The Best Apple Fritters Are Made With Instant Pancake Mix

There are many types of apple fritters—the thick, doughnutty yeast-raised sort, or the lightly battered apple rings—but it’s the craggy, apple-chunk-studded, soft on the inside but crisp on the outside variety that I love. I’ve had trouble in the past with getting the right consistency and thickness for the batter, but I’m happy to report that the absolute best apple fritter is also the easiest. All you need to get fritterin’ is an apple and some pancake mix.

I once made yeast-raised apple fritters. It took several painstaking hours because of the proof time. The apples popped out every which way, and the finished fritters ended up so thick that the centers didn’t cook through. It was tragic. However, this pancake mix fritter experiment is a completely different story. 

I decided to look into chemically raised flours (like baking powder) to get a lighter dough, and soon realized that all you need are ingredients typical to pancake mix. So why not make my life easier and just use pancake mix? The resulting apple fritter is pure fried-apple perfection. It’s crisp on the exterior and tender on the inside (but, thankfully, completely cooked through), and the simple vanilla glaze is just the nudge it needs to send it over into “special occasion treat” territory. The apple gods have given us a gift, my friends. Use it well.

This recipe uses the typical “complete” pancake mix that you can get at any grocery store, and the batter needs little else but apple chunks and water, which nearly eliminates the prep time. Mixing the batter happens faster than it takes to heat up a small pot of frying oil. 

How to make quick apple fritters

1. Peel and chop an apple of your choosing

I used a Cortland apple because it was in my fridge. I usually use Fuji or Golden Delicious for baking pies, but frying happens so fast I think any apple you like will hold up well enough. Cut the apple chunks to be about a third of an inch. They don’t have to be precise, but cubes somewhere just under a half inch in size.

2. Mix the batter

Apple chunks tossed in pancake mix.

Credit: Allie Chanthorn Reinmann

Add two inches of frying oil to a small pot, and heat it to 375°F. Add one cup of complete pancake mix to a medium mixing bowl. I used a Shoprite’s store brand pancake mix. Stir in a teaspoon of ground cinnamon. Add the apples to the dry mixture and toss them around so they’re thoroughly coated. When the oil is up to temperature, add a half cup of cool water to the mixing bowl and stir until there are no more dry patches left and a thick batter has formed.

3. Fry the fritters

Apple fritter batter in a bowl.

Credit: Allie Chanthorn Reinmann

Scoop large spoonfuls (about a heaping quarter cup) of batter into the oil and fry for one minute per side. Try to keep the oil’s temperature around 360°F to 375°F to keep the cooking time accurate and ensure the fritters don’t over brown or become heavy with oil. The fritters will puff dramatically, so be sure not to crowd the pot if you’re frying more than one at a time.

Freshly fried apple fritters on a wire rack cooling.

Credit: Allie Chanthorn Reinmann

Dab the fritters dry on a paper towel (or use one of these alternative methods), and let them cool on a wire rack while you fry the rest of the batter. When you’re finished frying, make the glaze. A great fritter simply must have a thin veil of translucent, crackly sugar glaze. 

4. Dunk them in vanilla glaze

Mix confectioner’s sugar, vanilla extract, a pinch of salt, and water in a deep bowl until no lumps remain. The glaze should be thick but loose. Put one fritter in the bowl and use a spoon to scoop and drape the glaze over the top until it’s been completely coated. Lift the fritter out with a fork and return it to the wire rack to drip-dry. Repeat this with all the fritters. 

The glaze dries out on top but once you take a bite you’ll get a parade of flavors and textures. A mixture of crisp and soft followed by a symphony of apple, cinnamon, vanilla, and malty fried dough. This recipe makes five four-inch apple fritters, but you can certainly double the recipe for a greater need.

Easy Apple Fritters With Pancake Mix

Ingredients:

  • 1 cup complete pancake mix 

  • 1 teaspoon ground cinnamon

  • 1 medium apple, chopped (about 1 ¼ cups of chunks)

  • ½ cup water

  • Oil for frying

For the icing glaze

  • 2 cups confectioners sugar

  • ¼ teaspoon vanilla extract

  • ¼ teaspoon salt

  • ¼ cup water

1. In a small pot, heat two inches of frying oil to 375°F. Place a wire cooling rack over a sheet tray. 

2. Add the complete pancake mix to a medium-sized mixing bowl. Mix in the cinnamon. Add the chopped apple to the dry ingredients and toss until thoroughly coated. When the oil is ready, stir the water into the mixing bowl until no dry patches remain and a thick batter forms.

3. Scoop the batter into the frying oil, about quarter-cup scoops, and let each fritter fry for one minute on each side. They should become puffed and well-browned. Dab the excess oil off on a paper towel and let them dry on the wire rack. Repeat with the rest of the batter.

4. For the glaze, mix all of the ingredients together in a deep bowl until all the lumps dissolve. Add one apple fritter to the bowl at a time and use a spoon to help cover the top completely in icing. Scoop it out with a fork and allow excess icing to drip off briefly before returning it to the wire rack to dry. Repeat with the remaining fritters. Enjoy with a hot cup of tea for breakfast or a mug of glögg for a great night.

35 of the Best Movies That Clock in at 90 Minutes or Less

It’s not your imagination: From Dune to The Batman, Killers of the Flower Moon, and Oppenheimer, the biggest blockbuster movies really are getting longer. Maybe it’s due to directorial excess, or the need for everything to be filled with enough backstory to spin up a franchise, or simply because it’s harder to get people out to theaters so studios want to make it seem like every big film is an event. (Yes, some movies also really do need to be that long—but did No Time to Die really need to be that long?)

And sure, long movies are sometimes great, but length isn’t always (or even often) an arbiter of quality. Heck, some of the greatest films in history—across decades and a wide swath of genres—tell their stories very effectively in 90 minutes or less. What follows, in order of length, are 35 of the best, shortest movies ever, each one worth (not that much of) your time.


Detour (1945)

Running time: 68 minutes

It’s not a rule, exactly, but noir films seem to thrive at around 90 minutes—that being, perhaps, the approximate limit of our ability to watch a character descend into inescapable darkness. For a lot less time than that, Detour follows Al Roberts, a small-time piano player who comes into some cash and decides to hitchhike across the country in pursuit of his best girl, who ran off to Hollywood to be a star; unsurprisingly, he encounters some bumps along the road when someone who picks him up winds up dead and Al sorta accidentally assumes his identity. 

The picture was made sloppily and on the cheap, but somehow became a classic in spite of all that. It’s now in the public domain and free on YouTube, though as it has recently been restored, you’re better off catching it on one of the big streamers.

Where to stream: Prime Video, The Criterion Channel, Tubi, Pluto TV


Frankenstein (1931)

Running time: 71 minutes

One of the earliest and nearly the best (second only to its sequel) of the Universal horror classics, Frankenstein squeezes enough iconic imagery into 71 minutes that it has remained fresh for almost a century.

Where to stream: Classix


The Hitch-Hiker (1953)

Running time: 71 minutes

A couple of friends heading out for a fishing trip pick up a passenger, one who just happens to be a thrill killer responsible for several earlier robberies and murders. That tense premise plays out perfectly under the careful eye of director Ida Lupino, an actress as well as one of the very few women directing American films during the ‘50s.

Where to stream: Prime Video, Vudu, Tubi, Pluto TV


The Set-Up (1949)

Running time: 72 minutes

The wildly eclectic Robert Wise (West Side Story, The Day the Earth Stood Still, The Sound of Music, Star Trek: The Motion Picture, etc.) directed The Set-Up, with all of the grit and sweat required of a movie of its kind (that being a film noir sports drama), scraping off all the gloss of his prestige pictures. The result is one of the best boxing movies of all time, as well as one of the very best noirs.

Where to stream: Watch TCM


Petite Maman (2021)

Running time: 72 minutes

Portrait of a Lady on Fire director Céline Sciamma took a hard left turn for her followup film, a gentle, poignant coming-of-age story. A young girl mourning the death of her beloved grandmother helps her parents clean out the family home. One day while playing in the woods, she meets another little girl exactly her age. I can’t really tell you more than that, except to say that the slow build to the reveal of who the girl is will have a shattering effect on anyone who has ever been a parent, or had one.

Where to stream: Hulu


Safety Last (1923)

Running time: 73 minutes

Buster Keaton was more daring, and Charlie Chaplin more poignant, but Harold Lloyd was more purely focused on laughs, and no less brilliant than his better-remembered contemporaries. Safety Last! is his most famous film (thanks to the memorable clock scene), and it’s also very nearly his best, with a lot more plot and gags than just the clock bit.

Where to stream: HBO Max, The Criterion Channel


Cat People (1942)

Running time: 73 minutes

Producer Val Lewton traded freedom for prestige early in his career, taking over RKO’s B-movie unit and making shorter movies for cheap. There were very few restrictions placed on him, except for the stipulation that the movies needed lurid titles to draw attention—and, so: Cat People, ostensibly about a new bride who turns into a panther, but really a beautifully shot psychosexual drama about sublimated desire.

Where to stream: The Criterion Channel


The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)

Running time: 76 minutes

It took a while for Tim Burton’s Henry Selick’s The Nightmare Before Christmas to catch on with audiences (and we can probably thank Hot Topic for transforming it into a cultural phenomenon), but those of us who saw it in theaters in 1993 knew it was an instant classic. A sweet and scary seasonal gem about what happens when the king of Halloween gets bored with his holiday and decides he can make Christmas better (or at least bring some severed heads into the mix), it’s likely a slim 76 minutes because of the complexities of stop motion animation, but it’s also the perfect length for an adaptation of the original Tim Burton illustrated poem.

Where to stream: Disney+


Nothing Sacred (1937)

Running time: 77 minutes

Comedy, like horror, often thrives at a shorter length, never getting a chance to wear out its welcome. Carole Lombard is great in this smart screwball, playing a hick from a nothing town in Vermont who’s brought to New York City by a cynical reporter (Fredric March) desperate for content. it seems she’s dying of radium poisoning, and the story about her poignant last night on earth will be a headline grabber. Except that she’s not dying—it’s all a scam, and a satire of both the manipulative tabloid press and our hunger for tragic tales that feels at least as relevant nearly 75 years later.

Where to stream: Prime Video, The Roku Channel, Tubi, Pluto TV


Primer (2004)

Running time: 77 minutes

Writer/director Shane Carruth spent basically nothing (allegedly $7,000) to make this impossibly complex sci-fi tale about two Bill Gates-style computer geniuses who hack together a functional time machine in their garage and proceed to use it to fuck up each other’s lives in profound ways. To say more would lessen the impact of this stone cold lo-fi classic.

Where to stream: Digital rental


Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1993)

Running time: 78 minutes

Superhero movies rarely clock in at anything under 6 hours (some of them feel that way, at least), but perhaps it’s not surprising that one of the best is much shorter… and a cartoon. A theatrical spin-off of the revered Batman animated series of the ‘90s, Phantasm sees an old flame reenter Bruce Wayne’s life even as a new vigilante arrives in Gotham. It’s tippy-top-tier Batman, cartoon or no.

Where to stream: HBO Max


Paris Is Burning (1991)

Running time: 78 minutes

This landmark queer documentary explores, with clear-eyed affection and occasionally brutal honesty, the heyday of so-called “ballroom culture” in NYC, when queer and trans performers, marginalized in their day to day lives, would glam up and cast off the prejudices of society and the grim reality of the AIDS crisis to strut down the catwalk and lip sync for their lives. It’s a celebration of found family, and a profile of a community and a cultural movement that would, decades later, find wider recognition in shows like Pose and RuPaul’s Drag Race.

Where to stream: HBO Max, The Criterion Channel


Rope (1948)

Running time: 80 minutes

Hitchcock’s great experiment almost had to be on the short side, given the constraint he placed upon the movie: the whole thing had to look as though it were filmed in one continuous take (in reality, it’s a series of ten-minute takes, if only because that was the most film the cameras of the day could hold). Snooty lovers played by John Dall and Farley Granger stage an elaborate dinner party while concealing the body of a former classmate in nearly plain sight—see if you can spot the culprit.

Where to stream: The Criterion Channel


Before Sunset (2004)

Running time: 80 minutes

Sequels are often longer than the original, so it’s a tribute to director Richard Linklater that he’s able to accomplish more in the followup to 1995’s swoonily romantic two-hander Before Sunrise even with a run time that’s 20 minutes shorter. It helps that the brisk film ends beautifully, memorably—and abruptly.

Where to stream: Digital rental


Run Lola Run (1998)

Running time: 80 minutes

This German import is more than two decades old, and yet I’m still hesitant to spoil the twist of the thematic engine that drives it, so I’ll just say Franke Potente never stops moving throughout its one hour and 20-minute runtime; it’s a thriller that kicks like a caffeine-addled late night video game binge, and if it was a minute longer, she (and the premise) would have collapsed from exhaustion.

Where to stream: Digital rental


Killer of Sheep (1978)

Running time: 80 minutes

Director Charles Burnett brought Italian-style neo-realism to Watts in the ‘70s in telling the story of Stan, who works long hours at an L.A. slaughterhouse. This portrait of a Black working class family is funny and frequently profound, and was only recently recovered and restored.

Where to stream: Kanopy


Toy Story (1995)

Running time: 81 minutes

Speaking of keeping animation short and sweet, Pixar used to be able to do it. These days many of their films approach (or exceed) two hours—it’s understandable, they’ve earned our patience—but it’s no accident that the shortest of the Toy Story films is still arguably the best, a perfect execution of an absolutely impeccable premise. (Yes, it’s likely only this short because it’s also the first all-CGI movie ever, but sometimes constraints aren’t weaknesses.)

Where to stream: Disney+


Rye Lane (2022)

Running time: 82 minutes

Imagine Trainspotting-era Danny Boyle making an Elizabethtown-style romcom, except it’s actually good, and you’ll have a fairly accurate idea of what to expect from the charming debut film from director Raine Allen-Miller. Two mid-20s South Londoners meet shortly after each has suffered a bad breakup; they proceed to help one another get over their respective exes, and I’m sure you see where this is going, but you’ll be smiling the entire way.

Where to stream: Hulu


She’s Gotta Have It (1986)

Running time: 84 minutes

Spike Lee’s first feature film launched his career with the story of a woman (Tracy Camilla Johns) enjoying the type of sexual freedom typically granted to men. It’s smart, funny, and surprisingly sex positive, if a little problematic by modern standards.

Where to stream: Digital rental


High Noon (1952)

Running time: 85 minutes

Though it seems subtle today, High Noon’s anti-blacklist, anti-witchhunt politics were so clear to audiences at the time that John Wayne called it “the most un-American thing I’ve ever seen in my whole life.” Any movie that pissed off John Wayne that much is fine by me. He made the much-longer Rio Bravo in response and… well, that movie’s also a classic, but it’s 2 hours and 21 minutes long. High Noon does much more with less, and holds up much better.

Where to stream: Prime Video, Paramount+, MGM+


Fruitvale Station (2013)

Running time: 85 minutes

Dramas based on real events tend to be drawn out, but it’s the straightforward efficiency of Ryan Coogler’s first feature, based on the real-life killing by police of a young, unarmed Black man in Oakland, that makes it so beautiful, and so harrowing.

Where to stream: Freevee, The Roku Channel


Evil Dead (1981)

Running time: 85 minutes

Some movies are on the short side simply because it’s cheaper that way. That may or may not be the case with Sam Raimi’s horror comedy cult favorite, but Evil Dead doesn’t suffer one bit from its truncated runtime. In fact, every movie in the eventual franchise comes in at around the 90-minute mark, give or take, this one having established the perfect length for gross-out practical horror.

Where to stream: AMC+


What We Do in the Shadows (2014)

Running time: 85 minutes

A New Zealand horror mockumentary that launched an unlikely franchise, this movie packs a lot of jokes into 85 minutes.

Where to stream: Digital rental


My Neighbor Totoro (1986)

Running time: 86 minutes

Animation being a complicated and sometimes expensive proposition, films in the medium tend to run shorter than live-action features. Surprisingly, director Hayao Miyazaki’s beloved Studio Ghibli movies tend to run closer to the two-hour range (he can take as long as he wants, really), but an exception is the classic My Neighbor Totoro, about two girls and their adventures with wood sprites in rural Japan. It’s pretty much a perfect movie from the first frame to the last.

Where to stream: HBO Max


Polyester (1981)

Running time: 86 minutes

Even at a brisk 86 minutes, John Waters manages to pack a lot of raunchy laughs into this, his best, if not his most outrageous, movie. It doesn’t matter if you catch that the story of beleaguered suburban housewife Francine Fishpaw (played gloriously by the iconic Devine), who watches as her seemingly picture perfect family falls prey to sex and depravity, is a pitch-perfect parody of Douglas Sirk melodramas; it’s still gloriously, subversively hilarious throughout (and even better in Odorama).

Where to stream: Digital rental


The Palm Beach Story (1942)

Running time: 88 minutes

Claudette Colbert is on the lookout for a rich husband, though she’s already married to an inventor played by Joel McCrea. No matter—they love each other, but could use the money that a second husband could bring in. This could have been a dark satire, but as directed by Preston Sturges, it’s as big-hearted as it is silly.

Where to stream: Digital rental


Rashomon (1950)

Running time: 88 minutes

You could tell me that Akira Kurosawa’s much-imitated rumination on the nature of justice and the frailty of memory is only 88 minutes long, but I’m pretty sure I remember it differently. Consider this proof that an all-time classic doesn’t need to take all night to sit through.

Where to stream: HBO Max, The Criterion Channel


Videodrome (1983)

Running time: 88 minutes

All hail the new flesh! David Cronenberg’s legendarily weird horror classic has all the slick (literally) body horror imagery that is the director’s calling card, but it’s also a sly commentary on the subversive power of media in the analogue age, following an amoral TV producer (James Woods, rarely better) as he searches for the secret behind Videodrome, a pirate broadcast of explicit violent and sexual imagery that might actually be more than mere fiction. Debbie Harry costars, looking hot as hell (obviously).

Where to stream: Digital rental


Airplane! (1980)

Running time: 88 minutes

There are so many memorable moments and lines here, and they come at such an incredibly fast clip. It’s maybe not the greatest slapstick comedy of all time, but it “shirley” has one of the highest hit-to-miss ratios—even some of its doofiest gags are still good for a chuckle, 41 years later.

Where to stream: Prime Video


Crank (2006)

Running time: 88 minutes

There’s such an effective high-concept here, it is 100% possible, and very much advised, to look past any of the film’s inherent silliness and just admire it on that merit. Jason Statham plays Chev Chelios, a man poisoned in such a way that he needs to keep his adrenaline levels at a constant maximum, or he’ll die. How he keeps ramping himself up, well, that’s the fun part. It’s loud and gleefully over-the-top, and it would totally collapse if it was even a few minutes longer.

Where to stream: Peacock


Attack the Block (2011)

Running time: 88 minutes

The movie that teamed John Boyega with future Doctor Who Jodie Whitaker is unique in spotlighting a British street gang living on a council estate who also happen to be the only hope against brilliantly designed alien invaders. It’s too much madness for more than 90 minutes.

Where to stream: Paramount+


Stand By Me (1986)

Running time: 89 minutes

Stand By Me doesn’t feel short and, in this case, that’s not an insult. The unlikely Stephen King adaptation doesn’t waste a second of its runtime, with director Rob Reiner crafting one indelible, nostalgia-for-childhood drenched scene after another as he tells the story of a group of friends who head out into the woods in pursuit of rumors there’s a dead body to be gawked at.

Where to stream: Netflix, AMC+


The Thin Man (1934)

Running time: 90 minutes

The onscreen couple that set the template for some of the best relationships (without really being bested) in film history began here. I’ve seen this movie multiple times and I couldn’t tell you a thing about the central mystery—only because the boozy chemistry between Myrna Loy and William Powell is the real draw.

Where to stream: Digital rental


Eyes Without a Face (1960)

Running time: 90 minutes

Time has lent some class to this French classic, praised and derided equally upon its release for its gross-out effects (which are incredibly tame by today’s standards). When able to see past the horror elements, the film plays more like a dark fairy tale, brutal, but weirdly poetic and beautiful.

Where to stream: HBO Max, The Criterion Channel


Marcel the Shell With Shoes On (2022)

Running time: 90 minutes

Ninety minutes might sound like too long for a movie adaptation of a series of 5-minute YouTube shorts, but I’d be happy to spend a lot longer with Marcel, who is indeed a shell with shoes on, and just the sweetest little sentient mollusk casing you’ve ever met. This faux-documentary follows Marcel as he searches for his missing family, and I’m not kidding when I say that Isabella Rossellini gives an award-caliber performance as his grandmother. Who is also a shell.

Where to stream: Paramount+

What (and When) to Eat on a Long Run

Watch a marathon, and you’ll see runners sucking down packets of goo to keep them going as the hours tick by. If you’ve set your sights on a marathon, a half-marathon, or any long-distance endurance event, you’ll benefit from fueling on the go as well. But how long a run are we talking, how often do you need to eat, and what do you need to eat? Here’s your instruction manual.

Why eat on long runs?

Of the three main macronutrients—fats, carbs, and protein—carbs make the biggest difference when it comes to exercise performance. Your body is always burning fat at some level (even when you’re asleep), but the harder you work, the more carbs it wants to shovel into the furnace. 

Our muscles store carbs in a form called glycogen. If you’ve ever “carb loaded” with a pasta dinner, you were filling up your glycogen stores. We also have carbs floating through our bloodstream—this is what “blood glucose” means. During exercise, our bodies use both of these sources. 

For short workouts, we have plenty of glycogen to carry us through. But for a multi-hour run (or hike or bike ride), we’ll need to supply more carbs so our muscles can keep working at our desired pace. Eating during a workout, to improve or maintain performance during that workout, is often referred to as “fueling.”

Do you need to fuel on long runs? Technically, no. Our bodies can work for a long time whether we eat or not. But as our internal carb supplies diminish, we’ll feel sluggish and we’ll slow down. We may also have a harder time recovering from that run afterward. If you usually do long runs on an empty stomach, try fueling for your next one. You’ll notice a big difference in how you feel.

How long of a run requires fueling? 

Many athletes will draw the line at about 90 minutes: if your workout is shorter than that, no need to eat on the go. If you’ll be working for 90 minutes or more, that’s when you should pack some gels (or other foods, as we’ll discuss below). 

But there’s room for experimentation. You don’t have to forgo the fueling if your run is 89 minutes. In fact, if you’re preparing for a race, you may want to practice fueling even on shorter (say, 60-minute) runs just to get into the habit and give yourself more opportunities to see what works for you. 

How much do I need to eat on a long run? 

The general recommendation is to aim for 30 to 60 grams of carbohydrate per hour. Most people will naturally go for the lower end of this range; one gel packet per hour will only give you about 22 grams. 

But research shows that people tend to feel and perform better when they have more carbs. Three gels per hour would be 66 grams of carbs, and that would be fine. (Some cyclists have gone well above that range with good results, but cyclists also don’t have to deal with their belly sloshing around like runners do.) 

If you’re new to fueling, you can start with the lower end of the range if you like. A gel every 45 minutes may be a good place to start. 

You’ll also want to make sure to start with some carbs already in your belly. Some runners like to take a gel (or their preferred fuel source) at the start line; I’ll do that on race days but for training days I just make sure to have a carby breakfast before heading out for my long run.

What makes a food good for endurance fueling?

The simple answer is that we want carbs that digest quickly. Glucose, a sugar, is the carb that we use most readily. Starches—like what you find in bread, rice, and potatoes—break down easily into glucose, so they’re a good source. Sugar, in the sense of table sugar, contains glucose and fructose. (There’s evidence suggesting that we can absorb a mix of sugars better than if we only had one type of sugar, so many sports nutrition products will use a mix.)

The ideal foods to eat during (or immediately before) endurance exercise: 

  • Contain carbs in the form of sugar or starches

  • Don’t contain much fat, fiber, or protein (because these can slow down digestion—we want those carbs fast)

  • Can be mushed around for hours in a pocket and still be edible

  • Agree with your stomach

That last one is important! Stomachs vary, so what works for one runner may make another queasy. I’ve never had trouble with any of the standard options (which we’ll discuss in a moment), but I still wouldn’t try something on race day that I hadn’t tested in training—just in case.

Can you fuel with drinks? 

There are sports drinks that say they contain enough carbs to fuel your training. You can fuel with drinks, but there’s a problem with many of them. 

When you spend hours chugging certain sports drinks, your intestines can get unhappy with the concentration of sugar water inside them. In other words, you’ll get what runners politely call “GI [gastrointestinal] distress.” This can take the form of burbling guts, farting, and—far more often than we’d like to admit—diarrhea. 

The ratio of sugar to water seems to be what causes this. Full-strength Gatorade is notorious for setting off bouts of diarrhea if you drink enough of it. Water it down to half-strength, though, and you’ll likely be fine. 

Remember that the marketing niche for most sports drinks is “provides electrolytes and tastes good,” not “will get you through a marathon without shitting your pants.” If you want your carbs in liquid form, look for something marketed toward athletes for that exact purpose, like Tailwind. Its sugar concentration is a lot easier on the gut.

Fueling options you can buy

The standard, simplest way of fueling, assuming money is no object, is to just get yourself a supply of gels. These are packets of carbohydrate goo (literally, one of the brand names is Gu) that fit the requirements above. Some popular brands include:

Some gel flavors come with caffeine, and some don’t, so read the label to be sure you’re getting whichever you prefer. (Caffeine can improve athletic performance, but can also keep you up at night. You may want caffeinated gels for morning workouts but not evening ones, perhaps.)

If you’re wondering which brands or flavors taste the best, allow me to save you a lot of time and trial-and-error: They all suck. When you’re 12 miles into your long run, you’ll hate them all. I found the coffee and caramel flavors to be the least disgusting when I started, but at this point I’m beyond caring. 

If you want something you can buy at a store, but that isn’t a gel, try these: 

Each of these items contains about the same amount of carbs per package as the gels above, but be sure to check the label; they’re not exactly equivalent. The Honey Stinger Waffles also contain slightly more calories than the others for a similar amount of carbohydrate, which may or may not matter to you.

Cheaper and less-processed options for long run fueling

When you run a lot, you can easily spend a ton of money on gels and other products. But remember what makes good run fuel—it doesn’t have to be a commercially processed, sport-scientist-optimized packaged product. It can just be any old food with carbs. (That said, we will attempt to forget Heinz’s push to make ketchup packets into running fuel.) 

Some good grocery-store options, which I’ll list with carb content so you can compare to the 20-25 grams in a typical gel: 

You can also get a similar amount of carbs from: 

  • A medium banana – assuming you’re OK with that much chewing, and that the banana wasn’t smushed en route. 

  • Half a peanut butter and jelly sandwich – go light on the peanut butter or skip it entirely for easier digestion.

  • An ounce of raisins – some trail runners swear by dried fruit, but it has a higher fiber content than many of the items above.

  • Packets of honey or jam (two packets per serving) – note that these are free if you swipe them from your hotel’s breakfast bar when traveling.

  • Pouches of applesauce or baby food – check the label, since carb content varies.

Don’t forget that you can just look around your kitchen and grab whatever seems appetizing. Cookies may not be “optimal” running fuel, but they have fueled many a run. Just make sure to test out a new fuel on shorter runs before relying on it for a long run or race day. 

Today’s Wordle Hints (and Answer) for Friday, January 19, 2024

If you’re looking for the Wordle answer for January 19, 2024, read on. We’ll share some clues, tips, and strategies, and finally the solution. Today’s puzzle is medium difficulty; I got it in four. Beware, there are spoilers below for January 19, Wordle #944! Keep scrolling if you want some hints (and then the answer) to today’s Wordle game.

How to play Wordle

Wordle lives here on the New York Times website. A new puzzle goes live every day at midnight, your local time.

Start by guessing a five-letter word. The letters of the word will turn green if they’re correct, yellow if you have the right letter in the wrong place, or gray if the letter isn’t in the day’s secret word at all. For more, check out our guide to playing Wordle here, and my strategy guide here for more advanced tips. (We also have more information at the bottom of this post, after the hints and answers.)

Ready for the hints? Let’s go!


Does today’s Wordle have any unusual letters?

We’ll define common letters as those that appear in the old typesetters’ phrase ETAOIN SHRDLU. (Memorize this! Pronounce it “Edwin Shirdloo,” like a name, and pretend he’s a friend of yours.)

Four of the letters are common ones today. The other one is, I’d say, medium-common. 

Can you give me a hint for today’s Wordle?

It’s a character from the Addams Family, sort of. 

Does today’s Wordle have any double or repeated letters?

Nope, not today. 

How many vowels are in today’s Wordle?

There is only one vowel today.

What letter does today’s Wordle start with?

Today’s word starts with T.

What letter does today’s Wordle end with?

Today’s word ends with K.

What is the solution to today’s Wordle?

Ready? Today’s word is THING.

How I solved today’s Wordle

After ARISE and TOUCH, I was only considering THING and THINK–THING would be too easy, so I went for THINK. I guessed wrong. 

Wordle 944 4/6

⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜
🟩⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

A primer on Wordle basics

The idea of Wordle is to guess the day’s secret word. When you first open the Wordle game, you’ll see an empty grid of letters. It’s up to you to make the first move: type in any five-letter word. 

Now, you can use the colors that are revealed to get clues about the word: 

  • Green means you correctly guessed a letter, and it’s in the correct position. (For example, if you guess PARTY, and the word is actually PURSE, the P and R will be green.)

  • Yellow means the letter is somewhere in the word, but not in the position you guessed it. (For example, if you guessed PARTY, but the word is actually ROAST, the R, A and T will all be yellow.)

  • Gray means the letter is not in the solution word at all. (If you guessed PARTY and everything is gray, then the solution cannot be PURSE or ROAST.)

With all that in mind, guess another word, and then another, trying to land on the correct word before you run out of chances. You get six guesses, and then it’s game over.

The best starter words for Wordle

What should you play for that first guess? The best starters tend to contain common letters, to increase the chances of getting yellow and green squares to guide your guessing. (And if you get all grays when guessing common letters, that’s still excellent information to help you rule out possibilities.) There isn’t a single “best” starting word, but the New York Times’s Wordle analysis bot has suggested starting with one of these:

  • CRANE

  • TRACE

  • SLANT

  • CRATE

  • CARTE

Meanwhile, an MIT analysis found that you’ll eliminate the most possibilities in the first round by starting with one of these:

  • SALET

  • REAST

  • TRACE

  • CRATE

  • SLATE

Other good picks might be ARISE or ROUND. Words like ADIEU and AUDIO get more vowels in play, but you could argue that it’s better to start with an emphasis on consonants, using a starter like RENTS or CLAMP. Choose your strategy, and see how it plays out.

How to win at Wordle

We have a few guides to Wordle strategy, which you might like to read over if you’re a serious student of the game. This one covers how to use consonants to your advantage, while this one focuses on a strategy that uses the most common letters. In this advanced guide, we detail a three-pronged approach for fishing for hints while maximizing your chances of winning quickly.

The biggest thing that separates Wordle winners from Wordle losers is that winners use their guesses to gather information about what letters are in the word. If you know that the word must end in -OUND, don’t waste four guesses on MOUND, ROUND, SOUND, and HOUND; combine those consonants and guess MARSH. If the H lights up in yellow, you know the solution.

One more note on strategy: the original Wordle used a list of about 2,300 solution words, but after the game was bought by the NYT, the game now has an editor who hand-picks the solutions. Sometimes they are slightly tricky words that wouldn’t have made the original list, and sometimes they are topical. For example, FEAST was the solution one Thanksgiving. So keep in mind that there may be a theme.

Wordle alternatives

If you can’t get enough of five-letter guessing games and their kin, the best Wordle alternatives, ranked by difficulty, include:

Today’s NYT Connections Hints (and Answer) for Friday, January 19, 2024

If you’re looking for the Connections answer for Friday, January 19, 2024, read on—I’ll share some clues, tips, and strategies, and finally the solutions to all four categories. Along the way, I’ll explain the meanings of the trickier words and we’ll learn how everything fits together. Beware, there are spoilers below for January 19, NYT Connections #222! Read on if you want some hints (and then the answer) to today’s Connections game. 

If you want an easy way to come back to our Connections hints every day, bookmark this page. You can also find our past hints there as well, in case you want to know what you missed in a previous puzzle.

Heads up that our format has changed–you’ll no longer need to scroll as far to get to the answers, and we’re spoiling one word per category in the very first hint section. Below, I’ll give you some hints at today’s Connections answers. And farther down the page, I’ll reveal the themes and the answers. Scroll slowly and take just the hints you need!

NYT Connections board for January 19, 2024: NUTS, PEPPERS, DESERT, RATS, FUZZY, CHERRY, MAROON, SEASHELLS, FUDGE, STRAND, SHOOT, SPRINKLES, DARN, DITCH, WOODCHUCK, CURSES.

Credit: Connections/NYT


Hints for the themes in today’s Connections puzzle

Here are some hints for the groupings in today’s Connections, including one word you can find in each:

  • Yellow category – With a CHERRY on top.

  • Green category – Left on a DESERT island.

  • Blue category – DARN you straight to heck!!

  • Purple category – How much wood could a WOODCHUCK chuck?

A heads up about the tricky parts

FUDGE and NUTS could both be mild oaths, but today they go with dessert. (Not DESERT.) 

What are the categories in today’s Connections?

  • Yellow: SUNDAE TOPPINGS

  • Green: LEAVE HIGH AND DRY

  • Blue: “PHOOEY!”

  • Purple: WORDS IN TONGUE TWISTERS

DOUBLE BEWARE: THE SOLUTION IS BELOW

Ready to learn the answers to today’s Connections puzzle? I give them all away below.

What are the yellow words in today’s Connections?

The yellow grouping is considered to be the most straightforward. The theme for today’s yellow group is SUNDAE TOPPINGS and the words are: CHERRY, FUDGE, NUTS, SPRINKLES.

What are the green words in today’s Connections?

The green grouping is supposed to be the second-easiest. The theme for today’s green category is LEAVE HIGH AND DRY and the words are: DESERT, DITCH, MAROON, STRAND.

What are the blue words in today’s Connections?

The blue grouping is the second-hardest. The theme for today’s blue category is “PHOOEY!” and the words are: CURSES, DARN, RATS, SHOOT.

What are the purple words in today’s Connections?

The purple grouping is considered to be the hardest. The theme for today’s purple category is WORDS IN TONGUE TWISTERS and the words are: FUZZY, PEPPERS, SEASHELLS, WOODCHUCK.

How to play Connections

I have a full guide to playing Connections, but here’s a refresher on the rules:

First, find the Connections game either on the New York Times website or in their Crossword app. You’ll see a game board with 16 tiles, each with one word or phrase. Your job is to select a group of four tiles that have something in common. Often they are all the same type of thing (for example: RAIN, SLEET, HAIL, and SNOW are all types of wet weather) but sometimes there is wordplay involved (for example, BUCKET, GUEST, TOP TEN, and WISH are all types of lists: bucket list, guest list, and so on).

Select four items and hit the Submit button. If you guessed correctly, the category and color will be revealed. (Yellow is easiest, followed by green, then blue, then purple.) If your guess was incorrect, you’ll get a chance to try again.

You win when you’ve correctly identified all four groups. But if you make four mistakes before you finish, the game ends and the answers are revealed.

How to win Connections

The most important thing to know to win Connections is that the groupings are designed to be tricky. Expect to see overlapping groups. For example, one puzzle seemed to include six breakfast foods: BACON, EGG, PANCAKE, OMELET, WAFFLE, and CEREAL. But BACON turned out to be part of a group of painters along with CLOSE, MUNCH, and WHISTLER, and EGG was in a group of things that come by the dozen (along with JUROR, ROSE, and MONTH). So don’t hit “submit” until you’ve confirmed that your group of four contains only those four things.

If you’re stuck, another strategy is to look at the words that seem to have no connection to the others. If all that comes to mind when you see WHISTLER is the painting nicknamed “Whistler’s Mother,” you might be on to something. When I solved that one, I ended up googling whether there was a painter named Close, because Close didn’t fit any of the obvious themes, either.

Another way to win when you’re stuck is, obviously, to read a few helpful hints–which is why we share these pointers every day. Check back tomorrow for the next puzzle!

Are 8K TVs Worth It in 2024?

Buying a television is an overwhelming experience: the sheer number of models combined with the various ways companies describe similar technologies (OLED versus QLED, microLED versus miniLED) is enough to make your head spin. One of the most important decisions you’ll likely make regarding a television is the image quality. Right now, that means choosing between 4K and 8K. So, is it worth it to get an 8K television in 2024? For some people, yes—but it’s not for everyone just yet.

When you can get it, 8K content is truly stunning

When I first set up an 8K TV in my home (a 65-inch model loaned to me by Samsung for a review coming later this week), I spent a solid week acting like a 5-year-old at Disneyland; I was absolutely awestruck by the detail and dimension of that many pixels shoved into such a small space. (It’s about 33 million pixels, by the way, compared to the roughly 8.3 million pixels on 4K TVs.)

Once the initial excitement wore off, I was desperate to see whether there was any real difference between 4K and 8K content. To test, I flipped between different resolutions of the same YouTube videos. The library of 8K content on YouTube is limited, but a decent curated collection of cityscapes, wildlife, and fireplaces at 8K resolution are available. When I started watching footage of a fireplace in 8K, I was shocked by how three-dimensional it looked. I could see that the higher resolution had an extra richness and depth to the colors when compared to 4K.

There’s no doubt that 8K content looks amazing, but there’s just not a ton of it yet.

8K content is trickling out

For a while, most of the content you watch will max out at 4K. There are some early signs that more 8K content will be increasingly common soon, though.

Samsung and Warner Brothers Discovery recently announced that it will pair with movie studios to make 8K movie trailers, which makes sense given their investment in 8K TVs. Japan has a dedicated 8K sports channel. TCL TVs have a dedicated high definition channel with 4K and 8K videos called The Explorers, and RED has an entire site dedicated to finding movies shot at this high resolution. Even smartphones are starting to support 8K video recording, Samsung perhaps most notably. The point is, although slow, there’s investment in the creation of this content. But we’re still in the early days.

8K TVs make older stuff look surprisingly good

The good news is that 8K TVs don’t need 8K content to shine, thanks to upscaling, which works surprisingly well.

When you watch content with a lower resolution than your TV (say a 720p, 1080p, or 4K movie on an 8K TV), your TV needs to blow up the image to actually fill the screen. If it displayed the video in its native resolution, you’d see a tiny version of the video surrounding by black, since your TV has so many more pixels than the video. To do this, your TV “adds” additional pixels based on the video, inferring what data the new pixels should use to fill the screen—thus, “upscaling.”

8K televisions, in particular, are armed with processors that use machine learning to determine how to backfill those pixels for smooth results that defy pixelation. The AI models were trained to understand how TV shows should look and can apply that logic to older properties. In my experience, it works pretty well.

Recently, I’m a little embarrassed to say I’ve been using the 8K TV to binge-watch the ’80s sitcom Who’s the Boss—and it looks fantastic. It looks like it was filmed at a far higher resolution on far more modern equipment than what was used at the time. The same processor has made TV shows and movies from the ’90s, the aughts, and more recent years all look completely watchable, despite never being filmed in 8K to begin with.

Obviously, the fewer pixels that have to be compensated for, the better it will look in the end. Don’t expect native 720p and 1080p content to look like it was shot in 4K or 8K. But what was so surprising to me was how completely normal they looked on the 8K TV, with a lot more detail than was probably there in the source video. Of course, not all 8K televisions are created equal, either. They’ll each have different brightness, contrast ratios, and algorithms to handle the upscaling. But since 8K TVs represent the higher end of at-home TV technology, you’re usually getting the latest and best versions of the upscaling technologies, too.

8K TVs aren’t that new anymore

You may have heard that you shouldn’t buy the newest or most expensive model of anything, and that you should instead opt for a slightly older model that’s been well tested and has a lower price tag.

While there’s some truth to that, the good news is there are more 8K TVs every year, and prices are already coming down. Plus, they’re not dramatically more expensive than high-end 4K TVs. Samsung’s 65-inch 8K television is currently $2,599, versus the 4K model at $1,599. It’s also worth noting that some 4K TVs are actually more expensive than the 8K models. Televisions are like major appliances, in my opinion: You should plan to hang onto them for several years. (Research shows the average is 6.6 years.) So, by purchasing a 4K TV, you’re essentially making a bet that 4K will still be the standard a few years from now.

Of course, you might simply not value an ultra-high resolution in the same way that I do, and that’s okay, too. A ton of factors go into making a big purchase like this, but my point is that it would be a mistake to paint with a broad brush and assume that all 8K TVs are going to be prohibitively expensive.

Bottom line: 8K is a perk, but there’s no rush to grab one

In my experience, watching 8K content is absolutely mesmerizing, but there’s just not enough of it to make me tell you to rush out and grab one ASAP. If you’re not desperate to upgrade, you’re safe to wait until the end of 2024 to see how it all plays out. In the meanwhile, a high-end 4K TV is going to give you all the smart functionality, brightness, contrast, and brilliant native 4K resolution for the content that’s available now.

Use These Phrases Instead of Pretending to Agree With Someone

Our time and energy are finite resources, so when we find ourselves disagreeing with someone, we have to decide whether it’s something we care about enough to make it worth discussing it further—or whether it’s easier to simply pretend to agree and get on with our life. Or perhaps you find yourself fake-agreeing with someone because you don’t want to ruffle any feathers, even if it’s something that really bothers you. Either way, you have other options.

Why does expressing disagreement make some people uncomfortable?

Some people love a heated debate or a good argument—or, at the very least, don’t have a problem telling others that they disagree with them. Others, so-called “people pleasers,” may go above and beyond to avoid any kind of interpersonal conflict, confrontation, or disagreement, says Jolie Silva, PhD, a clinical psychologist and chief operating officer of New York Behavioral Health.

According to Silva, there are three ways of handling disagreements: Passiveness, assertiveness, and aggression. “Being passive is usually a sign that someone is avoiding disagreement, because they are ultimately avoiding an uncomfortable emotion, like anxiety or guilt, that would likely result if they had the disagreement,” she explains.

For some people, it goes beyond simply avoiding conflict: They might also be fearful of how the disagreement may impact their relationship with the other person or the way that other person perceives them, says Courtney Morgan, a licensed professional clinical counselor (LPCC) and founder of Counseling Unconditionally, a mental health therapy practice in Louisville, Kentucky. Or, as Carl Nassar, PhD, LPC, a professional counselor based in Denver points out, some people would prefer to end the discussion as quickly as possible to avoid spending time engaging in a disagreement, opting to “go along to get along.”

But pretending to agree with someone isn’t a solution, either. Sure, we may avoid an argument in that moment, but it won’t do us any favors in the long run. “We give up a lot when we do this,” says Nassar. “We give up our voice, and the opportunity to help others grow and to grow ourselves.” Plus, as Morgan points out, it’s also important to “live in ways that align with your personal values,” and pretending to agree with someone about something that matters to you may cause future problems.

Use these phrases instead of pretending to agree with someone

Coming up with something to say in the moment can be tough—especially if you’re focused on avoiding conflict, but also don’t want to end the conversation with the other person thinking you agree with them, or having to resort to agreeing to disagree for the umpteenth time. Here are some suggestions from psychologists:

“I understand your viewpoint, but I see it another way.”

In general, Silva says that you should first validate the other person, and acknowledge that they have a right to their opinion, in order to soften the disagreement, and offer a friendly, rather than combative, tone. This statement, for example, is a direct yet validating way to communicate disagreement, which Silva says can be useful with colleagues.

“I hear you, though I have a different opinion.”

Silva suggests using this warm approach with family members or your partner.

“I can’t go along with that one.”

This would be best used in a casual setting, like a social event with people you’re not very close with, says Morgan. “It feels subtle enough to avoid an unnecessary argument, and it is direct enough to express that we do not agree on the matter,” she says.

“Your argument is valid, but I don’t agree.”

Clear and concise, Silva recommends using this response with friends, colleagues, or family members who tend to be talkative, or don’t give you an opportunity to express your own opinion.

“I am trying to see it your way, but ultimately I think differently about this situation.”

According to Silva, this communicates that you genuinely want to understand their viewpoint, but still do not agree.

“I truly appreciate and respect your opinion, but I see it differently.”

This message takes the edge off and softens the blow of your disagreement. “It may be good to use with your partner, or even supervisor at work,” Silva says.

“That’s a really unique perspective. I haven’t thought of it like that before.”

It’s entirely possible that this is the first time you’ve considered that perspective, and aren’t yet ready to commit to agreeing or disagreeing with it, Morgan says.

The key to politely disagreeing with someone using these, or other similar phrases, is to approach the conversation with open-mindedness, without veering into accusatory or defensive territory. And if you genuinely don’t want to spend a lot of time discussing the topic, communicate this to the person in a respectful way, and do your best to move on.

Amazon’s Newest Fire HD 10 Tablet Is 42% Off Right Now

Amazon’s newest flagship tablet, the Amazon Fire HD 10, is currently 42% off, hitting the lowest price I’ve seen—$104.99 (down from $179.99). That’s the price for the 64GB version; the 32GB version is also discounted to $94.99 (originally $139.99), but if you ask me, double the storage is well worth another $10.

The Amazon Fire HD tablet has 3GB of RAM, a high-definition screen with 1080p, a 13-hour battery life, and the ability to expand your 32GB or 64GB storage by up to 1TB with a microSD card. Choosing to get it without lock screen ads will cost you an extra $15.

The Fire HD 10 is lighter, faster, and has a better camera than its predecessor, the 2021 Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet. A new addition is the ability to use the Fire Max 11, a stylus pen that is sold separately, to tackle hands-on creative work.

Amazon Fire HD tablets aren’t generally considered to be powerhouse tablets, but they are a strong budget option—this specific model happens to be our sister site PCMag’s pick for the best tablet under $150 (you can read their “excellent” review here). The downside of all Amazon tablets is that you’re locked to the Amazon app store (though you can still download most major apps) and you’ll be mostly served up Amazon content. Of course, this can be a plus if you have invested in the Amazon ecosystem, since the Fire HD tablet can control all your other Alexa-enabled Amazon devices.