(Opinion) Once the space-element or point had been lost in terms of dimension in abstractions of place, the lasting persistent relic of precept-ness instead of being represented to the senses as origin in co-ordinate axes, was defined as a group (infinite) of X independent numbers, there was no longer any inherent objection to replacing the number X by the general number n. The notion of dimension was presently changed. No longer regarding the properties of an object in terms of its position in a Euclidean space system but instead representing the randomness of a X-number-group by means of any X dimension. The object space-element point in an X-number-group–consisting of n independent ordered elements–as collapsed wave particles as X, is called the point.
Abstract principles of boundary can be imagined, which transcend in an entirely new sense of the possibilities of sensory definition. From commonplace, for the imagined thinker, there is even in the Cartesian geometry the tendency to get beyond the 3-dimensions of experiential space regarded as an unnecessary restriction on the symbolism of number. Space element as real-ity from in-finite to at-one-ment, the observer of the experiential space is subject to the universal randomness laws of increasing entropy as to the acceleration of its observed natural evolution order.