it’s not at the quality that OLED TVs can offer, it makes up for it with a much lower price. Right now, the 65-inch Hisense Class U6 Series TV is $529.96 (originally $847.99), the lowest price it has been, according to price-checking tools.

Don’t let the budget price fool you; this is a quality TV. The best one of 2025, according to PCMag’s “outstanding” review. Its main attributes are its incredible levels of brightness, peaking at 1,024 nits, and its beautiful colors. This is expected from a QLED Mini LED TV, but not for under $550 for a 65-inch TV. It is also packed with features and specs that you won’t find in other TVs at this price.

The refresh rate is 144Hz with VRR and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, making it a good option to play games. You’ll get an input lag of 4.6 ms at 1080p and 13.1 ms at 4K. For those who pay premium in their streaming apps for HDR, you’ll be able to take advantage of HDR10+ and Dolby Vision IQ. If you have a surround sound system, you’ll also be able to take advantage of Dolby Atmos for a more immersive, 3D sound.

The biggest downside, in my opinion, is that the OS is Amazon’s Fire TV, but that’s fixable with a TV stick, and also down to preference. While there is no hands-free voice control, there is Apple AirPlay for casting devices.

If you’re looking for a 65-inch TV that punches above its price tag, is at a great discount, offers great colors, brightness, and features, get the Hisense Class U6 Series TV.

Deals are selected by our commerce team